PDF Download

[1]SHEN Jiayan,LI Xiaoying,YUAN Yong,et al.Response of Soil Enzymes to Different Elevations and Aspects in Naban Basin Nature Reserve[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):111-119,125.

Copy

Response of Soil Enzymes to Different Elevations and Aspects in Naban Basin Nature Reserve

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 01 Page number: 111-119,125 Column: Public date: 2018-02-28

Title:: Response of Soil Enzymes to Different Elevations and Aspects in Naban Basin Nature Reserve

Author(s):: SHEN Jiayan, LI Xiaoying, YUAN Yong, WEN Jingyuan; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwestern Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China

Keywords:: soil enzyme activity; elevation; slope direction; correlation

CLC:: S714.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: We collected soil samples in River nature reserve on the basis of elevation and slope, analyzed the variations of the urine enzyme, protease, sucrose, catalase four main soil enzyme activity and the change of main nutrient indexes. The results showed that soil organic matter, the hydrolysis nitrogen content increased significantly with the increase of altitude; on sunny slope, total nitrogen contents showed the trends of decreasing with the increase of altitude from middle to both ends, and in shady slope, total nitrogen content increased with the increase of altitude; soil available P contents showed the decreasing trends with the increase of altitude from middle to both ends; protease activity was higher in low altitude than that in the high altitude, the surface catalase activity was less influenced by elevation, urease and sucrose activity fluctuated along with the elevation; soil organic matter, total nitrogen, hydrolyzed nitrogen, available phosphorus content were higher on the sunny slope than those on the shady slope; soil protease, sucrose, catalase activities were higher on shady slope than those on the sunny slope, soil urease activities in the soil layers were higher on sunny slope than those on the shady slope. The nutrient content and enzyme activity were higher in the surface that those in the deep layers. Correlation between soil enzyme activity and the fertility factor was significant, correlation between each soil enzyme activities were significant. Organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus were the major factors influencing the activities of protease, followed by available phosphorus and hydrolysis nitrogen; total phosphorus, available phosphorus, hydrolyze nitrogen were the main factors affecting the activity of urease, followed by organic matter, total phosphorus, available potassium. Principal component analysis results showed that the protease and urease activity identified as of soil fertility index was feasible in the nature reserve area.

References:: [1] 陶宝先,张金池,愈元春,等.苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2349-2354.
[2] 蒋智林,刘万学,万方浩,等.紫茎泽兰与非洲狗尾草单,混种群落土壤酶活性和土壤养分的比较[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(4):900-907.
[3] 邱丽萍,刘军,王益权,等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(3):277-280.
[4] 杨万勤,王开运.森林土壤酶的研究进展[J].林业科学,2004,40(2):152-159.
[5] 刘峰,樊国盛,陶国达.纳板河保护区野生药用植物资源研究[J].环境科学导刊,2010,29(4):21-24.
[6] 晁增华.纳板河流域国家级自然保护区森林资源现状及发展对策[J].山东林业科技,2010,40(3):104-106.
[7] 苏惠,杨云.纳板河自然保护区石斛属植物资源现状与保护对策[J].林业调查规划,2006,31(5):100-102.
[8] 王东升,施春蕾,刘峰,等.中国云南纳板河国家级自然保护区苔藓植物研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2008,16(5):452-465.
[9] 胡建忠.人工沙棘林地土壤酶分布及其与土壤理化性状间关系的研究[J].沙棘,1996,9(2):22-28.
[10] 陶宝先,张金池,愈元春,等.苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2349-2354.
[11] 赵益新,陈巨东.通径分析模型及其在生态因子决定程度研究中的应用[J].四川师范大学学报:自然科学版,2007,30(1):120-123.
[12] 刘广深,徐冬梅,许中坚,等.用通径分析法研究土壤水解酶活性与土壤性质的关系[J].土壤学报,2003,40(5):756-762.
[13] 李新蕊.主成分分析,因子分析,聚类分析的比较与应用[J].山东教育学院学报,2007,22(6):23-26.
[14] 李新蕊.主成分分析,因子分析,聚类分析的比较与应用[J].山东教育学院学报,2007,22(6):23-26.
[15] 张子龙,王文全,缪作清,等.主成分分析在三七连作土壤质量综合评价中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(6):1636-1644.
[16] 彭新华,李元沅,赵其国.我国中亚热带山地土壤有机质研究[J].山地学报,2001,19(6):489-496.
[17] 杨克凤.马鬃岭自然保护区土壤碳蓄积的研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽农业大学,2011.
[18] 车宗玺,刘贤德,车宗奇,等.祁连山青海云杉林土壤有机质及氮素的空间分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):164-169.
[19] 杨万勤,钟章成,陶建平,等.缙云山森林土壤酶活性与植物多样性的关系[J].林业科学,2001,37(4):124-128.
[20] 金裕华.武夷山不同海拔土壤微生物多样性的变化特征[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012.
[21] 蒲玉琳.横断山区北段山地土壤坡向性分异研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2005.
[22] 郭永龙,毕如田,王瑾,等.华北典型山区忻州不同小生境坡耕地土壤肥力特征[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):205-208,218.
[23] 陈颖,雷波,罗承德,等.康定木格措冷杉林土壤有机质水平及其预测[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):252-257.
[24] 陈颖,雷波,罗承德,等.康定木格措冷杉林土壤有机质水平及其预测[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):252-257.
[25] 万忠梅,宋长春.土壤酶活性对生态环境的响应研究进展[J].土壤通报,2009(4):951-956.
[26] 张仕艳,原海红,陆梅,等.滇西北不同利用类型土壤酶活性及其与理化性质与微生物的关系[J].亚热带水土保持,2010(2):13-16.
[27] 郑文教,王良睦,林鹏.福建和溪亚热带雨林土壤酶活性的研究[J].生态学杂志,1995(6):16-20.
[28] 林绍霞,张清海,张珍明,等.基于通径分析法的土壤性质对茶叶品质的影响研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):189-194.
[29] 吴永铃,王兵,戴伟,等.杉木人工林土壤酶活性与土壤性质的通径分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(2):78-83.
[30] 刘广深,徐冬梅,许中坚,等.用通径分析法研究土壤水解酶活性与土壤性质的关系[J].土壤学报,2003,40(5):756-762.
[31] 杨晓娟,廖超英,李晓明,等.榆林沙区樟子松林土壤酶活性与土壤化学性质的通径分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(9):109-112.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01