PDF Download

[1]KE Qihua,ZHANG Keli,CHEN Yuehong,et al.Index System and Quantitative Evaluation for the Ecological Effects of Soil and Water Conservation in Karst Area of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):148-154.

Copy

Index System and Quantitative Evaluation for the Ecological Effects of Soil and Water Conservation in Karst Area of Southwest China

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 01 Page number: 148-154 Column: Public date: 2019-02-28

Title:: Index System and Quantitative Evaluation for the Ecological Effects of Soil and Water Conservation in Karst Area of Southwest China

Author(s):: KE Qihua¹, ZHANG Keli¹, CHEN Yuehong², CHEN Meiqi^3,4, LUO Jianyong¹; 1. School of Geography, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Soil & Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Keywords:: karst region of southwest China; ecological effects of soil and water conservation; different spatial scales; index system; quantitative evaluation

CLC:: S157

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Southwest karst area is the key area for soil erosion control in China. Nevertheless, scientific, objective, user-friendly and quick method for evaluation on the ecological effects of soil and water loss control in Southwest karst area is unavailable. Through a combination of data statistical analysis with experts’ experience, we established an index system for the ecological effects of soil and water conservation on different scales in karst area of southwest China, and proposed a quantitative model for the evaluation as well. The case study shows that:this method balancing scientificity and practicability can provide a quick quantitative evaluation for the ecological effects of soil and water loss control on the slope, in small watershed and region in southwest karst area, can also offer some references for the future monitoring and evaluation for the ecological effects of soil and water conservation in karst area of southwest China.

References:: [1] 王治国,张超,孙保平,等.全国水土保持区划概述[J].中国水土保持,2015(12):12-17.
[2] 吕跃进,张维,曾雪兰.指数标度与1-9标度互不相容及其比较研究[J].工程数学学报,2003,20(8):77-81.
[3] 吕跃进,张维.指数标度在AHP标度系统中的重要作用[J].系统工程学报,2003,18(5):452-456.
[4] 骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):51-60.
[5] 吕跃进.指数标度判断矩阵的一致性检验方法[J].统计与决策,2006,24(18):31-32.
[6] 吴尧,官明开,曹煜,等.近50年珠江三大支流水沙关系变化研究[J].水道港口,2016,37(4):405-410.
[7] 熊亚兰,张科利,杨光檄,等.乌江流域水沙特性变化分析[J].生态环境学报,2008,17(5):230-235.
[8] 师长兴.长江上游输沙模数分布图的制作及其空间分异特征初步分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(11):1322-1326.
[9] 许全喜,陈松生,熊明,等.嘉陵江流域水沙变化特性及原因分析[J].泥沙研究,2008(2):1-8.
[10] 王萍.珠江流域人类活动作用下水沙特征变化响应研究[D].广州:中山大学,2010.
[11] 任洪玉.基于GIS的中国径流输沙时空动态变化研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2003.
[12] 朱秀迪,王志刚,任斐鹏,等.西南岩溶区小流域划分与水文特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2017(2):25-27.
[13] 罗志远,杨全明,吴刚.贵州省洪水特性及洪峰模数规律浅析[J].水利规划与设计,2009(2):8-10.
[14] 石浩,张京恩.清水江流域贵州省境内暴雨洪水特性浅析[J].河南水利与南水北调,2012(11):27-28.
[15] 李克让,王绍强,曹明奎.中国植被和土壤碳贮量[J].中国科学,2003,33(1):72-80.
[16] 中华人民共和国水利部.岩溶地区水土流失综合治理技术标准:SL461-2009[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
[17] 苏跃.喀斯特小流域土壤质量变化及其对水环境质量的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.
[18] 刘洋.喀斯特石漠化治理的水土保持效益监测评价研究[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2014.
[19] 陈洪云.喀斯特石漠化综合治理生态监测与效益评价[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2007.
[20] 张如生.水土保持效益及政策效果评价方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2006.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01