PDF Download

[1]WEN Wen,ZHOU Bao-tong,HUANG Yong,et al.Research for Evaluation on Priority of Rural Residential Land Consolidation in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):289-295.

Copy

Research for Evaluation on Priority of Rural Residential Land Consolidation in Chongqing City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 06 Page number: 289-295 Column: Public date: 2013-12-28

Title:: Research for Evaluation on Priority of Rural Residential Land Consolidation in Chongqing City

Author(s):: WEN Wen^1,2, ZHOU Bao-tong¹, HUANG Yong^2,3, TIAN Jing⁴, LIU Xiao-bo¹; 1. School of Geography Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
2. State Key Lab of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
3. School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;
4. Land Resources and Real Estate Information Center of Chongqing, Chongqing 400015, China

Keywords:: rural residential land consolidation; priority evaluation; zoning; Chongqing City

CLC:: F320.3

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The further priority evaluation and partition of rural residential consolidation has important practical significance for guiding the rural residential consolidation planning orderly. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method are used to define the weights of nine indices, which are used for priority assessment. A case study of Chongqing is implemented to evaluate and sort the priority of 39 rural residential areas. The results showed that the difference for the priority index is significant with the value between 0.166 8 and 0.736 7, according to the research, priority of the whole study area could be distinguish into four grades: the prior consolidation zone (Level Ⅰ) includes 10 districts: Shuangqiao, Jiangbei, Jiulongpo, Nan’an, Yubei, Dadukou, Beibei, Shapingba, Changshou, and Bishan; the moderate consolidation zone (Level Ⅱ) consists of 8 districts: Rongchang, Yongchuan, Ba’nan, Jiangjin, Hechuan, Wanzhou, Dazu and Tongliang; the moderate consolidation zone (Level Ⅲ) contains 14 districts:Fuling, Zhongxian, Nanchuan, Liangping, Tongnan,Wansheng, Dianjiang, Kaixian, Shizhu, Qijiang, Fengdu, Xiush-an, Yunyang and Qianjiang; and the ecological consolidation zone(Ⅳ) comprises 7 districts:Youyang, Fengjie, Wuxi, Pengshui, Wulong, Wushan and Chengkou.

References:: [1] 郎海如.农村居民点整理模式综述[J].农村经济与科技,2010,21(8):53-54.
[2] 朱玉碧,郑财贵,李安乐.重庆市农村居民点整理潜力评价探讨[J].西南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2006,9(3):95-98.
[3] 文博,瞿忠琼.农村居民点整理的驱动机制研究:以江西省全南县为例[J].江西农业学报,2010,22(3):171-174.
[4] 张占录,张远索.基于现状调查的城市郊区农村居民点整理模式[J].地理研究,2010,29(5):891-898.
[5] 乔蕻强,刘秀华,李让恩.农村居民点用地整理现实潜力测算及分区:以重庆市丰都县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):222-225.
[6] 柳博会,严金明.煤炭城市农村居民点整理的驱动力与问题研究:以淮北市为例[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(4):91-94.
[7] 曲衍波,张凤荣,姜广辉,等.基于生态位的农村居民点用地适宜性评价与分区调控[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(11):290-296.
[8] 李岩,赵庚星,王瑷玲,等.土地整理效益评价指标体系研究及其应用[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):98-101.
[9] 叶艳妹,吴次芳.我国农村居民点用地整理的潜力、运作模式与政策选择[J].农业经济问题,1998(10):54-57.
[10] 关小克,张凤荣,赵婷婷,等.北京市农村居民点整理分区及整理模式探讨[J].地域研究与开发,2010,29(3):114-128.
[11] 林常春,张俊梅,许皞,等.农村居民点用地整理时序研究:以河北省卢龙县为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):115-125.
[12] 岳坤,张鹏辉,任倩.保定市农村居民点整理潜力评价分级探讨[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):170-174.
[13] 张正峰,赵伟.农村居民点整理潜力内涵与评价指标体系[J].经济地理,2007,27(1):137-140.
[14] 周飞,陈士银,吴明发,等.广东省农村居民点整理优先性评价与分区[J].地理与地理信息科学,2013,1(1):75-78,93.
[15] 韩书成,濮励杰.江苏土地利用综合效益空间分异研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(6):853-858.
[16] 郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(12):98-102.
[17] 刘彦随.中国新农村建设创新理念与模式研究进展[J].地理研究,2008,27(2):479-480.
[18] 王海鸿,马琼.甘肃省农村居民点用地整理分区及对策[J].经济地理,2010,12(12):2080-2085.
[19] 方颖,唐苏芹,张平,等.挂钩政策下东平县农村居民点整理模式与对策分析[J].山东国土资源,2009,10(10):4-6.
[20] 郎海如.浅析农村居民点整理中的土地权属问题及对策[J].安徽农学通报,2010,16(15):15-20.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01