PDF Download

[1]LI Peng,LI Zhan-bin,ZHENG Yu.Influence of Land Utilization Types on Soil Erodiblity in Dry-hot Valley in Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):16-19.

Copy

Influence of Land Utilization Types on Soil Erodiblity in Dry-hot Valley in Jinsha River

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 04 Page number: 16-19 Column: Public date: 2011-08-20

Title:: Influence of Land Utilization Types on Soil Erodiblity in Dry-hot Valley in Jinsha River

Author(s):: LI Peng¹, LI Zhan-bin^1,2, ZHENG Yu¹; 1. Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology, Ministry of Education, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Keywords:: dry-hot valley; land use; soil erodibility

CLC:: S157;F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on field sampling and indoor determination, together with statistical analysis, soil erodobility of 7 land utilization types in dry-hot valley in Jinsha River was studied. Results indicated that in dry-hot valley, after the forest land of Camptotheca acuminate was changed to other land types, content of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and available nitrogen (AN) in soil on the other lands decreased obviously, available phosphorus (AP) and soil bulk density changed little, while available potassium increased a little. Generally, the impact on soil physic-chemical properties was relatively small after transforming to leucocephala land and abandoned grassland. Compared to the forest land of Camptotheca acuminate, soil erodibility on the other land types increased obviously, which was followed in the order:pepper land Leucaenaland

References:: [1] 杨万勤, 宫阿都, 何毓蓉, 等.金沙江干热河谷生态环境退化成因与治理途径探讨:以元谋段为例[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2001(4):37-39.
[2] Cui Peng, Wei Fangqiang, Li Yong.Sediment transported by debris flow to the lower Jinsha river[J].International Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, 14(4):67-71.
[3] 拜得珍, 潘志贤, 纪中华, 等.浅议金沙江干热河谷生态环境问题及治理措施[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2006, (4):50-51.
[4] Wischmeier W H, Mannering J V.Relation of soil properties to its erodibility[J].Soil Society of American Proceeding, 1969, 33(1):131-137.
[5] 宋阳, 刘连友, 严平, 等.土壤可蚀性研究评述[J].干旱区地理, 2006, 29(1):124-131.
[6] 陈明华, 周伏建, 黄炎和, 等.土壤可蚀性因子的研究[J].水土保持学报, 1995, 9(1):19-24.
[7] 海春兴, 赵烨, 陈志凡, 等.河北省坝上不同土地利用方式土壤可蚀性研究:以河北省丰宁县大滩乡三道河为例[J].中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(1):146-147.
[8] 徐燕, 龙健.贵州喀斯特山区土壤物理性质对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):157-159.
[9] Zhanga K L, Shub A P, Xu X L, et al.Soil erodibility and its estimation for ag r icultural soils in China[J].Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72:1002-1011.
[10] 郑海金, 杨洁, 喻荣岗, 等.红壤坡地土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].土壤通报, 2010, 42(2):425-428.
[11] 张科利, 彭文英, 杨红.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报, 2007, 44(1):7-13.
[12] 唐国勇, 李昆, 孙永玉, 等.干热河谷不同利用方式下土壤活性有机碳含量及其分配特征[J].环境科学, 2010, 31(5):1365-1371.
[13] 张兵, 蒋光毅, 陈正, 等.紫色丘陵区土壤可蚀性因子研究[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(2):354-358.
[14] 何永彬, 卢培泽, 朱彤.横断山-云南高原干热河谷形成原因研究[J].资源科学, 2000, 22(5):69-72.
[15] 唐国勇, 李昆, 张昌顺.施肥对干热河谷生态恢复区林木生长及土壤碳氮含量的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 23(4):185-189.
[16] 方海东, 纪中华, 杨艳, 等.金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林枯落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(5):52-55.
[17] 张春华, 李昆, 崔永忠.金沙江干热河谷上段退耕还林区造林树种选择[J].西南林学院学报, 2005, 25(1):20-23.
[18] 穆军, 李占斌, 李鹏.干热河谷水电站弃渣场植被恢复技术研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2010, 18(2):245-252.
[19] 杨振寅.元谋干热河谷植被景观动态与植被恢复研究[D].北京:中国林科院, 2007.
[20] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1999:13-169.
[21] Sharply A N, Williams J R.EPIC-Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator:1 Model Documentation[C]//US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No.1768.US Department of Agriculture, Temple, TX.1990.
[22] Zhu Bingbing, Li Zhanbin, Li Peng.Soil erodibility, microbial biomass, and physical-chemical property changes during long-term natural vegetation restoration:a case study in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Eco-logical Research, 2010, 25:531-541.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01