PDF Download

[1]CHU Chun-jie,AN Chun-hua.Analysis on the Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Stability in Pingdingshan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):224-227,235.

Copy

Analysis on the Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Stability in Pingdingshan City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 01 Page number: 224-227,235 Column: Public date: 2011-02-20

Title:: Analysis on the Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Stability in Pingdingshan City

Author(s):: CHU Chun-jie^1,2, AN Chun-hua^3,4; 1. Department of Environment and Geography, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, He’nan 467000, China;
2. The Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Hilly Areas, Forestry Department of He’nan Province, Pingdingshan, 467000, China;
3. Institute of Geography, He’nan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450052, China

Keywords:: land use; landscape pattern; landscape stability; Pingdingshan city

CLC:: F301.24;TP79

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on remote sensing and GIS technology, combined with landscape pattern analysis methods, using remote sensing image, topographic maps, land-use maps and field survey data, the land-use landscape pattern of Pingdingshan city and its stability were analyzed by quantitative indicators. The results show that: The proportions of six landscape types from high to low were arable land, construction land, orchard and vegetable land, forest and grassland, water area and other industrial and mining land respectively. It formed the overall landscape features of which the urban construction land dominates the landscape of central city, the arable land and orchard and vegetable land dominate the landscape of suburbs. There existed certain differences in size, shape and degree of fragmentation between six landscape types, in which orchard and vegetable land and arable land have greater influences of fragmentation and edge effects. The overall landscape pattern was in moderate level of stable.

References:: [1] 马克明, 傅伯杰.北京东灵山地区景观格局及破碎化评价[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3):320-326.
[2] 张惠远, 倪晋仁.城市景观生态调控的空间途径探讨[J].城市规划, 2001, 25(7):15-18.
[3] 王云才.巩乃斯河流域游憩景观生态评价及持续利用[J].地理学报, 2005, 60(4):645-655.
[4] 黄奕龙, 陈利顶, 吴健生.我国城市景观生态学的研究进展[J].地理学报, 2006, 61(2):224.
[5] Forman R T T, Moore P N. Toword a throry of boundaries in landscape mosaics[M]//Castri F H. Landscape boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Divresity and Ecological Flows. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1990.
[6] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2002.
[7] 肖笃宁, 李秀珍, 高峻, 等.景观生态学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003.
[8] 何兴元.应用生态学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2004.
[9] 彭建, 王仰麟, 张源, 等.土地利用分类对景观格局指数的影响[J].地理学报, 2006, 61(2):157-168.
[10] 布仁仓, 胡远满, 常禹, 等.景观指数之间的相关分析[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(10):2764-2775.
[11] Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, et al. Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research, Living Rev[J]. Landscape Res., 2009, 3(1):1-28.
[12] 邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000.
[13] 叶延琼, 陈国阶.GIS支持下的岷江上游流域景观格局分析[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1):112-115.
[14] 隋欣, 童飞, 姚长青, 等.黄河流域青海片土地利用景观空间格局分析[J].水土保持通报, 2007, 27(2):123-127.
[15] 赵明华, 杨树佳, 牟文龙.山东半岛县域土地利用景观格局分析:以招远市为例[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(3):155-157.
[16] 赵雪雁.甘肃省生态承载力评价[J].干旱区研究, 2006, 23(3):506-512.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01