PDF Download

[1]NIU Yong,WANG Bin,WANG Ling,et al.Study of Hydrological Functions of Four Types of Forest Stands in Rocky and Earthy Area of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):113-117,121.

Copy

Study of Hydrological Functions of Four Types of Forest Stands in Rocky and Earthy Area of Beijing

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 22 Number of periods: 2015 05 Page number: 113-117,121 Column: Public date: 2015-10-28

Title:: Study of Hydrological Functions of Four Types of Forest Stands in Rocky and Earthy Area of Beijing

Author(s):: NIU Yong¹, WANG Bin¹, WANG Ling², CAI Yongmao², ZHANG Zhiqiang¹; 1. Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Beijing Badaling Forest Farm, Beijing 102112, China

Keywords:: canopy interception; forest litter; hydraulics parameter; rocky and earthy area; hydrological functions

CLC:: S715

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Hydrological functions of three hydrological function layers of four forest types were investigated in forest stands of rocky and earthy area in Beijing. The traditional measurement methods were used to monitor throughfall, stemflow, interception loss, hydraulics parameters of forest litter and soil. The results indicated that the interception capacity of different vegetation was significantly different, with the maximal canopy interception of stand of mixed Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco and Cotinus coggygria Scop. (29.1%), followed by stands of Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco, Pinus tabuliformis, Acer truncatum. The stem flow ratio of stand Pinus tabuliformis was the highest (5.83%), which fitted the results obtained in arid and semi-arid region well. At the monthly scale, the maximal interception ratio appeared in June, followed July, August, October and May, and there was a positive correlation between interception and rainfall. The forest litter quantity of four stands ranged from 26.3 t/hm² to 246.0 t/hm², and the forest litter quantity of stand Pinus tabuliformis was much greater than the others (p < 0.05),followed by stands of mixed Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco and Cotinus coggygria Scop., Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco and Acer truncatum, as the same order of the maximum water holding capacity and available interception amount of forest litter. The soil porosity and Ks of stand of mixed Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco and Cotinus coggygria Scop. were greater than the other stands with the influence of material composition, mechanical composition, root, etc.

References:: [1] 赵海涛,程根伟,于新晓.山地森林生态系统水文循环与数学模拟[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[2] 王爱娟,章文波.林冠截留降雨研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):55-59.
[3] Rutter A J, Morton A J. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests:Ⅲ. sensitivity of the model to stand parameters and meteorological variables[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology,1977,14(2):567-588.
[4] Gash J H C. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1979,105(443):43-55.
[5] Gash J H C, Lloyd C R, Lachaud G. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1995,170(1/4):79-86.
[6] 裴铁璠,刘家冈,韩绍文,等.树干径流模型[J].应用生态学报,1990,1(4):294-300.
[7] 叶吉,郝占庆,姜萍.长白山暗针叶林苔藓枯落物层的降雨截留过程[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2859-2862.
[8] 刘兴明,刘贤德,车宗玺,等.祁连山青海云杉林区苔藓层对流域水文的影响[J].干旱区地理,2010,31(6):962-967.
[9] 朱兴武,张鸿昌,陈选,等.大通宝库林区森林枯枝落物层水文特征研究[J].青海农林科技,1993(4):1-6.
[10] 王金叶,田大伦,王彦辉,等.祁连山林草复合流域土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2005(3):144-147.
[11] 吕刚,吴祥云,雷泽勇,等.辽西半干旱低山丘陵区人工林地表层土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2008(5):204-208.
[12] 彭舜磊,陈昌东,刘沛松,等.豫西低山丘陵区不同植被恢复类型表层土壤入渗规律[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(7):1549-1552.
[13] 黄茹,黄林,何丙辉,等.三峡库区不同林草治理措施下土壤入渗特征研究[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(9):119-126.
[14] 张焜,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆四面山三种人工林林冠截留效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):201-204.
[15] Teklehaimanot Z, Jarvis P G, Ledger D C. Rainfall interception and boundary layer conductance in relation to tree spacing[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1991,123(3/4):261-278.
[16] Viville D, Biron P, Granier A, et al. Interception in a mountainous declining spruce stand in the Strengbach catchment(Vosges, France)[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1993,144(1/4):273-282.
[17] 张志强.森林水文:过程与机理[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[18] Putuhena W M, Cordery I. Estimation of interception capacity of the forest floor[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1996,180(1/4):283-299.
[19] Tietema A, Warmerdam B, Lenting E, et al. Abiotic factors regulating nitrogen transformations in the organic layer of acid forest soils:Moisture and pH[J]. Plant and Soil,1992,147(1):69-78.
[20] Dunne T. Field studies of hillslope flow processes[M]//Kirkby. Hillslopehydrolog. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1978.
[21] 何东宁,王占林,张洪勋.青海乐都地区森林涵养水源效能研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1991,15(1):71-78.
[22] 王贺年,余新晓,贾国栋,等.华北土石山区流域森林覆盖率对径流影响的定量分析[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2013,21(3):432-441.
[23] 蔡永茂,许兰霞,张咏.八达岭林场的分类经营评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(S1):57-62.
[24] 姚永刚,王玲,张立,等.北京市八达岭风景区树木物候研究[J].林业实用技术,2006(1):7-9.
[25] 刘千,王平,熊伟,等.六盘山北侧叠叠沟小流域几种典型植被群落的水文功能研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(4):193-199.
[26] 高开通,胡淑萍,刘鹏举,等.北京九龙山自然保护区典型林分枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013(5):160-164.
[27] 王薇,孟杰,虎胆·吐马尔白. RETC推求土壤水动力学参数的室内试验研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2008,31(1):99-102.
[28] 黄承标,梁宏温.广西亚热带主要林型的树干茎流[J].植物资源与环境,1994,3(4):10-17.
[29] 陈波,孟成生,赵耀新,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.
[30] 赵忠,李鹏,王乃江.渭北黄土高原主要造林树种根系分布特征的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(1):38-40.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01