[1]LIU Yanli,ZHOU Beibei,WANG Quanjiu,et al.Effects of Nano-carbon on the Migration of Cu(Ⅱ) in Loessal Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):62-66.
Copy
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
23
Number of periods:
2016 01
Page number:
62-66
Column:
Public date:
2016-02-28
- Title:
-
Effects of Nano-carbon on the Migration of Cu(Ⅱ) in Loessal Soil
- Author(s):
-
LIU Yanli1, ZHOU Beibei1, WANG Quanjiu1,2, TAN Shuai1
-
1. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-Hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Losses Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
-
- Keywords:
-
nano-carbon; Cu (Ⅱ); the cumulative infiltration; the wetting front; isothermal adsorption curve
- CLC:
-
S153
- DOI:
-
-
- Abstract:
-
Heavy metal pollution management is very important for the environmental improvement. Based on the disturbed one-dimensional soil column experiments, effect of nano-carbon on Cu (Ⅱ) migration process was studied in the lab. The main results showed as follows. (1)At the same equilibrium concentration, with the increase of nano-carbon contents, the Cu(Ⅱ) adsorption quantity increased. The maximum adsorption (Sm) fitted by the Langmuir equation was increased with the increase of nano-carbon contents. (2) Philip Formula could better describe the Cu(NO3)2 solution infiltration process for all the soil columns mixed well with the nano-carbon and nano-carbon applied at the top soil, as well as the wetting front advance curve followed the power function. (3) Cu(NO3)2 solution infiltration amount was reduced with the increase of nano-carbon content, while nano-carbon contents were low (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%), little effect on the cumulative infiltration was found between the nano-carbone mixed well with the soil and the nano-carbon applied at the subsurface. But when the nano-carbon content was as high as 5%, the variation was obvious, of which the nano-carbon mixed well with soil was significantly smaller. (4) Compared with the control soil, the nano-carbon could reduce the soil Cu(Ⅱ) content with these two methods and Cu(Ⅱ) contents in the surface soil were obviously higher than those in the deep soil. While nano-carbon content was low (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%), the difference of surface soil was small and little effect on the Cu(Ⅱ) content was found between the nano-carbon mixed well with the soil and the nano-carbon applied at the subsurface, while nano-carbon content was high (5%), the Cu(Ⅱ) content of surface soil of nano-carbon mixed with soil was significantly higher than that treated with nano-carbon applied at the top soil, but the Cu(Ⅱ) content in deeper soil presented little difference. As a result, nano-carbon has a good adsorption effect to Cu(Ⅱ), furthermore, nano-carbon applied at the top soil is an economic and effective way to absorb more Cu(Ⅱ).