[1]LI Jinchuan,WANG Xiang,YUE Jianying,et al.Evaluation on Soil Ecologic Fertility during Vegetation Succession in Antaibao Open Pit[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):66-71,79.
Copy
Evaluation on Soil Ecologic Fertility during Vegetation Succession in Antaibao Open Pit
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
22
Number of periods:
2015 01
Page number:
66-71,79
Column:
Public date:
2015-02-28
- Title:
- Evaluation on Soil Ecologic Fertility during Vegetation Succession in Antaibao Open Pit
- Keywords:
- vegetation restoration; soil physicochemical properties; soil enzymatic activity; soil microbe; ecologic fertility; Antaibao mine
- CLC:
- 153.6
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Antaibao open pit of Pingshuo is located in the northwest of Shanxi Province, where ecological environment is fragile on the Loess Plateau. Coal mining brought about more serious soil erosion and vegetation degradation. Ecological reclamation has been carried out since 1989 in Antaibao open pit, and there are 2000 acres with different models of artificial ecological reclamation. To provide scientific information for ecological reclamation under the fragile condition, soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic activity and microbe in different restoration patterns were tested in the Antaibao open pit. The results showed that there were significant effects on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity and microbe of vegetation types. The soil total fertility including physicochemical properties, enzyme actives and microbial characteristics were analyzed by principal component analysis. The results demonstrated that the highest soil fertility was in P.tabuliformis-R.pseudoacacia mixed forests. The reforestation would promote soil development and improve soil quality.
- References:
-
[1] 杨修,高林.德兴铜矿矿山废弃地植被恢复与重建研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1932-1940.
[2] 曹银贵,白中科,刘泽民,等.安太堡露天矿区土地类型变化研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(2):44-48.
[3] 毕如田,白中科,李华,等.基于RS和GIS技术的露天矿区土地利用变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(12):201-204.
[4] 黄丹勇.矿区土地复垦与生态环境恢复综述[J].湖南有色金属,2011,27(6):45-48.
[5] 台培东,李培军,贾宏宇,等.排土场边坡人工沙棘灌丛对风滚植物的固留作用及生态效应[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):833-836.
[6] 王改玲,王小利,李东方,等.安太堡露天煤矿复垦地土壤养分相关研究[J].煤矿环境保护,2001,15(5):25-27.
[7] 魏忠义,马锐,白中科,等.露天矿大型排土场水蚀特征及其植被控制效果研究:以安太堡露天煤矿南排土场为例[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):164-167.
[8] 钟爽,刘志斌.生态学在露天煤矿排土场生态恢复中的应用[J].露天采矿技术,2006(2):51-53,55.
[9] 李晋川,王文英.安太堡露天煤矿新垦土地植被恢复的探讨[J].河南科学,1999(增刊):92-95.
[10] 台培东,孙铁珩,贾宏宇,等.草原地区露天矿排土场土地复垦技术研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):90-93.
[11] 章家恩,廖宗文.试论土壤的生态肥力及其培育[J].土壤与环境,2000,9(3):253-256.
[12] 魏媛,喻理飞,张金池,等.退化喀斯特植被恢复过程中土壤生态肥力质量评价:以贵州花江喀斯特峡谷地区为例[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(1):61-67.
[13] 薛建春,蔡松.生态脆弱矿区土地利用动态变化研究:以平朔矿区为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):204-207.
[14] Kelly J J, Tate R L. Effects of heavy metal contamination and remediation on soil microbial communities in the vicinity of azincsmelter[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,1998,27(3):609-617.
[15] 关松萌.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.274-339.
[16] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤微生物试验法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[17] 王奇赞,徐秋芳,姜培坤,等.天目山毛竹入侵阔叶林后土壤细菌群落16S rDNA V3区片段PCR的DGGE分析[J].土壤学报,2009,46(4):662-669.
[18] Lisa A M, Brenda S, Michael G S. Comparative denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of fungal communities associated with whole plant corn silage[J]. Journal of Microbial,2001,47(9):829-841.
[19] 张庆费,宋永昌,由文辉.浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(2):174-178.
[20] 骆伯胜,钟继洪,陈俊坚.土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究[J].土壤,2004,36(1):104-106.
[21] 黄耀,沈雨,周密,等.木质素和氮含量对植物残体分解的影响[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(2):183-188.
[22] 安韶山,黄懿梅,郑粉莉.黄土丘陵区草地土壤脲酶活性特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):233-237.
[23] 张焱华,吴敏,何鹏,等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力关系的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(34):11139-11142.
[24] Bosalo D A, Girvan M S, Verchot L. Soil microbial community response to land use change in an agricultural landscape of western Kenya[J]. Micorbial Ecology,2005,49(1):50-62.
[25] 夏北成,Zhou J, Tiedje J M. 土壤细菌类克隆群落及其结构的生态学特征[J].生态学报,2001,21(4):574-578.
[26] 周涛,戴全厚,吴秀芹,等.喀斯特山区退耕还林地土壤养分效应及评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):71-74.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01