PDF Download

[1]MIAO Qingfeng,NI Dongning,LI Ruiping,et al.Characteristics of Soil Salt Transfer Under Intercropping and Border-Furrow Irrigation Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):108-113.

Copy

Characteristics of Soil Salt Transfer Under Intercropping and Border-Furrow Irrigation Pattern

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 03 Page number: 108-113 Column: Public date: 2019-04-12

Title:: Characteristics of Soil Salt Transfer Under Intercropping and Border-Furrow Irrigation Pattern

Author(s):: MIAO Qingfeng, NI Dongning, LI Ruiping, FAN Leilei, SHI Haibin; Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Keywords:: wheat/maize intercropping; border-furrow irrigation; soil salt; Hetao Irrigation District

CLC:: S156.4

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In view of serious water waste and increasing soil salinization in the present agricultural production situation for the wheat/maize intercropping conventional irrigation pattern in Hetao Irrigation District. On the basis of ridge furrow irrigation technology, the wheat/maize intercropping border-furrow irrigation technology was first put forward. The dynamic equilibrium of soil salinity in the vertical section of crop root zone in intercropping population under two irrigation patterns was compared. The results showed that the intercropping group had not effectively eliminated the soil salt after several irrigations in the whole growth period, instead, under the effect of irrigation water salt and mineralized groundwater recharge, the salt accumulation situation was obvious; the soil salt storage for border and furrow irrigation maize field increased by 211.08 g and 300.34 g per unit area on average; salt storage increased 202.91 g and 200.43 g, respectively, the conventional irrigation and border-furrow irrigation wheat, the difference was not significant. By quantitative analysis of salt content in soil profile, it was found that the change of soil salt content in border irrigation and furrow irrigation maize was the largest for 0-60 cm layer and 20-60 cm layer, respectively, and furrow irrigation maize was in the state of salt accumulation in the surface soil of 0-20 cm in the whole growth period. The change of salt storage in each soil layer of wheat was the largest for 0-40 cm. The research results can provide technical support for the application of border-furrow irrigation technology in Hetao Irrigation District.

References:: [1] Luciano M, Nicola’s A, Oyonarte. A spreadsheet model to evaluate sloping furrow irrigation accounting for infiltration variability[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005,76(1):62-75.
[2] 王旭清,王法宏,董玉红,等.小麦垄作栽培的肥水效应及光能利用分析[J].山东农业科学,2002(4):3-5.
[3] Daamen C C. Use of microlysimeters to measure evaporation from sandy soils[J]. Agric. for. Meteorol, 1993,65(3/4):159-173.
[4] 苗庆丰,史海滨,李瑞平,等.河套灌区畦-沟分灌水分利用效率及节水效果试验研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(10):135-139.
[5] 石培泽,杨秀英.垄植玉米控制性隔沟交替灌溉节水高效技术及效应[J].甘肃水利水电技术,1999(1):35-37.
[6] 倪东宁,李瑞平,史海滨,等.套种模式下不同灌水方式对玉米根系区土壤水盐运移及产量的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(4):797-804.
[7] Awal M A, Koshi H, Ikeda T. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006,139(1/2):74-83.
[8] 张作为,史海滨,李祯,等.不同灌水处理对间作种植模式下作物水分利用效率及产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(4/5):26-30.
[9] 白岗栓,杜社妮,于健,等.激光平地改善土壤水盐分布并提高春小麦产量[J].农业工程学报,2014,29(8):125-134.
[10] 刘目兴,王静爱,刘连友,等.旱作农田不同结构垄作的生态生产效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):114-118.
[11] 李玮,王立,姜涛.地下水浅埋区盐碱地滴灌条件下土壤盐分运移研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(5):130-135.
[12] Barnard J H, Van Rensburg L D, Bennie A T P. Leaching irrigated saline sandy to sandy loam apedal soils with water of a constant salinity[J]. Irrigation Science.,2010,28(2):191-201.
[13] 倪东宁.间作畦沟分灌模式下土壤水盐热迁移特征及灌水效果评价[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016.
[14] 雷廷武,肖娟,詹卫华,等.沟灌条件下不同灌溉水质对玉米产量和土壤盐分的影响[J].水利学报,2004,35(9):118-122.
[15] 彭振阳,黄介生,伍靖伟,等.秋浇条件下季节性冻融土壤盐分运动规律[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):77-81.
[16] 梁建财,史海滨,李瑞平,等.覆盖对盐渍土壤冻融特性及秋浇灌水质量影响研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(4):98-105.
[17] 孙贯芳,屈忠义,杜斌,等.内蒙古河套灌区不同灌溉模式对土壤温度及盐分的影响[J].节水灌溉,2016(2):28-31.
[18] 马文军,程琴娟,李良涛,等.咸水灌溉下土壤水盐动态及对作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):73-80.
[19] Katerji N, Hoorn J W V, Hamdy A, et al. Salinity effect on crop development and yield, analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods[J]. Agric Water Management, 2003,62(1):37-66.
[20] 余根坚,黄介生,高占义,等.基于HYDRUS模型不同灌水模式下土壤水盐运移模拟[J].水利学报,2013,44(7):826-834.
[21] 王增丽,朱兴平,温广贵,等.垄作沟灌条件下灌溉定额对土壤水盐分布和制种玉米耗水的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(1):50-54.
[22] 袁成福,冯绍元,霍再林,等.咸水非充分灌溉对土壤盐分动态及制种玉米产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2013,32(3):114-116,120.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01