[1]TIAN Xiao-song,CHEN Long,ZHOU Rui-rong,et al.Effects of Different Forms of Stem Plants on Soil and Water Conservation and Nutrient Retention in Karst Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):64-68,73.

Copy

Effects of Different Forms of Stem Plants on Soil and Water Conservation and Nutrient Retention in Karst Areas

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 21 Number of periods: 2014 04 Page number: 64-68,73 Column: Public date: 2014-08-28

Title:: Effects of Different Forms of Stem Plants on Soil and Water Conservation and Nutrient Retention in Karst Areas

Author(s):: TIAN Xiao-song^1,3, CHEN Long², ZHOU Rui-rong², ZHENG Jie-bing^1,3; 1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Exogenic Mineralization and Mine Environment, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Fertilizer of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550006, China;
3. Chongqing Research Center of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Safe Mining, Chongqing 400042, China

Keywords:: karst areas; soil and water conservation; nutrient retention

CLC:: S157.2;S543

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The soil and water conservation and nutrient retention of different planted vegetation were studied in this experiment,including Ficus pumila, Iris lactea var chinensis, Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis and Blank,by setting up 4 types of runoff plots on the 30° slope. Furthermore, based on the this study, the quantitative relationships between soil and water conservation benefits and nutrientretention benefits were discussed. The results showed that average vegetation coverage of Ficus pumila, Iris lactea var chinensis and Hedera nepalensis var.sinensis was up to 53.1%, 62.8% and 60%, respectively. Ficus pumila, Iris lactea var chinensis and Hedera nepalensis var.sinensis have the effect of soil and water conservation,but there is a significant difference in soil and water conservation effect with different planted vegetation. Ficus pumila, Iris lactea var chinensis and Hedera nepalensis var.sinensis have the effect of nutrient retention including TP, DP, TN, NO₃^--N, NH₄⁺-N and K The retention benefits of TP, DP, TN, NO₃^--N, NH₄⁺-N and K in the runoff plots with Ficus pumila were up to 0.58,0.64,0.54,0.86,0.64 and 0.54, respectively. The retention benefits of TP, DP, TN, NO₃^--N, NH₄⁺-N and K in the runoff plots with Iris lactea var chinensis were 0.76,0.64,0.68,0.78,0.53 and 0.56, respectively. The retention benefits of TP, DP, TN, NO₃^--N, NH₄⁺-N and K in the runoff plots with Hedera nepalensis var.sinensis were 0.72,0.75,0.61,0.83,0.45 and 0.58, respectively. The correlation analysis revealed that Pearson correlation coefficients between soil and water conservation benefits and nutrient retention benefits were significantly correlated, which implied that soil and water conservation is an effective way to control the nutrients in soil.

References:: [1] 李鹏,李占斌,张兴昌.草灌植被拦蓄径流和泥沙有效性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):32-34.
[2] 孙铁军,刘素军,武菊英,等.6种禾草坡地水土保持效果的比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):158-162.
[3] 米艳华,潘艳华,沙凌杰,等.云南红壤坡耕地的水土流失及其综合治理[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):17-21.
[4] 刘斌,罗全华,常文哲,等.不同林草植被覆盖度的水土保持效益及适宜植被覆盖度[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(6):68-73.
[5] 王川.人工牧草种植对坡地水土流失的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2009:1-39.
[6] 杨明德.论喀斯特环境的脆弱性[J].云南地理环境研究,1990,2(1):21-29.
[7] 熊康宁,黎平,周忠发.喀斯特石漠化的遥感GIS型研究:以贵州省为例[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.
[8] 林昌虎,朱安国.贵州喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀与防治[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):109-113.
[9] 林昌虎,解德蕴,涂成龙,等.贵州山区坡耕地综合利用与整治[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):211-213.
[10] Kuylenstierna J L,Bjorklund G,Najlis P.Sustainable water future with global implications:everyone's responsibility[J]. Natural Resources Forum,1997,21(3):181-190.
[11] 蒋太明,陈旭晖.耕种方式对黄壤旱耕地绿肥生长发育和土壤水分的影响[J].贵州农业科学,1993,5(3):33-36.
[12] 张兴奇,詹可志.论农村能源建设在贵州喀斯特山区水土保持中的作用[J].中国水土保持,2008(11):19-21.
[13] 陈旭晖,周长华,周丕东,等.生物梯化的水土保持措施效应研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(2):163-167.
[14] 王济,王世杰,陈曦,等.旱坡地水土保持耕作技术应用的研究[J].西南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,25(6):530-534.
[15] 罗海波,钱晓刚,刘方,等.喀斯特山区退耕还林(草)保持水土生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):31-34.
[16] 刘超,刘济明,蒙朝阳,等.竹类在水土保持中的作用-以小蓬竹为例[J].现代农业科技,2009(14):276-278.
[17] 周素萍,张兴奇,张科利,等.贵州喀斯特地区不同生物措施的水土保持效果[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(4):127-130.
[18] 罗林,胡甲均,姚建陆.喀斯特石漠化坡耕地梯田建设的水土保持与粮食增产效益分析[J].泥沙研究,2007(6):8-13.
[19] 夏锦慧,陈旭晖,王文华.施肥对香根草篱长势及护土效果的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2002,30(5):31-32.
[20] 彭绍云,顾祝军,修平.南方红壤试验小区乔灌草多年水土保持效应比较[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):25-29.
[21] 苏均和.Duncan多重比较及数据补缺法及其应用[J].上海统计,2003(3):23-24.
[22] 顾祝军.水蚀区"林下流"发生机理与植被恢复度的遥感监测研究[D].南京:中国科学院南京土壤研究所,2008.
[23] Kinnell P I A. Event soil loss, runoff and the universal soil loss equation family of models:a review[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,385(1):384-397.
[24] Xu X L, Ma K M, Fu B J, et al. Influence of three plant species with different morphologies on water runoff and soil loss in a dry-warm river valley, SW China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,256(4):656-663.
[25] 字淑慧,吴伯志,段青松,等.非洲狗尾草防治坡耕地水土流失效应的研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):183-185.
[26] 杨吉华,武善举,王彭,等.葛藤保持水土效益的研究[J].山东林业科技,1990(4):37-40.
[27] 范淑英,吴才君.野葛对红壤坡地水土保持和改良土壤效应的研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):141-143.
[28] 谢颂华,郑海金,杨洁,等.南方丘陵区水土保持植物措施减流效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):35-38.
[29] 曾伯庆,马文中,李俊义,等.人工草地植被度对产流产沙影响的研究[C]//晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律实验研究文集.北京:水利电力出版社,1990.
[30] 张光辉,梁一民.模拟降雨条件下人工草地产流产沙过程研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,10(3):56-59.
[31] 张朝阳,许桂芳,周凤霞,等.10种藤本植物边坡水土保持效应研究[J].中国水土保持,2008(10):39-41.
[32] 陈磊,李占斌,李鹏,等.黄土高原人为加速侵蚀下水土与养分流失耦合研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):7-11.
[33] 徐泰平,朱波,汪涛,等.不同降雨侵蚀力条件下紫色土坡耕地的养分流失[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):139-144.
[34] 马琨,王兆骞,陈欣,等.不同雨强条件下红壤坡地养分流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):16-19.
[35] 唐春霞,姚军,何丙辉.紫色土坡耕地磷素径流流失特征分析[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,35(6):1028-1033.
[36] 刘佳,范昊明,周丽丽,等.春季解冻期降雨对黑土坡面侵蚀影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,13(4):64-67.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01