PDF Download

[1]ZHOU Xuan-de.Modeling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation of Turpan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):55-60.

Copy

Modeling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation of Turpan

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 03 Page number: 55-60 Column: Public date: 2011-06-20

Title:: Modeling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation of Turpan

Author(s):: ZHOU Xuan-de¹; 1. College of Recourse and Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Mministry of Education, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China

Keywords:: economic growth; environmental quality; environmental Kuznets Curve; Turpan region

CLC:: X22

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Economic development will always be accompanied by environmental problems,particularly in the phase of rapid economic growth,which is even more acute environmental problems,and seems irreconcilable contradiction between them.This paper selected Turpan region’s economic environmental data of from 2001 to 2008,established the regression model of the economic growth and environmental pollution on the basis of economic and environmental situation analysis,and analyzed the models.The results showed that the relationship between environmental quality and economic development in Turpan is close.The environmental quality indicators and the relationship between per capita GDP are inverted ’U’ pattern,’U’ pattern,and linear increasing.Integrated environmental quality and economic growth in the relationship was significantly reduced,that the quality of environment with economic growth has declined.A quantitative model not only reveals the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality,but also analyzes interactive process between economic growth and environmental quality.These are of great significance of the sustainable and rapid economic growth,and reduce the environmental pollution and waste of resources.Overall,urban environmental protection should be reinforced in the future urban development of Turpan region.In particular,the class should be undertaken in non-industrial environmental pollution control work.

References:: [1] 黄国强.新疆环境质量与经济增长关系的实证研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆财政大学,2007.
[2] 高迎春,佟连军,马延吉.吉林省经济增长和环境变化的动态关系[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(3):371-376.
[3] 吴玉萍,董锁成,宋键峰.北京市经济增长与环境污染水平计量模型研究[J].地理研究,2002,21(2):239-246.
[4] 朱智洺.环境库兹涅茨曲线在中国水环境分析中的应用[J].河海大学学报,2004,32(4):387-390.
[5] 吴玉萍,董锁成.北京市环境政策评价研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,2002,15(2):4-6.
[6] 高振宁,缪旭波,邹长新.江苏省环境库兹涅茨特征分析[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(1):41-43,59.
[7] 马树才,李国柱.中国经济增长与环境污染关系的Kuznets曲线[J].统计研究,2006(8):37-40.
[8] 刘耀彬,李仁东.武汉市“三废”排放的库兹涅茨特征及原因探析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2003,16(6):44-45.
[9] 王伟.陕西环境质量与经济增长关系的实证研究[D].西安:西北大学,2008.
[10] 邵波,陈兴鹏.甘肃省生态环境质量综合评价的AHP分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(4):29-32.
[11] 赵雪雁.甘肃省经济发展与环境质量的交互耦合关系[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(6):1-7.
[12] 杨凯,叶茂,徐启新.上海市城市废弃物增长的环境库兹涅茨曲线特征研究[J].地理研究,2003,22(1):60-66.
[13] 魏晓婕,杨德刚,乔旭宁.干旱区绿洲城市城市化与生态环境耦合[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(11):101-106.
[14] 甘正明.中国中部地区环境质量与经济增长关系的分析研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2010.
[15] 于维洋,许良.京津冀区域生态环境质量综合评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(9):61-62.
[16] 褚岗,王玉梅,来佑花.山东省社会经济与生态环境协调发展的综合分析与评价[J].鲁东大学学报:自然科学版,2008,24(2):185-188.
[17] 唐凤德,蔡天革,陈中林,等.辽宁省生态环境脆弱性评价与分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):225-228.
[18] 刘耀彬.中国城市经济增长与环境质量变化关系的实证研究[J].商业研究,2007(8):123-126.
[19] 张美英,杨林安,夏斌,等.潮州市经济发展与环境关系分析评价[J].江西农业学报,2009,21(7):189-191.
[20] 刘耀彬,陈斐,周杰文.城市化进程中的生态环境响应度模型及其应用[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(1):122-128.
[21] 张超,杨秉赓.计量地理学基础[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
[22] 李智,鞠美庭,刘伟,等.中国经济增长与环境污染响应关系的经验研究[J].城市环境与城市生态,2008,21(2):44-47.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01