PDF Download

[1]ZHENG Qiuxia,KUANG Yaoqiu,HUANG Ningsheng,et al.Spatiotemporal Measurement and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors on Tourism Eco-security in Guangdong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):252-258.

Copy

Spatiotemporal Measurement and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors on Tourism Eco-security in Guangdong Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 05 Page number: 252-258 Column: Public date: 2017-10-28

Title:: Spatiotemporal Measurement and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors on Tourism Eco-security in Guangdong Province

Author(s):: ZHENG Qiuxia^1,2, KUANG Yaoqiu^1,2, HUANG Ningsheng^1,2, ZHAO Yi^1,2,3; 1. Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou 510070, China

Keywords:: tourism eco-security; PSR model; spatiotemporal characteristic; obstacle degree; Guangdong Province

CLC:: F301;X826

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on pressure-status-response (PSR) model, we chose Guangdong Province as the sample and established the evaluation systems of tourism eco-security, then applied entropy weight and synthetic evaluation model to analyze spatiotemporal variation characteristics of tourism eco-security in Guangzhou, finally adopted obstacle degree model to diagnose the main limiting factors on tourism eco-security. The results are shown as follows. (1) During the period from 2005 to 2014, the comprehensive tourism eco-security index showed the rising trend, and the security level raised from the risk grade to the relatively safe grade. (2) Besides Jieyang, tourism eco-security levels of other 20 cities have improved from 2005 to 2014. (3) From the index layer， the biggest obstacle factor of tourism eco-security in Guangdong Province is urban living sewage treatment from 2005 to 2008, the biggest one is solid waste discharge from 2009 to 2010, and the biggest one is urbanization rate from 2011 to 2014, and the main influence factors shifted from factors of environmental economy to the ones of social economy. From the point of target layer, now pressure system becomes the main factor to hinder the promotion of tourism eco-security level in Guangdong Province.

References:: [1] 曹新向,陈太政,王伟红.旅游地生态安全评价研究:以开封市为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):209-212.
[2] 李若凝,王晶,程柯.云台山旅游景区生态安全评价与优化对策[J].北京林业大学学报:社会科学版,2010,9(1):71-75.
[3] 吕君.旅游生态安全思想的缘起及其安全状态诊断[J].内蒙古财经学院学报,2007(5):35-38.
[4] 章锦河,张捷,王群.旅游地生态安全测度分析:以九寨沟自然保护区为例[J].地理研究,2008,28(2):449-458.
[5] 李亚娟,陈田,胡静,等.武汉市旅游生态安全评价研究[J].资源与生态学报:英文版,2013,4(2):149-156.
[6] 汪朝辉,吴楚材,成凤明.张家界国家森林公园生态安全管理模式探析[J].经济地理,2009,29(9):1580-1584.
[7] 周大庆.旅游生态安全视野的政府与市场分工[J].经济地理,2011,31(3):514-517.
[8] 游巍斌,何东进,巫丽芸,等.武夷山风景名胜区景观生态安全度时空分异规律[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6317-6327.
[9] 时卉,杨兆萍,韩芳,等.新疆天池景区生态安全度时空分异特征与驱动机制[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(3):475-485.
[10] 吕君,于相贤,刘丽梅.旅游发展生态安全的动力学机制探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(4):146-149.
[11] 武春友,郭玲玲,于惊涛.区域旅游生态安全的动态仿真模拟[J].系统工程,2013,31(2):94-99.
[12] 吕君,陈田,刘丽梅.区域旅游发展的生态安全系统分析:以内蒙古自治区四子王旗为例[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):80-88.
[13] 游巍斌,何东进,覃德华,等.世界双遗产地生态安全预警体系构建及应用:以武夷山风景名胜区为例[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(5):1455-1467.
[14] 郑永贤,薛菲,张智光.森林旅游景区生态安全IRDS模型实证研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(12):2350-2360.
[15] 雷艳锦,帅红.基于物元模型的张家界市生态安全预警研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015,50(11):147-152.
[16] 周彬,林生,陈田,等.浙江省旅游生态安全的时空格局及障碍因子[J].地理科学,2015,35(5):599-607.
[17] 王富喜,毛爱华,李赫龙,等.基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J].地理科学,2013,33(11):1323-1329.
[18] 周晓飞,雷国平,徐珊.城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断:以哈尔滨市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):126-130.
[19] 张锐,刘友兆.我国耕地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(7):945-951.
[20] 陈艳,谭建光,鲍宇阳,等.城市化对旅游的影响及其反馈机制研究进展[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,49(6):613-618.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01