PDF Download

[1]XU Xue-hua,CUI Li-zhi,WANG Xi-wu,et al.Effect of Water-holding Capacity of Litter under Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ Forest in Different Mangement Measures in North Hebei Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):157-161.

Copy

Effect of Water-holding Capacity of Litter under Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ Forest in Different Mangement Measures in North Hebei Mountain Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 17 Number of periods: 2010 03 Page number: 157-161 Column: Public date: 2010-06-20

Title:: Effect of Water-holding Capacity of Litter under Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ Forest in Different Mangement Measures in North Hebei Mountain Area

Author(s):: XU Xue-hua¹, CUI Li-zhi², WANG Xi-wu², HUANG Xuan-rui¹, YU Shu-feng²; 1. College of Forestry, Agriculture University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China;
2. Mulan Forest Administration Bureau of Hebei, Weichang, Hebei 068450, China

Keywords:: Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ; management measures; litter; water holding capacity

CLC:: S727.21;S791.22

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Litter storage, maximal water-holding capacity, natural moisture content, effective dammed-up of litter of Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ man-made forest were studied in order to disclosure effect on water-holding capacity of litter of Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ forest under different treatments. The results showed that litter storage and water-holding capacity incresesd with time prolong, litter storage were that banding clear cutting>manual promote renew>gap selection cutting>closed promote vegetation>no-closed. And its rate of growth between 2.94% and 10.21% after closed 2 years. In general, the maximal water-holding capacity, natural moisture content, effective dammed-up, gap selection cutting>banding clear cutting>manual promote renew>closed promote vegetation>no-closed, which rate of growth one bye one between 0.48%, 0.13%, -0.14% and 5.58%, 10.40%, 5.82% after closed 2 years. Its approved closed measure was valued. These treatments are effectives measures for vegetation rebuild of Larix pricipis-rupprechtⅡ forest in North Hebei mountain area.

References:: [1] 王云琦, 王玉杰, 张洪江.重庆缙云山几种典型植被枯落物水文特性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18 (3):41-44.
[2] 庞学勇, 包维楷, 张咏梅.岷江上游中山区低效林改造对枯落物水文作用的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19 (4):119-123.
[3] 韩同吉, 裴胜民, 张光灿.北方石质山区典型林分枯落物层涵蓄水分特征[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 36 (2):275-278.
[4] 方海东, 纪中华, 杨艳鲜, 等.金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林枯落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19 (5):52-55.
[5] 张振明, 余新晓, 牛健植, 等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19 (3):139-143.
[6] 王佑民.中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 14 (4):108-113.
[7] 徐娟, 余新晓, 席彩云.北京十三陵不同林分枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 23 (3):189-193.
[8] 李红云, 杨吉华, 鲍玉海, 等.山东省石灰岩山区灌木林枯落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19 (1):44 -46.
[9] 林波, 刘庆, 吴彦, 等.亚高山针叶林人工恢复过程中凋落物动态分析[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15 (9):1491-1496.
[10] Kavvaadias V A, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, et al. Litter fall litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2001, 144 (1/3):113-117.
[11] 杨吉华, 张永涛, 李红云.不同林分枯落物的持水性能及对表层土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17 (2):141-144.
[12] 苏宁虎.森林植物凋落物动态的数学模型[J].林业科学, 1989, 25 (2):162-165.
[13] 林波, 刘庆.川西亚高山人工针叶林枯枝落叶及苔藓层的持水性能[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2002, 8 (3):234-238.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01