[1]LI Haiqiang,GUO Chengjiu,LI Yong.Variation Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Sloping Farmland With Measures of Soil and Water Conservation Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):43-48.
Copy
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
24
Number of periods:
2017 02
Page number:
43-48
Column:
Public date:
2017-04-28
- Title:
-
Variation Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Sloping Farmland With Measures of Soil and Water Conservation Based on GIS
- Author(s):
-
LI Haiqiang1, GUO Chengjiu1, LI Yong2
-
1. College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultrural University, Shenyang 110866, China;
2. Soil and Water Conservation Station of Huanren Manchu Autonomous County, Huanren, Liaoning 117200, China
-
- Keywords:
-
soil and water conservation measures; soil nutrient; ArcGIS; spatial interpolation
- CLC:
-
S152.71
- DOI:
-
-
- Abstract:
-
We selected soil nutrient in soil and water conservation measures system composed of water conservation forest, level terrace and terrace plants and no measures slope farmland as the research sample. We used GPS to locate the sampling point and combined traditional statistical analysis and ArcGIS’s statistical analysis, compared the parameters and error values, and selected the best spatial interpolation model (spherical model) to study soil nutrient spatial variability in soil and water conservation measures system and no measures slope farmland. The results showed as follows. (1) The spatial variability of five indicators follows the order:TP > available P > TN > organic matter > pH, the spatial variabilities of TN, TP, available P and pH are significantly affected by soil and water conservation measures, while organic matter is impacted not only by non-human factors but also by human factors. (2) The use of Kriging interpolation mapping shows that the five indicators unevenly distributed in the space. The content of soil nutrient resulting from taking conservation measures was significantly higher than that of the control area. From the top of the hill to the bottom of the slope, soil nutrient decreased regularity under no measure. The spatial variation of soil pH was opposite to that of organic matter, TN, TP and available P. (3) Soil and water conservation forest interception effects on TN, TP and organic matter are the best, and the interception effect of level terrace of P is significant. As a result of no control area as a necessary sink part of the lost soil nutrients, soil nutrient content was high in this area, showing that ridge plants have no significant effect on nutrient retention. With regard to pH in space, the corresponding planting plants make soil pH value of in water conservation forest and ridge plant belt decrease.