[1]CHEN Yitong,XIONG Kangning,XIAO Shizhen,et al.Spatiotemporal Change of Landscape Pattern and Driving Factor in Chishui Danxia Property of China Danxia World Natural Heritage[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):314-321.
Copy
Spatiotemporal Change of Landscape Pattern and Driving Factor in Chishui Danxia Property of China Danxia World Natural Heritage
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
25
Number of periods:
2018 06
Page number:
314-321
Column:
Public date:
2018-10-26
- Title:
- Spatiotemporal Change of Landscape Pattern and Driving Factor in Chishui Danxia Property of China Danxia World Natural Heritage
- Keywords:
- landscape pattern; spatiotemporal change; driving factor; Chishui of China Danxia; World Natural Heritage
- CLC:
- P901
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to study the landscape pattern of Chishui Danxia Property of China Danxia World Natural Heritage, using GIS, ENVI and landscape pattern analysis software FRAGSTATS, we analyzed landscape pattern and its evolution law of the heritage sites and the buffer zone in the three key period of 2001, 2010 and 2016, revealed the characteristics of landscape pattern in the different development stages of Chishui Danxia Property of China Danxia World Natural Heritage, further discussed the influence factors of landscape pattern change. The results show that: (1) Since 2001, all kinds of landscape of the research area have been in the process of dynamic change, and forestland landscape is the dominant landscape of research area, which has occupied more than 80% of the research area, in the 16 years, the area of forestland, shrub and grass land, construction land, bare land and water body present the net increase, and the cultivated land area present the net decrease; (2) The landscape dynamic change degree in the 2001—2010 was larger, and the forestland landscape area ratio had increased by 6.98%, the cultivated land area ratio had decreased by 8.4% and the area had reduced by nearly a half, and 44% of the cultivated land area and 64.35% of the shrub and grass land area had been transferred to the forestland. The degree of landscape fragmentation had fallen sharply; (3) During 2010—2016, the landscape dynamic change degree was relatively small, and that the area ratio of forestland had decreased by 1.22%, the cultivated land area ratio had increased by 1%, and the construction area continued to increase; the transfer rate of construction land was highest, followed by bare land; the richness degree of landscape type had increased, the degree of landscape fragmentation had slightly risen; (4) In addition to the natural evolution of the ecological system, the policy of returning farmland to forest, urban construction, highway traffic construction are the main driving factors on landscape pattern change of research area, and tourism growth and development have relatively little impact on the landscape pattern.
- References:
-
[1] Robert Wood, John Handley. Landscape dynamics and the management of change[J]. Landscape Research, 2001,26(1):45-54.
[2] 彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
[3] 葛方龙,李伟峰,陈求稳.景观格局演变及其生态效应研究进展[J].生态环境,2008,17(6):2511-2519.
[4] 邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[5] 张秋菊,傅伯杰,陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题[J].地理科学,2003,23(3):264-270.
[6] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明,等.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[7] 路瑶.珠峰自然保护区景观格局演化及其驱动因子研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2008.
[8] 孙克勤.中国的世界遗产保护与可持续发展研究[J].中国地质大学学报:社会科学版,2008,8(3):36-40.
[9] Musacchio L, Ozdenerol E, Bryant M, et al. Changing landscapes, changing disciplines:Seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in landscape ecological change research[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015,73(4):326-338.
[10] 刘晓君,李占斌,李鹏,等.基于土地利用/覆被变化的流域景观格局与水沙响应关系研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(18):1-10.
[11] 郭泺,余世孝.泰山风景区景观格局时空变化的研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(4):641-646.
[12] 郭泺,夏北成,余世孝,等.人为干扰对泰山景观格局时空变化的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(4):235-239.
[13] 阳柏苏,郑华,尹刚强,等.张家界森林公园景观格局变化分析[J].林业科学,2006,42(7):11-15.
[14] 胡海胜,魏美才,唐继刚,等.庐山风景名胜区景观格局动态及其模拟[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4696-4706.
[15] 梁艳艳,周年兴,谢慧玮,等.庐山森林景观格局变化的长期动态模拟[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7807-7818.
[16] 周年兴,黄震方,林振山.武陵源世界自然遗产旅游地景观格局变化[J].地理研究,2008,27(4):734-744.
[17] 邓贵平,覃建雄,颜磊.旅游发展对九寨沟自然保护区景观格局变化的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(5):579-584.
[18] 何东进,洪伟,胡海清,等.武夷山风景名胜区景观空间格局研究[J].林业科学,2004,40(1):174-179.
[19] 熊康宁,肖时珍,陈浒,等.世界遗产与赤水丹霞景观[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
[20] 杜芳娟,熊康宁,先青平.赤水-习水丹霞景观美学价值与对比分析[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2008,26(1):26-29.
[21] 胡耀.浅谈贵州赤水丹霞的物种多样性[J].才智,2013,13(14):304.
[22] 杨丽.贵州赤水丹霞生态旅游开发初探[J].旅游纵览,2016,6(2):160-161.
[23] 马肖静.谈贵州赤水丹霞地貌世界遗产的价值与保护[J].旅游纵览,2013,3(3):112-113.
[24] 姜鑫,安裕伦.3S技术在贵州喀斯特地区农业景观格局分析的应用:以普安县为例[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(3):36-39.
[25] 李瑞,杨晓晖,张克斌,等.基于RS和GIS的青海香日德绿洲景观格局特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(3):129-131.
[26] 么欣欣,韩春兰,刘洪彬,等.基于RS与GIS的沈阳市土地利用及景观格局变化[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(2):158-162.
[27] 朱星磊,安裕伦,黄祖宏,等.喀斯特地区遥感影像解译新算法:支持向量机算法[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(2):222-226.
[28] 吴健生,王政,张理卿,等.景观格局变化驱动力研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1739-1746.
[29] 程乾,吴秀菊.杭州西溪国家湿地公园1993年以来景观演变及其驱动力分析[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(9):1677-1682.
[30] 刘明,王克林.洞庭湖流域中上游地区景观格局变化及其驱动力[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(6):1317-1324.
[31] Hersperger A M, Bürgi M. Going beyond landscape change description:Quantifying the importance of driving forces of landscape change in a Central Europe case study[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009,26(3):640-648.
[32] 笪志祥.赤水退耕还林中梁山慈竹生态效益的研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01