PDF Download

[1]PENG Donghai,HOU Xiaolong,HE Zongming,et al.Community Characteristics of Different Vegetation Restoration Models in Gold Tailing Wasteland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):50-55.

Copy

Community Characteristics of Different Vegetation Restoration Models in Gold Tailing Wasteland

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 01 Page number: 50-55 Column: Public date: 2016-02-28

Title:: Community Characteristics of Different Vegetation Restoration Models in Gold Tailing Wasteland

Author(s):: PENG Donghai¹, HOU Xiaolong¹, HE Zongming¹, LIU Luqi¹, CAI Liping¹, LIN Jingwen¹, JIANG Ruirong², HUANG Fucai³, ZHONG Junhua³; 1. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Experiment Centre of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, Nanjing, Fujian 363600, China;
3. Zijin Mining Group Company Limited, Shanghang, Fujian 364200, China

Keywords:: Zijinshan; vegetation restoration; community characteristics; species diversity

CLC:: X171.4

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Plant selection of re-vegetation is important in the mining wasteland. Different restoration patterns were studied to understand the characteristics of vegetation community at Zijinshan gold mine in Fujian Province, China. The community structure, species composition and diversity under different 6 vegetation types (Pinus massoniana—Lespedeza bicolor—local flood turf, P. massoniana—Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Cinnamomum camphora-Lespedeza bicolor—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Vetiveria zizanioides—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Eucalyptus dunnii—local flood turf, P. massoniana-Liquidambar formosana—local flood turf) recovered since 2005 on slag wasteland were investigated in comparison with the undisturbed sites. The results showed that herbaceous plant is the dominant life forms in 6 different vegetation communities. Miscanthus floridulus, Ageratum conyzoides, Artemisia argyi, Bidens pilosa and Isachne globosa can serve as pioneer species during vegetation at preliminary succession. P. massoniana—Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis—local flood turf and P. massoniana—Eucalyptus dunnii—local flood turf species diversity were higher, the effect of vegetation restoration was better.

References:: [1] 杨修,高林.德兴铜矿矿山废弃地植被恢复与重建研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1932-1940.
[2] 王柏莉,仇昕昕,仇旭,等.我国石灰石矿山开采生态环境问题及环保对策建议[J].工程勘察,2011(4):48-51.
[3] 魏远,顾红波,薛亮,等.矿山废弃地土地复垦与生态恢复研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(2):107-114.
[4] Davies K W, Bates J D, Miller R F. Vegetation characteristics across part of the Wyoming big sagebrush alliance[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2006,59(6):567-575.
[5] 韩煜,赵延宁,陈琳,等.坡面植被恢复试验示范区植被群落特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):188-194.
[6] 王英宇,宋桂龙,韩烈保,等.京承高速公路岩石边坡植被重建3年期群落特征分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2013,35(4):74-80.
[7] 张笑培,杨改河,王和洲,等.黄土沟壑区不同植被恢复群落特征及多样性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):22-25.
[8] 罗双,孙海龙,刘冲,等.四川道路边坡自然恢复的植被多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):51-56,61.
[9] 徐远杰,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.伊犁河谷山地植物群落物种多样性分布格局及环境解释[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(10):1142-1154.
[10] 中华人民共和国林业行业标准.森林土壤分析方法[S].北京:国家林业局,1999.
[11] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2479-2486.
[12] 余海龙,顾卫,江源,等.半干旱区高速公路边坡不同年代人工植被群落特征及其土壤特性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):22-25.
[13] 张健,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复模式对沟谷地植物群落生物量和物种多样性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2):207-217.
[14] Cain M D, Shelton M G. Secondary forest succession following reproduction cutting on the upper coastal plain of southeastern Arkansas, USA[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2001,146(1/3):223-238.
[15] 王永健,陶建平,张炜银,等.茂县土地岭植被恢复过程中物种多样性动态特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1028-1036.
[16] Bradshaw A. Restoration of mined lands-using natural processes[J]. Ecological Engineering,1997,8(4):255-269.
[17] Sebastia M T, Casals P, Vojnikovi’c S, et al. Plant diversity and soil properties in pristine and managed stands from Bosnian mixed forests[J]. Forestry,2005,78(3):297-303.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01