[1]CHEN Jingyi,LUO Hongxia,HU Linli,et al.Correlation Between Social Economic Development and Ecosystem Service Value —A Case of Chongqing Metropolitan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):330-336.
Copy
Correlation Between Social Economic Development and Ecosystem Service Value —A Case of Chongqing Metropolitan Area
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
24
Number of periods:
2017 04
Page number:
330-336
Column:
Public date:
2017-08-28
- Title:
- Correlation Between Social Economic Development and Ecosystem Service Value —A Case of Chongqing Metropolitan Area
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- The ecosystem service values of different geographical units have been calculated using the land use data of Chongqing metropolitan in 2003, 2013, and entropy evaluation method has been used to measure the level of social economic development accordingly in this paper, and to analyze the spatial-temporal change. Furthermore, we tried to analyze the spatial correlation between social economic development level and ecosystem service value by utilizing bivariate spatial autocorrelation method. The conclusions can be obtained as follows. The increase of ecosystem service value was RMB 10.098 billion Yuan， in the spatial distribution presented high value in the southeast and the low value in northwest, and the middle part of research area, namely the main city of Chongqing with the feature of low value accumulation. The change of the value of Chongqing main city is most significant, yet the values of other districts and counties are most stable. The level of social economic development is reducing gradually from the core area of Chongqing, and the edge of the core area, especially the urban function development zone of Chongqing, is changing mostly. The spatial correlation between the level of social economic development and ecosystem service value is negative. The middle area of the main city is the high—high and high—low accumulation area, the western part of research area is the low—low accumulation area，and the southeastern part is low—high. The high—high accumulation area is sprawling, the high—low and low—low accumulation areas are shrinking, and the low—high accumulation area is shifting distinctly in these 10 years.
- References:
-
[1] 刘耀彬,李仁东,宋雪锋.中国区域城市化与生态环境耦合的关联分析[J].地理学报,2005,60(2):237-247.
[2] 杨振,牛叔文,常慧丽,等.基于生态足迹模型的区域生态经济发展持续性评估[J].经济地理,2005,25(4):542-546.
[3] 左其亭,陈嘻.社会经济-生态环境耦合系统动力学模型[J].上海环境科学,2001,20(12):592-595.
[4] 方创琳,杨玉梅.城市化与生态环境交互耦合系统的基本定律[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(1):1-8.
[5] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[6] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[7] Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29(2):293-301.
[8] 石晓丽,王卫.生态系统功能价值综合评估方法与应用:以河北省康保县为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3998-4006.
[9] 叶延琼,章家恩,李韵,等.基于农用地变化的社会经济驱动因子对广东省农业生态系统服务价值的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2011,32(6):740-741.
[10] 马骏,马朋,李昌晓,等.基于土地利用的三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].林业科学,2014,50(5):17-26.
[11] 吴沛瑶,陈龙乾,张宇,等.社会经济发展对土地生态服务价值的影响:以江苏省徐州市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(4):435-438.
[12] 郜红娟,韩会庆,罗绪强.贵州省生态系统服务价值与社会经济空间相关性分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(2):262-266.
[13] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[14] 汪小平,周宝同,王小玉,等.重庆市土地利用变化及其生态系统服务价值响应[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,34(5):225-229.
[15] 王刚,谢世友.基于土地利用变化的重庆市生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,36(5):177-181.
[16] 丛海彬,邹德玲,吴福象.中国社会经济综合发展水平时空格局演化及驱动因素[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):21-29.
[17] 陈明星,陆大道,张华.中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):387-398.
[18] 徐勇,樊杰.区域发展差距测度指标体系探讨[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(9):1159-1166.
[19] 张松林,张昆,全局空间自相关Moran指数和G系数对比研究[J].中山大学学报:自然科学版,2007,46(4):93-97.
[20] Anselin L. The Local Indicators of Spatial Association:LISA[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1995,27(2):93-115.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01