PDF Download

[1]WANG Delu,GAO Biao.Evolution Relationship Between Regional Ecological Footprint and Economic Growth and Its Socioeconomic Driving Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):278-284.

Copy

Evolution Relationship Between Regional Ecological Footprint and Economic Growth and Its Socioeconomic Driving Factors

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 05 Page number: 278-284 Column: Public date: 2016-10-28

Title:: Evolution Relationship Between Regional Ecological Footprint and Economic Growth and Its Socioeconomic Driving Factors

Author(s):: WANG Delu¹, GAO Biao²; 1. School of Economics and Management, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng, Jilin 137000, China;
2. School of Geography Science, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng, Jilin 137000, China

Keywords:: ecological economics; ecological footprint; economic growth; sustainable development; STIRPAT model; driving factors; Baicheng City

CLC:: F062.2;X22

DOI:: -

Abstract:: A case study was conducted in Baicheng City of Jilin Province. Evolution relationship between regional ecological footprint and economic growth, and its socioeconomic driving factors are examined based on calculation and dynamic analysis of regional ecological footprint. The ecological footprint per capita, ecological capacity per capita and ecological deficit (surplus) were calculated based on the ecological footprint models from 2003 to 2013, their dynamic changes were analyzed, and the state of sustainable development was evaluated. Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) was used to analyze the evolution relationship between ecological footprint per capita and economic growth. The socioeconomic driving factors of ecological footprint per capita were studied based on STIRPAT model. The results indicate that ecological footprint per capita increased from 1.392 9 hm² per capita in 2003 to 2.967 0 hm² per capita in 2013, and ecological capacity per capita increased from 1.785 3 hm² per capita in 2003 to 3.064 6 hm² per capita in 2013. In the same period, ecological surplus decreased from 0.392 4 hm² per capita in 2003 to 0.097 6 hm² per capita in 2013 because the growth of the former was greater than the latter, and ecological deficit appeared in 2012 which its value was 0.046 8 hm² per capita, the state of sustainable development began to deteriorate. The evolution curve of ecological footprint per capita and economic growth was spoon-shape, and the turning point will appear in 2014, after 2014, ecological footprint per capita will decrease along with the economic growth. Population, comparable price per capita GDP, the unit GDP energy consumption, second industry ratio, urbanization rate, Engel coefficient were the socioeconomic driving factors on ecological footprint per capita, and their driving force indexes were 0.157 5, 0.164 7, 1.050 0, 0.471 9, 0.020 6 and 0.588 5, respectively. Baicheng City must take effective measures to optimize the industrial layout and energy structure, increase the strength of input and transformation in science and technology, develop ecological economy, strengthen farmland protection and improve the people’s ecology civilization, and then promote the regional sustainability of natural ecological and socioeconomic.

References:: [1] 钱易,唐孝炎.环境保护与可持续发展[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[2] 王艳,王力.生态足迹研究进展述评[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):114-120.
[3] Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environmental and Urbanization1992,4(2):121-130.
[4] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers, 1998.
[5] Van Vuuren D P, Bouwman L F. Exploring past and future changes in the ecological footprint for world regions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2005,52(1):43-62.
[6] Senbel M, McDaniels T, Dowlatabadi H. The ecological footprint:a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2003,13(2):83-100.
[7] Galli A, Kitzes J, Niccolucci V, et al. Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint:A focus on China and India[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,17(3):99-107.
[8] 汪霞,张洋洋,怡欣,等.基于生态足迹模型的舟曲县生态承载力空间差异[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(5):687-691.
[9] 胡清宇,陆尤尤,龚士东,等.浙江文成县近10年生态足迹与生态可持续发展分析[J].浙江农业学报,2012,24(4):686-692.
[10] 顾康康,刘景双.吉林省生态足迹动态分析与预测[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2007,24(1):66-72.
[11] 李辉,李淑杰,姬冬梅,等.吉林省生态足迹的计算与动态分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(23):12706-12707.
[12] 方恺,沈万斌,董德明.能源足迹核算的改进与预测:以吉林省为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(10):1835-1846.
[13] 高标,崔凤午.吉林省生态足迹与生态承载力动态变化分析与预测研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,12(6):105-110,116.
[14] 鲁凤,徐建华,胡秀芳,等.生态足迹与经济增长的定量关系及其社会经济驱动机制:以新疆为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2012,28(5):70-74.
[15] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N B, et al. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series:resolving conceptual challenges[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004,21(3):271-278.
[16] 高标,房骄,何欢.吉林省生态足迹动态变化与可持续发展状况评价分析[J].农业现代化研究,2013,34(1):95-99.
[17] 唐帅,宋维明.温州市生态足迹分析[J].城市问题,2014(1):35-39.
[18] Wackernagel M, Yount J D. The ecological footprint:an indicator of progress toward regional sustainability[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998,51(1/2):511-529.
[19] Ckossman G M, Krueger A B. Economic growth and the environment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110(2):353-377.
[20] 高标,许清涛,李玉波,等.吉林省交通运输能源消费碳排放测算与驱动因子分析[J].经济地理,2013,33(9):25-30.
[21] 许清涛,高标,房骄.吉林省经济增长与环境污染水平演进关系的实证研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):258-263.
[22] Ehrlich P R, Wolff G, Daily G C, et al. Knowledge and the environment[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,30(2):267-284.
[23] York R, Rosa E A, Dietz T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003,46(3):351-365.
[24] 焦文献,陈兴鹏,贾卓.甘肃省能源消费碳足迹变化及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2012,34(3):559-565.
[25] 王立群,李冰,郭轲.北京市生态足迹变化及其社会经济驱动因子分析[J].城市问题,2014(7):2-8.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01