PDF Download

[1]WANG Peng,KUANG Fu-min,DENG Yu-wu,et al.Assessment of Land Ecological Security in Red Soil Hilly Region of South Hunan—A Case Study of Hengyang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):243-248.

Copy

Assessment of Land Ecological Security in Red Soil Hilly Region of South Hunan—A Case Study of Hengyang City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 20 Number of periods: 2013 03 Page number: 243-248 Column: Public date: 2013-06-28

Title:: Assessment of Land Ecological Security in Red Soil Hilly Region of South Hunan—A Case Study of Hengyang City

Author(s):: WANG Peng¹, KUANG Fu-min^1,2, DENG Yu-wu¹, TIAN Ya-ping¹, OUYANG Shan-lan¹; 1. Department of Resources, Environment and Tourism Management, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, Hu’nan 421002, China;
2. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Hu’nan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hu’nan 411201, China

Keywords:: red soil hilly region in southern Hu’nan; land ecological security; evaluation system; entropy method; Hengyang City

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The index system of land ecological security of Hengyang City was constructed based on the 19 indicators that can reflect the characteristics of land use in red soil hilly region in south Hunan, such as soil erosion rate, management rate of degradation land and the percentage of sloping land>25°, etc. The land ecological security of Hengyang City from 2006 to 2010 was also evaluated by using the entropy method and index additive model. The result indicated that land ecological security index went upward in Hengyang City from 2006 to 2010, but the ecological security of land resources in the region was not optimistic. It was recommended that some policies in order to strengthen the people’s ecological safety awareness, to increase the controlling rate of soil erosion, to balance the process of urbanization and ecological environment construction, to establish a resource-saving society system for social production and consumption, to develop ecological agriculture, and to make full use of the existing resources in order to achieve sustainable economic and social development of Hengyang City on the basis of ecological security.

References:: [1] 陈西蕊,张蓉珍.基于P-S-R模型的陕西省土地资源生态安全动态评价[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(2):224-228.
[2] 范瑞锭,陈松林,戴菲,等.福建省土地利用生态安全评价[J].福建师范大学学报,2010,26(5):97-108.
[3] 许国平.中国土地资源安全评价研究进展及展望[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):276-279.
[4] 孙奇奇,宋戈,齐美玲.基于主成分分析的哈尔滨市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):234-238.
[5] 王鹏,赵莹,田亚平.基于GIS的衡阳市生态环境脆弱性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):24-29.
[6] 刘兰芳.红壤丘陵区生态退化的原因及生态恢复对策:以湖南省衡阳市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(12):5161-5162.
[7] 陈西蕊,张蓉珍.基于P-S-R模型的陕西省土地资源生态安全动态评价[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(2):224-228.
[8] 邓楚雄.武冈市土地资源生态安全评价研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2006.
[9] 杨春,何柯润,李灿斌.湖南省土地生态安全动态评价[J].工作探讨,2008,5(5):41-43.
[10] 左伟,王桥,王文杰,等.区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):67-71.
[11] 黄辉玲.土地资源安全评价的指标体系及其利用[J].农机化研究,2006(1):55-56.
[12] 叶亚平,刘鲁军.中国省域生态环境质量评价指标体系研究[J].环境科学研究,1999,13(3):33-36.
[13] 李波,张俊飚,罗小锋.湖北省土地资源生态安全的评价[J].统计与决策,2008(16):38-40.
[14] 李玉平,蔡运龙.河北省土地生态安全评价[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2007,2(3):1-6.
[15] 杨春红,张正栋,田楠楠,等.基于P-S-R模型的汕头市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):209-214.
[16] 张兵,金凤君,胡德勇.甘肃中部地区生态安全评价[J].自然灾害学报,2007,16(5):9-15.
[17] 李秀霞,张希.基于熵权法的城市化进程中土地生态安全研究[J].干旱区资境,2011,25(9):13-17.
[18] 汤洁,朱云峰,李昭阳.东北农牧交错带土地生态环境安全指标体系的建立与综合评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(1):119-124.
[19] 朱璠,冉瑞平.南充市土地生态安全评价[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(5):3037-3040.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01