[1]WANG Jia,CHEN Tian-tian,WANG Ling-yun,et al.Coordination Evaluation of Regional Intensive Construction Land Use and Urbanization[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):237-242,248.
Copy
Coordination Evaluation of Regional Intensive Construction Land Use and Urbanization
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
20
Number of periods:
2013 03
Page number:
237-242,248
Column:
Public date:
2013-06-28
- Title:
- Coordination Evaluation of Regional Intensive Construction Land Use and Urbanization
- Keywords:
- urbanization; intensive degree; coupling coordination degree; spatio-temporal; Tangshan City Hebei Province
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Urbanization is the inevitable product of socio-economic development. Different levels of urbanization reflect different regional construction land intensive degrees. Only by coordinated development of them can socio-economic development to be promoted. Based on the socio-economic and regional construction land data from 1999 to 2009 in Tangshan, Hebei province, the year of 2001, 2005 and 2009 is selected as the evaluation period. The coupling coordination degree is employed to measure the coordination of ‘urbanization- intensive regional construction land’ system in different cities. At last, we used spatial autocorrelation analysis to reflect spatiotemporal characteristics of the coupling coordination degrees. The results indicate that:(1) coupling coordination improves steadily, most areas present spiral trend of coupling coordination degrees, and their types are from low to high class; (2) synchronous coordination classes are becoming more and more, indicating low to high synchronization. But there are some unstable and slow development regions; (3) coupling coordination degrees effect more obvious spatial aggregation. Central city shows high spatial aggregation, while the southeast coastal areas like Leting county and Luannan county show low special gathering.
- References:
-
[1] Gill S E, Handley J F, Ennos A R, et al. Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns:a template for landscape planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2008,87(3):210-222.
[2] Kottmeier C, Biegert C, Corsmeier U. Effects of urban land use on surface temperature in Berlin:case study[J]. Journal of Urban Planning & Development,2007,133(2):128-137.
[3] 诸大建,刘冬华.管理城市成长:精明增长理论及对中国的启示[J].同济大学学报:社会科学版,2006,17(4):22-28.
[4] 薛俊菲,邱道持,卫欣,等.城镇土地集约利用水平综合评价探讨:以重庆市北碚区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2002,21(4):46-50.
[5] 王力,牛铮,尹君,等.基于RS和ANN的城市土地集约利用潜力评价[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(3):32-35.
[6] 聂艳,于婧,胡静,等.基于系统协调度的武汉城市土地集约利用评价[J].资源科学,2009,31(11):1934-1939.
[7] 许君燕.城市化与土地资源利用的耦合协调机制研究[J].资源与环境,2010,26(10):929-933.
[8] 刘坚,黄贤金,赵彩艳,等.江苏省城市化发展与土地利用程度变化相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):108-111.
[9] 武京涛,涂建军,阎晓,等.中国城市土地利用效益与城市化耦合机制研究[J].城市发展研究,2011(8):42-63.
[10] 黄木易,程志光.区域城市化与社会经济耦合协调发展度的时空特征分析:以安徽省为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(2):77-81.
[11] 陈菁.基于图谱分析的福建省生态环境与城市化耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):163-167.
[12] 王筱明,吴泉源.城市化建设与土地集约利用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2001,11(S1):5-6.
[13] 刘浩,张毅,郑文升.城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价[J].地理研究,2011,30(10):1805-1817.
[14] 孙宇杰,陈志刚.江苏省城市土地集约利用与城市化水平协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2012,34(5):889-895.
[15] 薛俊菲,邱道持.2000年以来中国城市化水平的空间分异研究:以市域为单元的分析[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(10):136-142.
[16] 崔娟敏,季文光.基于AHP的土地集约利用水平模糊综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):122-125.
[17] Valerie I. The penguin dictionary of physics[M]. Beijing:Beijing Foreign Language Press,1996.
[18] 陈珏,雷国平.大庆市土地利用与生态环境协调度评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):116-120.
[19] 张路路,张悦国,刘瑞卿,等.河北省粮食单产区域差异特征演变格局及动因分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):192-197.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01