PDF Download

[1]FAN Chen-chen,XU Mo,WANG Mei,et al.Comparative Analysis on the Disappearance of River and Underground River along the Xuda Railway in the South of Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):264-268.

Copy

Comparative Analysis on the Disappearance of River and Underground River along the Xuda Railway in the South of Sichuan Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 21 Number of periods: 2014 02 Page number: 264-268 Column: Public date: 2014-04-28

Title:: Comparative Analysis on the Disappearance of River and Underground River along the Xuda Railway in the South of Sichuan Province

Author(s):: FAN Chen-chen¹, XU Mo¹, WANG Mei¹, ZHAO Rui¹, YE Xian¹, XIA Xue-ping²; 1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster Prevention and Geological Environmental Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Sichuan Shutong Geotechnical Engineering Company, Chengdu 610000, China

Keywords:: hydrogeology; comparative analysis; south Sichuan; disappearance of river; underground river

CLC:: X143;TV131.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Both the disappearance of river and underground river are underground currents and the similar modern landscape. Though both of them drain in form of underground-flowing river exit, they are the different Karst hydrogeological phenomenon. Disappearance of river is the disappearance part of river in karst area while the underground river is the underground pipes with the main characteristics of river in karst area. They usually do not distinguish strictly in production and living and the only study about them is limited to the concepts, rarely studying about their characteristic differences. This paper analyzed 6 characteristics of 14 disappearance of river and 24 underground river, including the elevation of exit, stratum, structure, river system, water chemistry and space distribution. Based on the statistical results, there are large differences between them, especially in the elevation of exit, structure, river system, water chemistry and space distribution. Then this paper analyzes the reason for the existence of the differences. This result is helpful for maintaining the ecological environment balance, developing and making use of water resources effectively.

References:: [1] 杨益才,徐守平,杨昌辉,等.喀斯特伏流河段建库主要工程地质问题[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):83-89.
[2] GB12329-90.岩溶地质术语[S].1990.
[3] 李孝颐,张忠举,王正中,等.四川省筠连幅H-48-(33)叙永幅H-48-(34)区域水文地质普查报告[M].四川省地质局二0八地质队,1980:27-28.
[4] 陈叙伦,刘世青.川南喀斯特发育史探讨[J].成都地质学院学报,1984(2):44-52.
[5] 李扬红,邓英尔,于静,等.五指山隧道岩溶发育及涌水的特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):138-141.
[6] 王中美,廖义玲,李明琴,等.贵阳市水文地质条件及环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):226-233.
[7] 杨益才,徐守平,杨昌辉,等.喀斯特伏流河段建库主要工程地质问题[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):83-89.
[8] 王迪,许模,漆继红,等.滇东南丘北区峰丛-洼地地貌形态特征分析[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(3):239-245.
[9] 漆继红,许模,杨华云,等.川东铜锣山背斜-南温泉背斜温泉水力联系分析[J].人民长江,2011,42(11):5-9.
[10] 许模,王迪,漆继红.基于分形理论的喀斯特地貌形态分析[J].人民长江,2011,38(3):5-9.
[11] 曹嘉一弘.四川盆地盆周山地地下河发育分布规律统计分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2013.
[12] 刘卫华,刘际国,杨家松,等.锦屏二级水电站辅助洞西端岩溶发育特征研究[C]//第三届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集.2009:485-492.
[13] 王锡魁,王德.现代地貌学[Z].2009:126-127.
[14] 蒲俊兵,袁道先,蒋勇军.重庆市地下河的空间分布及水资源[J].水文地质工程地质,2009(2):34-39.
[15] 刘细元,马振兴,杨永革,等.宜春-新余一带岩溶基本特征及发育规律分析[J].华东理工学院学报,2006,29(2):127-132.
[16] 黄琨,武亚遵,万军伟.落马洞暗河发育特征及其洪涝成因分析[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):385-388.
[17] 尹辉,蒋忠诚,罗为群,等.西南岩溶区水土流失与石漠化动态评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):66-70.
[18] 孙晋玉,张强,许模,等.通海隧道施工涌突水灾害与环境影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):69-73.
[19] 刘建,刘丹.岩溶隧道建设引起的地下水环境负效应研究:以铜锣山隧道为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):268-271.
[20] 陈旭,许模,杜宇本等.保山隧道暗河管道系统及其对隧道影响研究[J].人民长江,2011,42(5):22-25.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01