PDF Download

[1]JI Qi-fang,ZHANG Xing-qi,ZHANG Ke-li,et al.Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Slope Land in Karst Areas of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):1-5.

Copy

Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Slope Land in Karst Areas of Guizhou Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 04 Page number: 1-5 Column: Public date: 2012-08-20

Title:: Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Slope Land in Karst Areas of Guizhou Province

Author(s):: JI Qi-fang¹, ZHANG Xing-qi¹, ZHANG Ke-li², YANG Yong³, YANG Guang-xi³, GU Zai-ke³; 1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2. School of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
3. Guizhou Monitoring Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Guiyang 550002, China

Keywords:: karst; land types; runoff and sediment; Guizhou Province

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Soil erosion and rocky desertification strongly affect local sustainable development in karst area. In order to prevent and control efficiently soil erosion in karst area of Guizhou Province, runoff and sediment characteristics of different types of slope land were studied by means of runoff plots observation. Five types of runoff plots were set including commercial forest (pear trees), water conservation forest (Cinnamomum camphora), water conservation forest (cypress), slope farmland (crops) and bare slope land. The results showed that when the slope gradient was 13°, the slope land covered with crops and pear trees were good in protecting soil erosion, which could reduce runoff by 47.5% and 25.8%, respectively, and sediment yield by 78.5% and 58.9%, respectively. The slope land covered with Cinnamomum camphora and cypress were not significant in runoff reduction, while they could reduce sediment yield by 44.7% and 79.3%, respectively. When the slope gradient was 18°, the slope land covered with pear trees,Cinnamomum camphora, cypress and crops could reduce runoff by 45.8%, 4.9%, 3.8% and 16.6%, respectively, and sediment yield by 91.3%, 81.1%, 77.4% and 61.6%, respectively. When the slope gradients was 25°, sediment yield of the slope farmland was almost eight times more than that of the bare slope farmland. Runoff and sediment yield had power function relationship with rainfall (P), maximum rainfall intensity of 30 min (I₃₀) and slope gradients (s). The sediment yield of slope land met linear function with the runoff of slope land.

References:: [1] 徐燕,龙健.贵州喀斯特山区土壤物理性质对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):157-159.
[2] 韦启播.我国南方喀斯特区土壤侵蚀特点及防治途径[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(4):72-76.
[3] 林昌虎,解德蕴,涂成龙,等.贵州山区坡耕地综合利用与整治[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):211-213.
[4] 朱青,王兆骞,尹迪信.贵州坡耕地水土保持措施效益研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(2):219-229.
[5] 彭熙,李安定,李苇洁,等.不同植物篱模式下土壤物理变化及其减流减沙效应研究[J].土壤,2009,42(1):107-111.
[6] 周素萍,张兴奇,张科利,等.贵州喀斯特地区不同生物措施的水土保持效果[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(4):117-120.
[7] 彭文英,张科利.不同土地利用产流产沙与降雨特征的关系[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(4):25-29.
[8] 陈奇伯,寸玉康,刘芝芹,等.滇西高原不同地类坡面产流产沙规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(2):71-73.
[9] 徐宪立,张科利,庞玲,等.青藏公路路堤边坡产流产沙规律及影响因素分析[J].地理科学,2006,26(2):211-216.
[10] 陈强,常恩福,毕波,等.滇东南岩溶地区三种退耕还林模式的水土保持效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(5):1-4.
[11] 张会茹,郑粉莉,耿晓东.地面坡度对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):52-59.
[12] 田波,陈奇伯,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同处理坡面的产流产沙规律研究[J].西南林学院学报,2006,26(6):71-73.
[13] 贾志伟,江忠善,刘志.降雨特征与水土流失关系的研究[J].中国科学院水利部西北水土保持研究所专刊,1990(2):9-15.
[14] 刘艳,刘学全,崔鸿侠,等.长江中游低丘黄壤坡面地表产流产沙规律初探[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):149-153.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01