PDF Download

[1]WANG Weifeng,WEI Xiaohua,DUAN Yuxi,et al.Long-term Effects of Logging Residue Treatment on Carbon Sequestration in Chinese Fir Plantation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):198-203.

Copy

Long-term Effects of Logging Residue Treatment on Carbon Sequestration in Chinese Fir Plantation

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 06 Page number: 198-203 Column: Public date: 2016-12-28

Title:: Long-term Effects of Logging Residue Treatment on Carbon Sequestration in Chinese Fir Plantation

Author(s):: WANG Weifeng¹, WEI Xiaohua², DUAN Yuxi¹, WANG Bo¹, ZHANG Lixin¹, LI Xiaojing¹; 1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry Science, Hohhot 010010, China;
2. University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia V1 V1 V7, Canada

Keywords:: logging residue; FORECAST model; carbon sequestration; Chinese fir plantation

CLC:: S718.55⁺6

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Under the background of global climate change, adaptive management of plantation has the important influence on the promotion of carbon sequestration potential. Using FORECAST ecosystem management model developed by University of British Columbia, Canada, through field investigation, collecting Chinese fir relevant literature resources under different site conditions. The data include biomass accumulation, stand density, light response curve and soil nutrient, we calibrate and test model, and simulate different logging residue treatment effects of Chinese fir plantation on carbon sequestration. The results showed that SO treatment (cutting stem, logging residue in forest land) of Chinese fir carbon sequestration long-term effect is the best, followed by FR treatment second part (cutting stem, cleaning the ground logging residue), but WH (cutting full tree, remove all logging residue) and SB (after cutting, burning logging residue) carbon sequestration effects are the worst. This study can provide theoretical basis for sustainable management of Chinese fir plantation.

References:: [1] 王伟峰,段玉玺,张立欣,等.适应全球气候变化的森林固碳计量方法评述[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2016,40(3):170-176.
[2] 魏晓华,郑吉,刘国华,等.人工林碳汇潜力新概念及应用[J].生态学报,2015,35(12),3881-3885.
[3] Wang W F, Wei X H, Liao W M, et al. Evaluation of the effects of forest management strategies on carbon sequestration in evergreen broad-leaved (Phoebe bournei) plantation forests using FORECAST ecosystem model[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013,300,21-32.
[4] 吴承祯,洪伟,著.杉木数量经营学引论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
[5] 盛炜彤,范少辉.杉木及其人工林自身特性对长期立地生产力的影响[J].林业科学研究,2002,15(6):629-636.
[6] 姜丹,何宗明,尹云锋,等.采伐剩余物管理方式对人工林土壤黑碳和黑氮的影响[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2014,9(3):68-74.
[7] 李新乐.采伐剩余物处理对杉木生长的影响[J].林业勘察设计,2011(2):35-38.
[8] Kimmins J P, Blanco J A, Seely B, et al. Complexity in modelling forest ecosystems:How much is enough?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,256(10):1646-1658.
[9] Seely B, Welham C, Kimmins J P. Carbon sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem:results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORECAST[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002,169(1-2):123-135.
[10] Kimmins J P, Mailly D, Seely B. Modelling forest ecosystem net primary production:the hybrid simulation approach used in FORECAST[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1999,122(3):195-224.
[11] 接程月,辛赞红,信晓颖,等. FORECAST模型的原理、方法和应用[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(6):909-915.
[12] 田晓,胡靖宇,刘苑秋,等.森林生态系统经营的新模式:FORECAST模型[J].林业调查规划,2010,35(6):18-22.
[13] Bi J, Blanco J A, Kimmins J P, et al. Yield decline in Chinese fir plantations:a simulation investigation with implications for model complexity[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2007,37(9):1615-1630.
[14] 田大伦,康文星,文仕知,等.杉木林生态系统学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[15] 田大伦.中国生态系统定位观测与研究数据集:湖南会同杉木林站(1982-2009)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
[16] 盛炜彤,范少辉.杉木人工林长期生产力保持机制研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
[17] Blanco J A, Seely B, Welham C, et al. Testing the performance of a forest ecosystem model(FORECAST) against 29 years of field data in a Pseudotsuga menziesii plantation[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2007,37(10):1808-1820.
[18] Wei X H, Blanco J A. Significant Increase in Ecosystem C Can Be Achieved with Sustainable Forest Management in Subtropical Plantation Forests[J]. Plos One, 2014,9(2):e89688. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0089688.
[19] 俞元春.杉木林土壤肥力变化和长期生产力维持研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,1999.
[20] 仲应喜.采伐剩余物管理方式对二代杉木幼林生产力的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2005.
[21] 杨靖宇.采伐剩余物处理方式对15年生杉木林碳、氮影响的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.
[22] 曹永康.不同采伐剩余物处理方式对二代杉木人工林生态系统碳储量的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2008.
[23] 胡振宏,何宗明,范少辉,等.采伐剩余物管理措施对二代杉木人工林土壤全碳、全氮含量的长期效应[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4205-4213.
[24] 王荣伟.不同营林措施对杉木人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.
[25] 郭剑芬.皆伐火烧对杉木林和栲树林碳、氮动态的影响[D].福建厦门:厦门大学,2006.
[26] 王伟峰.杉木及其混交林碳储特征与森林经营长期影响的模拟研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2014.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01