PDF Download

[1]ZHOU Fujian,DAI Quanhou,NIE Linhong,et al.The Litter and Soil Characteristics of Different Vegetation Types in the Maotai Water Function Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):23-27.

Copy

The Litter and Soil Characteristics of Different Vegetation Types in the Maotai Water Function Areas

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 02 Page number: 23-27 Column: Public date: 2016-04-28

Title:: The Litter and Soil Characteristics of Different Vegetation Types in the Maotai Water Function Areas

Author(s):: ZHOU Fujian^1,2, DAI Quanhou¹, NIE Linhong¹, YU Lifei¹, PENG Xudong¹; 1. College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Management Office of Guizhou Science and Technology Demonstration Garden for Soil & Water Conservation, Guiyang 550002, China

Keywords:: Maotai water function areas; vegetation type; soil nutrients; litter

CLC:: S714.7

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Using the methods of field investigation and indoor analysis, we examined the litter and soil characteristics of several different vegetation types in the Maotai water function areas. Results showed that there were some differences in litter characteristics for different vegetation types, in which the litter storage, effective water holding capacity and maximum water holding capacity of cedar forests were the greatest, while the litter storage of Bambusa pervariabilis×Dendrocalamopsis oldhami Shelterbelt and the effective water holding capacity and maximum water holding capacity of imperata grass were the smallest; the water absorption rates of litter for different vegetation types decreased with a power function of time. As for the soil characteristics, nutrient contents of mixed forest were generally higher, and those of pine and white oak thickets were lower; the permeability of soil layer in cedar forests and mixed forest were stronger while that of imperata grass was the weakest.

References:: [1] 刘玉国,刘长成,李国庆,等.贵州喀斯特山地5种森林群落的枯落物储量及水文作用[J].林业科学,2011,47(3):82-88.
[2] 张振明,余新晓,牛健植,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.
[3] 彭云.不同森林类型水源涵养功能研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2008.
[4] 戴全厚,喻理飞,薛萐,等.植被控制水土流失机理及功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):32-36.
[5] 杨吉华,张永涛,李红云,等.不同林分枯落物的持水性能及对表层土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):141-144.
[6] 肖卫平,刘立斌,杨世海,等.贵州茅台水源功能区植物群落的分类和排序[J].贵州农业科学,2012,40(6):34-38.
[7] 邹翔,薛小红,赵健.赤水河流域水土流失特点与分区防治研究[J].长江科学院院报,2010,27(8):12-15.
[8] 曾丹娟,徐广平,黄玉清,等.北部湾经济区枯落物及其林下土壤持水能力研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):210-213,220.
[9] 唐洪辉,张卫强,严峻,等.南亚热带杉木林改造对土壤及凋落物持水能力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):47-53.
[10] 詹昭宁.中国森林立地类型[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
[11] 冷茂芳.仁怀市撑绿竹引种栽培研究[J].中国园艺文摘,2009,25(6):37-38.
[12] 孙修贵.中国主要城市降雨雨强分布和Ku波段的降雨衰减[M].北京:气象出版社,2004.
[13] 杜森,高祥照,全国农业技术推广服务中心.土壤分析技术规范[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[14] 国家林业局.森林土壤渗透性测定[S].LY/T1218-1999.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01