PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Xia,LIU Xiao-qing,WANG Ya-ping,et al.Evaluation on Benefits of Soil and Water Conversation in Ecological Function Region of Qinling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):86-90.

Copy

Evaluation on Benefits of Soil and Water Conversation in Ecological Function Region of Qinling Mountain

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 02 Page number: 86-90 Column: Public date: 2012-04-20

Title:: Evaluation on Benefits of Soil and Water Conversation in Ecological Function Region of Qinling Mountain

Author(s):: ZHANG Xia¹, LIU Xiao-qing¹, WANG Ya-ping¹, LI Zhan-bin^2,3, LI Peng²; 1. Shaanxi Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Xi’an 710061, China;
2. Key Lab of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology of MOE, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Keywords:: ecological function region in Qinling Mountain; soil and water conversation; benifit evaluation

CLC:: S157.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Base on related data about soil and water loss and governance of region in Qinling Mountain over ten years,suitable reasonable index was selected,suitable governance index system for soil and water conversation was established.It is the application of AHP,grey clustering method and Topsis method in the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of harnessing benefit of soil and water conversation in ecological function region of Qinling Mountain.The results show that dam land area,harnessed area and soil and water conservation forest are the main affecting factors in evaluation index system.The harness benefit demonstrated the increasing trend in this region.Each measure has begun to offer the efficiency.Ecological benefit is in benign development,and the function is gradual in improvement.The application of methods is beneficial to comprehensive management and macro-control in ecological functional region in Qinling Mountain and can provide the reliable basis for effective development of soil and water conversation measures.

References:: [1] 王筱明.生态位适宜度评价模型在退耕还林决策中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,23(8):113-116.
[2] 王晓峰,张晖,董小平,等.南水北调中线工程陕西水源区生态环境质量综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):230-232,236.
[3] 胡春宏,陈建国,孙雪岚,等.黄河下游河道健康状况评价与治理对策[J].水利学报,2008,39(10):1189-1196.
[4] 张光辉,土壤侵蚀模型研究现状与展望[J].水科学进展,2002,13(5):389-396.
[5] Saaty T L.The analytic hierarehy proeess[M].New York:McGraw Hill,Inc.1980:22-71.
[6] 王筱明.生态位适宜度评价模型在退耕还林决策中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,23(8):113-116.
[7] 吴旭,王绪本,阚瑷珂,等.基于层次分析法的流域生态决策评价系统[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,38(2):126-131.
[8] 厉彦玲.基于灰色聚类分析方法的生态环境质量综合评价模型[J].测绘科学,2007,32(5):77-79.
[9] Yuan J L,Zhong L.The Dynamic Grey Radial Basis Function Prediction Model and Its Applications[C]//Proceeding of IEEE ICICIC06,2006.
[10] 邓聚龙.灰预测与灰决策[M].修订版.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002.
[11] Lin Y,Liu S F.A systemic analysis with data(Ⅱ)[J].International Journal of General Systems(UK),2000,29(6):1001-1013.
[12] 刘斌,刘思峰,翟振杰,等.GM(1,1)模型时间响应函数的最优化[J].中国管理科学,2003,11(4):54-57.
[13] 朱明润,乔明叶,梁士奎,等.改进的TOPSIS模型在污水灌溉安全性评价中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2010,27(8):25-28.
[14] 方崇,苏超,黄伟军.基于信息熵大型灌区农业旱情的TOPSIS综合评价[J].中国农村水利水电,2011(5):74-76,79.
[15] 胡良军,张晓萍,杨勤科,等.黄土高原区域水土流失评价数据库的建立[J].水利学报,2002,33(1):81-85.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01