PDF Download

[1]WANG Liang,PENG Qiyun,GEN Shaobo.Study on Tree Layer Biomass and Productivity in Forest in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):277-281,287.

Copy

Study on Tree Layer Biomass and Productivity in Forest in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 04 Page number: 277-281,287 Column: Public date: 2016-04-28

Title:: Study on Tree Layer Biomass and Productivity in Forest in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains

Author(s):: WANG Liang¹, PENG Qiyun¹, GEN Shaobo²; 1. Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China;
2. China Power Engineering Consulting(Group) Corporation Northeast Electric Power Design Institute, Changchun 130021, China

Keywords:: biomass; productivity; forest age; stand type

CLC:: S718.55⁺6

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the forest management inventories in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains in 2003 and 2013, and by using relative growth method, we analyzed the biomass and productivity of various forest types in Lushihe Forest Bureau. The results showed that the average of biomass was 175.07 t/hm², and the natural forest biomass was higher than the plantations. Conifer species and the slow accumulation of broad tree species in natural forest have strong capabilities to yield biomass, while biomass of artificial Korean pine forest is the highest, which is on the red pine plantation. With the growth of different types of forest age of stand, biomass trend was different. With age increase of more than half of the growth forest types, biomass gradually increased; other forest types changed irregularly. Average productivity of all forest types in Lushihe Forest Bureau was 5.00 t/(hm²·a), and the natural forest biomass was lower than the plantations. The most productive plantation is artificial Korean pine forest, which is related to nursing, while the productivity of natural coniferous forest is the highest.

References:: [1] 冯宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[2] 罗云建,张小全,王效科,等.森林生物量的估算方法及其研究进展[J].林业科学,2009,45(8):129-133.
[3] 蔡烁.金钩岭林场三种森林类型生物量研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
[4] 敬文茂,刘贤德,赵维俊.祁连山典型林分生物量与净生产力研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2011,12(6):81-85.
[5] 宁波.樟子松人工林结构动态及生物量的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2007.
[6] 安慧,上官周平.密度对刺槐幼苗生物量及异速生长模式的影响[J].林业科学,2008,44(3):151-155.
[7] 王云霓,熊伟,王彦辉.宁夏六盘山三种针叶林初级净初级生产力年际变化及其气候因子响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4808-4817.
[8] 王培娟,谢东辉,张佳华.基于过程模型的长白山自然保护区森林植被净第一性生产力空间尺度转换方法[J].生态学报,2007,27(8):3215-3223.
[9] 申贵仓,张旭东,张雷.蜀南苦竹林生态系统碳储量与碳汇能力估测[J].林业科学,2013,49(3):78-84.
[10] 杨金明,范文义,李明泽,等.长白山林区森林生物量变化定量驱动分析[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):47-52.
[11] 杨丽韫,罗天祥,罗松涛.长白山原始阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林及其次生林细根生物量与垂直分布特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(9):3609-3618.
[12] 齐麟,与大炮,周旺明,等.采伐对长白山阔叶红松林生态系统碳密度的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(10):3065-3073.
[13] 徐振邦,李昕,戴洪才.长白山阔叶红松林生物生产量的研究[J].森林生态系统研究,1985(5):33-48.
[14] 姜萍,叶吉,吴刚.长白山阔叶红松林大样地木本植物组成及主要树种的生物量[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27:112-115.
[15] 李明泽.东北林区森林生物量遥感估算及分析[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2010.
[16] 汪金松,张春雨,范秀华,等.臭冷杉生物量分配格局及异速生长模型[J].生态学报,2011,31(14):3918-3927.
[17] 董利虎.黑龙江省主要树种相容性生物量模型研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2012.
[18] 邢邵朋.吉林森林[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1988.
[19] 王淼,关德新,王跃思,等.长白山红松针阔叶混交林生态系统生产力的估算[J].中国科学:D辑,2006,36(A01):70-82.
[20] 赵俊卉.长白山云冷杉混交林生长模型的研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2010.
[21] 唐凤德,韩士杰,张军辉.长白山阔叶红松林生态系统碳动态及其对气候变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(6):1285-1292.
[22] 闫平,冯晓川.原始阔叶红松林碳素储量及空间分布[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(5):23-25.
[23] 谷会岩,代力民.人为干扰对长白山红松针阔叶混交林粗木质残体的影响[J].林业科学,2006,42(10):1-5.
[24] 方升佐,田野.人工林生态系统生物多样性与生产力的关系[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(4):1-5

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01