PDF Download

[1]Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):205-209.

Copy

Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 01 Page number: 205-209 Column: Public date: 2016-02-28

Title:: Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China

Author(s):: Ayinuer·Aini¹, Umut·Halik^1,2, Tayierjiang·Aishan^1,2, Florian Betz², Abudula·Abulizi¹, ZHANG Qiushuang³; 1. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Xinjiang University;Urumqi 830046, China;
2. Faculty of Mathematics and Geography, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt;Eichstaett 85071, Germany;
3. Tangshan Institute of Landscape Gardening, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, China

Keywords:: stakeholder; lower Tarim River; riparian forest; ecosystem services

CLC:: X171.4

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Since the 1950s, the ecological environment of the lower reaches of Tarim River had been seriously degraded by irrational human exploitation activities. From 2000 to 2013, the ecological water transferring to lower reaches of the Tarim River had positive effects on restoration and improvement the ecosystem services of riparian forest which is mainly composed of P. euphratica. We analyzed stakeholders’ cognition on desert riparian forest ecosystem services in the lower reaches of Tarim River through an questionnaire survey. The results showed that 88.1% of respondents had the profound understanding to the desert riparian forest ecosystem services， 7.8% of them did not any recognize, 84% of respondents confirmed that the riparian forest had the highest efficiency on preventing from desertification, while only 8.1% of them believed that other aspects such as offering building materials and animal feed were the most efficient. Respondents’ perceptions on the eco-environmental changes after water transporting revealed that the degree of improvements in the descending, in order: reduction of dust and sandstorms > weakened desertification > improvement in the vitality of P. euphratica > increased number of P. euphratica saplings > increased area of riparian forest. There are differences in the respondents’ attitude towards the payment for the implementation of water transporting. 15.4% of them hold ambiguous attitudes; 7.7% of them refused to pay, 36% of them were willing to pay less than 1% of their total income; 15.4% of respondents could pay 1% of their income, 12% of them were willing to pay 2% of the total income, 3.8% could pay 3% of their income, and only 7.8% were willing to pay more than 3% of their income. The investigation results indicated that the awareness and support of the informants to lower reaches of Tarim desert riparian forest ecosystem services were very high, and the social benefit of ecological water re-inflowing was obvious in the lower reaches of the Tarim River.

References:: [1] 欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
[2] 李有斌.生态脆弱区植被的生态服务功能价值化研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2006.
[3] Welp M, de la Vega-Leinert A, Stoll-Kleemann S, et al. Science-based stakeholder dialogues:Theories and tools[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(2):170-181.
[4] 左其亭,李静,马军霞.博斯腾湖向塔里木河输水风险分析方法[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(3):361-366.
[5] 徐海量,陈亚宁,李卫红.塔里木河下游生态输水后地下水的响应研究[J].环境科学研究,2003,16(2):19-23.
[6] 高前兆,樊自立.塔里木河流域的环境治理与水土保持生态建设[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):11-15.
[7] 阿依先木·司马义,吐尔逊·哈斯木,祖木拉提·伊布拉.人类活动对土地沙漠化的影响研究:以塔里木河下游为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):56-60.
[8] 付爱红,陈亚宁,李卫红.基于层次分析法的塔里木河流域生态系统健康评价[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1535-1544.
[9] Cheng Q. The protection of the ecologic environment of the green corridor in the lower reaches of the tarim river[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,1992,2(1):74-79.
[10] 陈亚宁,李卫红,陈亚鹏等.新疆塔里木河下游断流河道输水与生态恢复[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):538-545.
[11] 玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,艾力西尔·库尔班,等.胡杨冠幅对塔里木河下游应急生态输水的响应[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(9):1-3.
[12] Wang Y, Feng Q, Chen L, et al. Significance and effect of ecological rehabilitation project in inland river basins in northwest China[J]. Environmental Management,2013,52(1):209-220.
[13] 尚河英,尹忠东.塔里木河流域生态输水效益分析[J].水利科技与经济,2014,20(2):17-20.
[14] 邓铭江.塔里木河下游应急输水的水生态环境响应[J].水科学进展,2005,16(4):586-591.
[15] 陈亚宁,李卫红,陈亚鹏.新疆塔里木河下游断流河道输水与生态恢复[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):538-545.
[16] 徐海亮,王小平,叶茂,等.塔里木河下游生态输水效益的民意调查[J].地理研究,2007,26(2):347-354.
[17] 王士飞,包安明,王永琴,等.水情波动下2006-2011年塔里木河下游植被变化研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):131-135.
[18] 黄粤,包安明,王士飞,等.间歇性输水影响下的2001-2011年塔里木河下游生态环境变化[J].地理学报,2013,68(9):1251-1262.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01