PDF Download

[1]SHAO Ji-xin.Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Footprint in the Karst Mountainous Area——Taking Bijie as a Case Study[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):210-213.

Copy

Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Footprint in the Karst Mountainous Area——Taking Bijie as a Case Study

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 05 Page number: 210-213 Column: Public date: 2012-10-20

Title:: Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Footprint in the Karst Mountainous Area——Taking Bijie as a Case Study

Author(s):: SHAO Ji-xin^1,2; 1. Institute of Environment, Resources and Disaster, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550018, China;
2. Department of Geography and Tourism, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550018, China

Keywords:: karst mountainous area; agriculture; carbon footprint; Bijie region

CLC:: F301.24;F062.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Carbon footprint provides new perspective of analysis of human activities effecting climate change. Therefore, this paper taking typical karst area-Bijie as an example, estimated the agricultural carbon emissions, carbon sink and carbon footprint. The results of the study showed that:(1) agricultural carbon emissions and carbon emissions intensity of eight counties had apparent differences in Bijie, QianXi was the most agricultural carbon footprint county, 86 165.37 t, the least was Zhijin County with 37 169.33 t of emission, the difference between those two counties was 48 996.04 t, the carbon emission of QianXi County was 1.32 times of that of Zhijin County. Qianxi and Nayong County had the biggest carbon emission intensity, the least was Zhijin, the sequence was Qianxi>Nayong>Jinsha>Dafang>Bijie >Hezhang>Weining>Zhijin;(2) agricultural carbon sink and carbon sink intensity of eight counties in Bijie had obvious difference, and agricultural carbon sink and carbon sink intensity of Weining and Nayong county had contrary trend;(3) carbon footprint had obvious differentiation, agricultural carbon footprint is at the surplus state, but the differences of carbon footprint of unit area and unit agricultural GDP were significant, the sequence of per unit area of carbon footprint was Weiningn>Nayong>Jinsha>Zhijin>Hezhang>Dafang>Bijie>Qianxi>Zhijin. Unit GDP of agriculture carbon footprint was Weining>Hezhang>Dafang>Jinsha>Qianxi>Bijie>Nayong>Zhijin. Weining had the largest per unit area of carbon footprint and unit agricultural GDP, while Zhijin was just opposite.

References:: [1] Streets D G, Jiang K J, Hu X L, et al. Recent reductions in China’s greenhouse gas emissions[J].Science, 2001, 294(5548):1835-1837.
[2] Soytasa U, Sari R, Ewing B T. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(3/4):482-489.
[3] 周玮, 周运超, 李进.喀斯特地区土壤有机碳及其碳转化酶研究[J].水土保持研究, 2009, 16(1):84-90.
[4] 孙建卫, 赵荣钦, 黄贤金, 等.1995-2005年中国碳排放核算及其因素分解研究[J].自然资源学报, 2010, 25(8):1284-1290.
[5] 杜宝华, 杨平, 仝乘风.农田土壤二氧化碳释放问题的研究[J].水土保持研究, 1996, 3(3):100-104.
[6] 朱孟郡, 严平, 宋阳, 等.风蚀作用下农田土壤碳损失的估算[J].水土保持研究, 2008, 15(1):226-230.
[7] 腾耀华, 张军以, 苏维词.三峡库区低碳农业发展模式与减排对策[J].水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2):226-231.
[8] 王微, 林剑艺, 崔胜辉, 等.碳足迹分析方法研究综述[J].环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(7):71-79.
[9] 李波, 张俊飚, 李海鹏.中国农业碳排放与经济发展的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 2(12):8-14.
[10] 黄祖辉, 米松华.农业碳足迹研究:以浙江省为例[J].农业经济问题, 2011(11):40-49.
[11] 耿涌, 董会娟, 郗凤明.应对气候变化的碳足迹研究综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(10):6-13.
[12] 段华平, 张悦, 赵建波.中国农田生态系统的碳足迹分析[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(5):203-209.
[13] 李波, 张俊飚, 李海鹏.中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(8):80-87.
[14] 谢淑娟.广东省农业生产能源消费碳排放分析及减排对策[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(28):17514-17516.
[15] 李克让.土地利用变化和温室气体净排放与陆地生态系统碳循环[M].北京:气象出版社, 2000.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01