PDF Download

[1]ZHAO Dong,FU Zuolin,XU Decai,et al.Community Structure of Planted Picea asperata Mast. Forest in Shatan Forest Farm[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):346-350.

Copy

Community Structure of Planted Picea asperata Mast. Forest in Shatan Forest Farm

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 01 Page number: 346-350 Column: Public date: 2017-02-28

Title:: Community Structure of Planted Picea asperata Mast. Forest in Shatan Forest Farm

Author(s):: ZHAO Dong, FU Zuolin, XU Decai, LI Danchun, QI Rui, QI Hao; Research Institute of Forestry, Bailongjiang Forestry Management Bureau, Lanzhou 730070, China

Keywords:: Picea asperata Mast.; community structure; vegetation restoration; Shatan forest farm

CLC:: S718.54

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to further understand the responses of community structure to the management of artificial afforestation to restore vegetation in Bailongjiang river forest district, we planted artificial Picea asperata Mast. as experimental sample and the typical sampling as experimental method to explore the community characteristics of Picea asperata Mast. among the low, middle and high altitudes in the local site. The results showed that: (1) the Picea asperata Mast. community structure was simple, and the structure parameter of arborous layer was negatively connected with that of shrub layer and herb layer, respectively; (2) the individuals of Picea asperata Mast. community were the young-aged forest and affected by site conditions, mainly distributed in low-stature and thin-diameter extent; the height and diameter were variable among different altitudes, the growth of Picea asperata Mast. in middle altitude was better than the others; (3) the density of artificial Picea asperata Mast. was slightly high and the species was singleness, resulting in a unstable forest community, which did not improve and maintain the structure of Picea asperata Mast. community.

References:: [1] 沈照仁.人工造林与持续经营[J].世界林业研究,1994(4):8-13.
[2] 刘中奇,朱清科,秦伟.半干旱黄土区自然恢复与人工造林恢复植被群落对比研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4):857-863.
[3] 曾思齐,佘济云.长江中上游低质低效次生林改造技术研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.
[4] 姜凤岐.现有防护林合理经营与改造技术研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
[5] 邓东周,张小平,鄢武先.低效林改造研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2010(4):65-69.
[6] 王红霞,王雪松,王兵,等.河北省退耕还林工程生态效益评估[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(1):68-75.
[7] 袁正科.湘南丘陵区防护林体系建设配套技术研究与示范综合报告[J].湖南林业科技,2000,27(3):11-20.
[8] 仇胜国,朗进宝,裘贤龙,等.奉化市水竹天然林改造丰产技术[J].内蒙古农业科技,2010(1):131.
[9] 王国梁,刘国彬,刘芳,等.黄土沟壑区植被恢复过程中植物群落组成及结构变化[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2550-2557.
[10] 程积民,万惠娥,胡相明.黄土丘陵区植被恢复重建模式与演替过程研究[J].草地学报,2005,13(4):324-327.
[11] 王晗生.干旱影响下人工林的天然更新进程[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(5):743-750.
[12] 冉雄林.华家岭林带人工低产林改造试验[J].甘肃林业科技,2003,28(3):57-60.
[13] 宋子才,华尚铭.华家岭林带考察报告[J].甘肃农业大学学报,1983(4):53-63.
[14] 岳军伟,朱恒,龙蔚.红壤低丘马尾松低效林主要植物群落物种多样性[J].林业科技开发,2010,24(5):53-56.
[15] 赵栋,刘锦乾,杨永红,等.白龙江水源涵养林不同林龄土壤性状[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(32):12616-12619.
[16] 李永宁,张宾兰,秦淑英,等.郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(1):40-46.
[17] 李利平,安尼瓦尔·买买提,王襄平.新疆山地针叶林乔木胸径-树高关系分析[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(1):47-53.
[18] 赵维俊,刘贤德,金铭,等.祁连山青海云杉林群落结构特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(4):615-620.
[19] 周建勤.北京低山风景区残次林评价与改造研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
[20] 利平,刘怿宁,唐志尧,等.新疆山地针叶林的群落结构及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2011,1(28):31-39.
[21] 刘翠玲,潘存德,梁瀛,等.鳞毛蕨(Dryopteris filix-mas)天山云杉林种群结构分析[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(1):60-65.
[22] 周国芳.西藏昌都地区云杉群落空间分布格局的分形分析[J].中南林业调查规划,2002,21(3):62-64.
[23] 多尧.祁连山(北坡)青海云杉群落物种多样性研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2005.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01