[1]ZHANG Lin,XUE Bing,LU Chen-yu,et al.Study on the Spatial Comparison and Measurement of Urban Sustainability Based on AHP & GIS Approach—A Case of 35 Municipalities in Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):86-91.
Copy
Study on the Spatial Comparison and Measurement of Urban Sustainability Based on AHP & GIS Approach—A Case of 35 Municipalities in Northeast China
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
20
Number of periods:
2013 02
Page number:
86-91
Column:
Public date:
2013-04-28
- Title:
- Study on the Spatial Comparison and Measurement of Urban Sustainability Based on AHP & GIS Approach—A Case of 35 Municipalities in Northeast China
- Keywords:
- human-natural relationship; sustainability assessment; spatial analysis model; Northeast China
- CLC:
- F592
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- By taking the 35 municipalities in Northeast China as studied cases, an principles-oriented index system was firstly proposed which contained 12 indicators categorized as 3 subsystems named as economic-, social- and ecological-subsystem, and then the developmental indices were calculated by employing the modified sustainability assessment model and analytic hierarchy process method, followed by index’ visual and exploring analysis, finally the spatial relationship and basic phenomenon into municipal scale sustainability measurement were concluded. The results showed that the successful transited industrial and new-emerging cities such as Shenyang and Dalian had higher sustainability, while lower sustainability was found in the outland and transiting cities, the effectiveness of the central city was significance which meant they had obvious influences on its satellite and surrounding cities, coupling and dual-shifting relationship existed among economic-, social- and ecological-subsystem. It is suggested that policies towards for sustainable development must closely combine with the local conditions and made appropriate methods in respect of macro level such as urban clusters and economic zone.
- References:
-
[1] Edwin Z. Over two decades in pursuit of sustainable development: influence, transformations, limits[J]. Environmental Development,2012,1(1):79-90.
[2] Charikleia K, Dimitris A. Developing countries’ energy needs and priorities under a sustainable development perspective: a linguistic decision support approach[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development,2010,14(4):330-338.
[3] 诸大建.可持续发展研究的3个关键课题与中国转型发展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(10):35-39.
[4] 郭滨,李铁松.南充城市生态可持续发展水平对比评价[J]水土保持研究,2005,12(1):193-198.
[5] Muhammet Y, Levent A, Peter B, et al. Politics and sustainable tourism development-can they coexist? voices from North Cyprus[J]. Tourism Management,2010,31(3):345-356.
[6] Volker M. 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,64(3):496-506.
[7] Joseph M, Andrew G. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernization[J]. Geoforum,2000,31(1):33-44.
[8] 官冬杰,苏维词.城市生态系统健康及其评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):70-73.
[9] 薛冰,陈兴鹏,张伟伟,等.区域循环经济调控机制研究[J].软科学,2010,24(8):74-77.
[10] 曾贤刚,周海林.全球可持续发展面临的挑战与对策[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(5):32-39.
[11] 杨雪梅,石培基,潘竟虎,等.甘肃省城市经济低碳度综合评价及其空间差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):52-58.
[12] 张新营,韩良,佟连军.吉林省生态经济区竞争力评价[J].地理研究,2004,24(16):975-980.
[13] 薛冰,李春荣,刘竹,等.全球1970—2007年碳排放与城市化关联机理分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2011,7(6):423-427.
[14] 鹿晨昱,马忠,张子龙,等.基于元指标理论的庆阳区域可持续发展研究[J].生态科学,2012,31(1):62-68.
[15] 鹿晨昱,陈兴鹏,薛冰.可持续发展评价中元指标的判定与拓展[J].统计与决策,2009(12):4-6.
[16] 薛冰,陈兴鹏,张伟伟,等.关于社区循环经济发展的理论探讨[J].华东经济管理,2011,170(2):28-32.
[17] 黑龙江省统计局.黑龙江统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[18] 吉林省统计局.吉林统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[19] 辽宁省统计局.辽宁统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[20] 杨冕,陈兴鹏,薛冰.中国西北地区可持续发展测度的比较[J].兰州大学学报,2009,45(5):49-51.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01