PDF Download

[1]WU Yingying,WU Shaohua,ZHOU Shenglu,et al.Distribution of Land Ecological Environment and Its Response to Landuse Intensity in Kunshan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):201-205,209.

Copy

Distribution of Land Ecological Environment and Its Response to Landuse Intensity in Kunshan County

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 22 Number of periods: 2015 04 Page number: 201-205,209 Column: Public date: 2015-08-28

Title:: Distribution of Land Ecological Environment and Its Response to Landuse Intensity in Kunshan County

Author(s):: WU Yingying¹, WU Shaohua¹, ZHOU Shenglu¹, LIN Chen², ZANG Yuzhu¹, PENG Hui³; 1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
3. Jiangsu Institute of Land Surveying and Planning, Nanjing 210024, China

Keywords:: land ecological quality; intensity of landuse; spatial distribute; response; Kunshan County

CLC:: X826;F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: With the continuous development of social economy, human alteration to ecosystems is becoming more and more obvious. What’s more, the growing contradiction between people and land highlights the importance of scientific management and regulation of land. Landuse is a special behavior led by human to alter and utilize the land in order to achieve particular purposes. Kunshan County is a highly developed area with a large population. In order to pursue sustainable development, the quality of its land ecological environment has become considerable challenges. In this paper, we provided the complete ecological assessment of land use in 2012. Then, we analyzed the distribution of land ecological environment in Kunshan County, and offered its distribution. Finally, we made a thorough inquiry between land ecological environment and landuse intensity. Supported by statistical analysis, we got a negative correlation trend between those two, revealing the ecological quality of the land affected by the intensity of landuse. However, as a special kind of construction land, tourism sites had a high level of landuse intensity, while the protection from the government also contributed to the high ecological status of the land. On the other hand, two scores of the concentrated water areas in the downtown both show the low level.

References:: [1] 冯产京,林坚,胡振琪,等.2013年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2014年展望[J].中国土地科学,2014(1):3-19.
[2] 胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2565-2576.
[3] 梁国付,丁圣彦.气候和土地利用变化对径流变化影响研究:以伊洛河流域伊河上游地区为例[J].地理科学,2012,32(5):635-640.
[4] Su S, Li D, Yu X, et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai(China)based on catastrophe theory[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2011,25(6):737-746.
[5] Hua Y E, Yan M A, Limin D. Land ecological security assessment for Bai autonomous prefecture of Dali based using PSR model-with data in 2009 as case[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011(5):2172-2177.
[6] 余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):107-111.
[7] 郑敬刚,许淑娜,喻铮铮,等.中原经济区核心区土地资源生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):273-277.
[8] 余健,房莉,仓定帮,等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):260-266.
[9] De Lange H J, Sala S, Vighi M, et al. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment:A review and perspectives[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,408(18):3871-3879.
[10] 刘焱序,李春越,任志远.基于LUCC的生态型城市土地生态敏感性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):125-130.
[11] Abson D J, Dougill A J, Stringer L C. Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa[J]. Applied Geography, 2012,35(1):515-524.
[12] 李玉平,朱琛,张义文.河北省邢台市土地生态安全评价及可持续发展对策研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):116-120.
[13] 余光英,员开奇.武汉城市圈土地碳平衡适宜性评价及潜力分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):271-276.
[14] 舒帮荣,黄琪,刘友兆,等.基于变权的城镇用地扩展生态适宜性空间模糊评价:以江苏省太仓市为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):402-412.
[15] 程琳琳,娄尚,刘峦峰,等.矿业废弃地再利用空间结构优化的技术体系与方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(7):207-218.
[16] 邹丽丽,陈晓翔,何莹,等.基于逻辑斯蒂回归模型的鹭科水鸟栖息地适宜性评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(12):3722-3728
[17] 庄大方,刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):105-111.
[18] 赵兴国,潘玉君,丁生,等.中国省域土地利用可持续性评价及时空格局特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(3):196-204.
[19] 曲衍波.基于GIS的山区县域土地生态安全评价与土地利用优化调控研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2008.
[20] 戴靓.县域土地生态质量的空间分异及其主控因子识别[D].南京:南京大学,2013.
[21] 韩平,王纪华,潘立刚,等.北京郊区田块尺度土壤质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):228-234.
[22] 李晓倩,刘学录.土地评价指标权重赋值方法的比较分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(5):129-133.
[23] 戴靓,姚新春,周生路,等.长三角经济发达区金坛市土地生态状况评价[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):249-257.
[24] 张松林,张昆.空间自相关局部指标Moran指数和G系数研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2007,27(3):31-34.
[25] Luo H, Yang Y. Spatial pattern of hotel distribution in China[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2013,13(1):3-15.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01