PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Da-peng,FAN Shao-hui,CAI Chun-ju,et al.Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter Layers in Returning Farmland to Sympodial Bamboo Forests in Southern of Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):181-184,189.

Copy

Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter Layers in Returning Farmland to Sympodial Bamboo Forests in Southern of Sichuan Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 05 Page number: 181-184,189 Column: Public date: 2012-10-20

Title:: Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter Layers in Returning Farmland to Sympodial Bamboo Forests in Southern of Sichuan Province

Author(s):: ZHANG Da-peng, FAN Shao-hui, CAI Chun-ju, LIU Guang-lu, LIU Ya-di; International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Key Laboratory of Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100102, China

Keywords:: sympodial bamboo; litter; water-holding capacity; D. farinosus; B. pervariabilis×D. daii; B. rigida

CLC:: S715.5

DOI:: -

Abstract:: To investigate the litter amount and water-holding capacity under de-farming bamboo forests, Dendrocalamus(D) farinosus, Bambusa(B) pervariabilis ×Dendrocalamopsis(D) daii 3 and Bambusa(B) rigida, taking from Changning County of Sichuan Province, were determined in this paper. It could be concluded that thickness variation was from 33 mm to 51 mm and the litter amount changed from 6.88 t/hm² to 9.46 t/hm² under three different types of bamboo plantations. Litter amount of D farinosus was the most and that of B. pervariabilis ×D. daii was the least. Results also showed that dynamic changes of water-holding capacity, water absorption rate and immersion time of different litter was similar. The rapid changes were observed within 0～2 h, and then it slowly changed in the following six hours. The change stabilized after 8 h. Water-holding capacity, interception rate and the effective interception rate of D. farinosus were the best and the values were 36.52, 32.53, 27.05 t/hm², respectively. The next was B. rigida(30.33, 28.33,23.83 t/hm²) and the last was B. pervariabilis×D. daii(28.35, 25.89,21.63 t/hm²).

References:: [1] 于水强, 关庆伟.南京城市森林枯落物及土壤持水能力研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(34):17177-17179, 17206.
[2] 吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁, 刘向东, 等.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].水土保持学报, 1998, 12(2):23-28.
[3] Kawaadias V A, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, et a1. Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2001, 144(1/3):113-127.
[4] 杨继松, 刘景双, 于君宝, 等.三江平原沼泽湿地枯落物分解及其营养动态[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(5):1297-130.
[5] 薛立, 傅静丹, 郑卫国, 等.有无枯落物覆盖对加勒比松林地表径流及其K流失的影响[J], 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(4):510-514.
[6] 季冬, 关文彬, 谢春华.贡嘎山暗针叶林枯落物截留特征研究[J].中国水土保持科学, 2007, 5(2):86-90.
[7] 张昌顺, 范少辉, 谢高地.闽北毛竹林枯落物层持水功能研究[J].林业科学研究, 2010, 23(2):259-265.
[8] 高志勤, 傅懋毅.毛竹林, 等.不同森林类型枯落物水文特性的研究[J].林业科学研究, 2005, 18(3):274-279.
[9] 王彦辉, 刘永敏.江西省大岗山毛竹林水文效应研究[J].林业科学研究, 1993, 6(4):373-379.[ZK)]
[10] 王景燕, 胡庭兴, 龚伟, 等.川南坡地不同退耕模式对土壤团粒结构分形特征的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2010, 21(6):1410-1416.
[11] 张峰, 彭祚登, 安永兴, 等.北京西山主要造林树种林下枯落物的持水特性[J].林业科学, 2010, 46(10):6-14.
[12] 宫渊波, 陈林武, 罗承德, 等.嘉陵江上游严重退化地5种森林植被类型枯落物的持水功能比较[J].林业科学, 2007, 43(sp.1):12-16.
[13] 何亚平, 费世民, 蒋俊明, 等.四川长宁竹林凋落物的蓄水功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(5):35-41.
[14] 时忠杰, 王彦辉, 徐丽宏, 等.六盘山主要森林类型枯落物的水文功能[J].北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(1):91-99.
[15] 张振明, 余新晓, 牛健植, 等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(3):139-143.
[16] 莫菲, 于澎涛, 王彦辉, 等.六盘山华北落叶松林和红桦林枯落物持水特征及其截持降雨过程[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(6):2868-2876.
[17] 雷瑞德.秦岭火地塘林区华山松林水源涵养功能的研究[J].西北林学院学报, 1984, 1(1):19-33.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01