PDF Download

[1]HAN Yu,ZHAO Wei,ZHANG Qixiang,et al.Effects of Different Vegetation Patterns on Ecological Restoration in Mining Wasteland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):120-125.

Copy

Effects of Different Vegetation Patterns on Ecological Restoration in Mining Wasteland

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 01 Page number: 120-125 Column: Public date: 2018-02-28

Title:: Effects of Different Vegetation Patterns on Ecological Restoration in Mining Wasteland

Author(s):: HAN Yu¹, ZHAO Wei², ZHANG Qixiang³, WANG Qi¹, SHI Nana¹, XIAO Nengwen¹, QUAN Zhanjun¹; 1. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;
2. Beijing Enterprises Holdings Maglev Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100124, China;
3. School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China

Keywords:: vegetation restoration; mining wasteland; species diversity; soil property

CLC:: X171.4

DOI:: -

Abstract:: For the purpose of studying the effects of different vegetation restoration patterns on ecological restoration in mining wasteland, dumps of Chengmenshan copper mine was chosen as the study site so as to investigate and analyze plant community structure, soil nutrient and heavy metal contents under 7 different vegetation patterns, compared with the dumps before vegetation restoration and the undisturbed sites. The results showed that:(1) the richness index, diversity index and uniformity index of different vegetation modes showed the same trend; the community abundance and diversity of Robinia pseudoacacia-Abutilon theophrasti-Cynodon dactylon were higher, while these parameters were lower under Abutilon theophrasti-Cynodon dactylon and Robinia pseudoacacia-Sesbania cannabina than those under the other modes; (2) vegetation restoration could significantly improve soil nutrient status and decrease heavy metal contents; the soil available K and N increased by 2.5～7.7 times and 3.4～7.9 times, respectively, compared with the those before the restoration, but still did not reach up to the natural levels; the content of Cu remarkably decreased under Robinia pseudoacacia and Abutilon theophrasti, Robinia pseudoacacia and Sesbania cannabina could effectively remediate soil Pb pollution as well; (3) the comprehensive evaluation indicated that Robinia pseudoacacia-Sesbania cannabina-Abutilon theophrasti-Cynodon dactylon, Robinia pseudoacacia-Abutilon theophrasti-Sesbania cannabina and Robinia pseudoacacia-Cynodon dactylon-Abutilon theophrasti had better comprehensive improvement effects on ecological restoration, which can provide reference for similar mine wasteland.

References:: [1] 高国雄,高保山,周心澄,等.国外工矿山土地复垦动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(1):98-103.
[2] Parrotta J A. The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded ecosystems[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 1992,41:115-133.
[3] 王婧静.金属矿山废弃地生态修复与可持续发展研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(15):8082-8084,8087.
[4] 杨勤学,赵冰清,郭东罡.中国北方露天煤矿区植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(4):1152-1157.
[5] 项元和,李国萍,于晓杰.现代露天矿排土场生态修复与植被重建技术研究[C]//中国水土保持学会规划设计专业委员会.2009年年会暨学术研讨会论文集,2009:107-114.
[6] Harris J A, Birch P, Palmer P. Land restoration and reclamation:Principles and practice[M]. Singapore:Prentice Hall, 1996.
[7] Reid N B, Naeth M A. Establishment of a vegetation cover on tundrakimberlit mine tailings:A field study[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2005,13(4):602-608.
[8] 彭东海,侯晓龙,何宗明,等.金尾矿废弃地不同植被恢复模式群落特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):50-55.
[9] 中国环境监测总站.土壤元素的近代分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992:74-76.
[10] 韩煜,赵廷宁,陈琳,等.坡面植被恢复试验示范区植被群落特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):188-194.
[11] 章家恩.生态学常用试验研究方法与技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007.
[12] Li X R, Xiao H L, Zhang J G, et al. Long-term ecosystem effects of sand-binding vegetation in the Tengger Desert Northern China[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2004,12:376-390.
[13] 郭逍宇,张金屯,宫辉力,等.安太堡矿区复垦地植被恢复过程多样性变化[J].生态学报,2005,25(4):763-770.
[14] 秦娟,唐心红,杨雪梅.马尾松不同林型对土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(4):598-604.
[15] 徐佩,吴超,邱冠豪.我国铅锌矿山土壤重金属污染规律研究[J].土壤通报,2015,46(3):739-744.
[16] 邹文佳,张淇翔,石林,等.江西某铜矿排土场与尾矿库重金属释放规律及其对地下水的污染风险[J].有色金属工程,2016,6(1):90-94.
[17] Wang Y B, Liu D Y, Zhang L, et al. Patterns of vegetation succession in the process of ecological restoration on the deserted land of Shizishan copper tailings in Tongling city[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2004,46(7):780-787.
[18] 侯晓龙,庄凯,刘爱琴,等.福建省紫金山金铜矿废弃地不同植被配置模式的恢复效果分析[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):147-151,157.
[19] 赵洋,张鹏,胡宜刚,等.露天煤矿排土场不同配置人工植被对草本植物物种多样性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(2):387-392.
[20] 施翔,陈益泰,王树凤,等.3种木本植物在铅锌和铜矿砂中的生长及对重金属的吸收[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1818-1826.
[21] 张然然,罗鹏林,刘远河,等.大冶铜绿山矿区优势草本植物重金属富集能力测定[J].化学与生物工程,2016,33(11):63-70.
[22] 彭东海,侯晓龙,何宗明,等.金尾矿废弃地不同植被恢复模式对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(6):137-142.
[23] Zuo X A, Zhao X Y, Zhao H L, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and vegetation-soil relationships following vegetation restoration of mobile dunes in Horqin Sandy Land, Northern China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2009,318(1/2):153-167.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01