PDF Download

[1]WANG Yan-pei,CHAI Shou-xi,CHEN Yu-zhang,et al.Effect of Different Treatments with Straw Returning on Soil Water Content in Arid Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):164-170.

Copy

Effect of Different Treatments with Straw Returning on Soil Water Content in Arid Field

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 21 Number of periods: 2014 06 Page number: 164-170 Column: Public date: 2014-12-28

Title:: Effect of Different Treatments with Straw Returning on Soil Water Content in Arid Field

Author(s):: WANG Yan-pei¹, CHAI Shou-xi¹, CHEN Yu-zhang², YANG Chang-gang¹, CHANG Lei¹, TAN Kai-min¹, CHENG Hong-bo³, HUANG Cai-xia⁴, PANG Lei¹; 1. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. Institute of Agricultural Science, Bijie, Guizhou 551700, China;
3. College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China;
4. College of Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Keywords:: straw returning; film mulching; soil water content; northwest rain-fed agriculture

CLC:: S512.1⁺1;S152.7⁺5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: To comprehensively understand effects of straw returning on the soil water content, the effect of straw returning with wheat and maize under the different treatments on soil moisture of winter wheat in northwest rainfed agriculture was studied at different stages and soil layers in a field experiment conducted in Tongwei county, Gansu province. The results show that the differences in soil water content with straw returning in the early were larger than those in the late at different stages, the soil water content in winter period was the highest, the differences in soil water content in upper soil were greater than those in subsoil, which were the highest in 120—150 cm soil layer. In general, the difference was decreasing with the development of growth period and the soil layer depth. At the meantime, the yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of other treatments with straw returning were higher than those of control except for the treatment of wheat straw returning with no-express and no-film, in which the yield and WUE of treatment with maize straw returning were higher than with wheat straw returning, and straw returning with compaction and no-film were higher than with no-compaction and no-film. The soil water content of straw returning was higher than CK, that of straw returning with film was higher than with no-film. The combination of straw returning and film mulching was the best practice in terms of the rate of increasing yield and the soil water conversation.

References:: [1] 张小红,张绪成.半干旱区旱地不同覆盖方式对糜子耗水和产量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):29-33.
[2] Baye Berihum.Effect of mulching and amount of water on the yield of tomato under drip irrigation[J].Journal of Horticulture and Forestry,2011,3(7):200-206.
[3] 袁玲,张宣,杨静,等.不同栽培方式和秸秆还田对水稻产量和营养品质的影响[J].作物学报,2013,39(2):350-359.
[4] 李世清,李东方,李凤民,等.半干旱农田生态系统地膜覆盖的土壤生态效应[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2003,31(5):22-29.
[5] 王进鑫,黄宝龙,罗伟祥.局部覆盖条件下干旱过程对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(9):106-110.
[6] Wang SS,Deng GY.A study on the mechanism of soil temperature in creasing under plastic mulch[J].Agriculture Science China,1991,24(3):74-78.
[7] 李世清,李凤民,宋秋华,等.半干旱地区地膜覆盖对作物产量和氮素效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):205-209.
[8] 薛少平,朱琳,姚万生,等.麦草覆盖与地膜覆盖对旱地可持续利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(6):71-73.
[9] 翟胜,梁银丽,王巨媛,等.地表覆盖对日光温室黄瓜生长发育及生理特性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(2):73-77.
[10] 王婷,丁宁平,周海燕.秸秆还田方式对全膜双垄沟播玉米产量及土壤水分的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2013(11):22-24.
[11] 杨大晋.旱地玉米覆盖秸秆的增产效应研究[J].贵州农业科学,1996(5):15-20.
[12] 张玉铭,马永清.麦秸覆盖夏玉米对其苗期生长发育的生化他感作用研究初报[J].生态学杂志,1994,13(3):70-72.
[13] 卫新菊.小麦化感作用及其应用[J].小麦研究,2005,26(2):25-29.
[14] 宋淑亚,刘文兆,王俊,等.覆盖方式对玉米农田土壤水分、作物产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):210-212,217.
[15] 高亚军,李生秀.旱地秸秆覆盖条件下作物减产的原因及作用机制分析[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(7):15-19.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01