PDF Download

[1]KANG Peipei,ZHA Xuan,LIU Jiaming,et al.Analysis of Influence of Different Vegetation Planting Patterns on Soil Erosion on the Red Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):15-18,22.

Copy

Analysis of Influence of Different Vegetation Planting Patterns on Soil Erosion on the Red Soil Slope

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 04 Page number: 15-18,22 Column: Public date: 2016-04-28

Title:: Analysis of Influence of Different Vegetation Planting Patterns on Soil Erosion on the Red Soil Slope

Author(s):: KANG Peipei^1,2, ZHA Xuan^1,2, LIU Jiaming^1,2, CHEN Shifa^1,2, WANG Geng^1,2; 1. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Mountain Ecology Funded by Ministry of Science and Technology and Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350007, China;
2. Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Keywords:: granite red soil; soil and water loss; natural rainfall; vegetation coverage

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Through natural rainfall experiment, soil erosion process on the the typical granite red soil slope and influences of different vegetation planting patterns, rainfall and rainfall intensity on red soil slope surface runoff and sediment yield were analyzed, the effect of different planting patterns on the sediment and water storage efficiency and soil erosion were quantitatively examined under natural rainfall, and the test model was developed. The results show that:(1) under the same rainfall condition, different vegetation planting patterns of relationship between the size of the soil erosion is:the naked model > full cover planting patterns > strip planting patterns > ditch planting patterns; (2) when the average rainfall intensity is 0.3 mm/min, the whole cover planting pattern is superior to the furrow sowing grass planting patterns; when the average rainfall intensity is 0.6 mm/min, a trench planting grass planting patterns of water storage capacity is more significant; (3) the particle size of eroded soil is mainly focused on the less than 0.25 mm, it is the main cause of soil erosion and land degradation, particle sizes of sediment under different vegetation planting patterns are dominated by the sizes < 0.25 mm, the changing rule of the total amount of sediment particle size is as follows:the naked model > full cover planting patterns > strip planting patterns > ditch planting patterns. The effect of furrow sowing grass planting patterns on sediment reduction is the best, which can provide example for management of soil and water loss in the southern area.

References:: [1] 刘宝元,张科利,焦菊英.土壤可蚀性性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4):345-350.
[2] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响[J].地理学报,1999,54(3):241-246.
[3] 史德明.土壤侵蚀对生态环境的影响及防治对策[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(3):1-8.
[4] 何圣嘉,谢锦升,杨智杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):65-70.
[5] 谢锦升,杨玉盛,解明曙,等.亚热带花岗岩侵蚀红壤的生态退化与恢复技术[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):154-156.
[6] 查轩,唐克丽,张科利,等.植被对土壤特性及土壤侵蚀的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(2):52-58.
[7] 徐大兵,邓建强,上官力,等.不同覆盖措施对鄂西土地整治区水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):53-56.
[8] 陈小强,范茂攀,王自林,等.不同种植模式对云南省中部坡耕地水土保持的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):49-52.
[9] 冯秀,查轩,黄少燕.人工模拟降雨条件下花岗岩红壤坡面侵蚀过程与特征分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(1):19-23.
[10] 耿晓东,郑粉莉,刘力.降雨强度和坡度双因子对紫色土坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J].泥沙研究,2010,12(6):48-53.
[11] 余长洪,李就好,陈凯,等.强降雨条件下砖红壤坡面产流产沙过程研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):7-10.
[12] 黄少燕.红壤侵蚀退化地不同生态恢复措施对土壤养分影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):38-42.
[13] 孙佳佳,于东升,史学正,等.植被叶面积指数与覆盖度定量表征红壤区土壤侵蚀关系的对比研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1060-1066.
[14] 刘纪根,张昕川,李力,等.紫色土坡面植被覆盖度对水土流失影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):16-27.
[15] 查轩,黄少燕.植被破坏对黄土高原加速侵蚀及土地退化过程的影响[J].山地学报,2001,19(2):109-114.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01