PDF Download

[1]DING Xin-xin,HONG Wei,CHEN Jian-zhong,et al.Comparison of Soil Water Physical Properties in Different Phyllostachys Pubescens Management Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):74-78,83.

Copy

Comparison of Soil Water Physical Properties in Different Phyllostachys Pubescens Management Model

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 03 Page number: 74-78,83 Column: Public date: 2009-06-20

Title:: Comparison of Soil Water Physical Properties in Different Phyllostachys Pubescens Management Model

Author(s):: DING Xin-xin^1,2, HONG Wei^1,2, CHEN Jian-zhong³, LI Jian^1,2, LIN Han^1,2, CHEN Can^1,2, WU Cheng-zhen^1,2; 1. College of Forestry of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Forest Ecological System Process and Management of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350002, China;
3. Forestry Bureau of Jianyang, Jianyang, Fujian 354200, China

Keywords:: forest soil; Phyllostachys heterocycla; soil water-physical properties

CLC:: S152.2;S714.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The soil physial properties among Phyllostachys heterocycla forests in Huangkeng town of the Jianyang city were analyzed in this paper.The results showed that the buck densities of the soil were in ascensive order as follow: mixed forest of Phyllostachys heterocycla and Cunninghamia 1anceolata < timber-forests of Phyllostachys heterocycla < mixed forest of Phyllostachys heterocycla and Camellia oleiferaPhyllostachys heterocycla and Vernicia fordii < shoot-use stand of Phyllostachys heterocycla. Soil total porosity of 5 different management models from 50.80V%～69.75V%, and non capillary porosity occupied nearly 1/5～2/7 of total porosity.The max moisture capacity, the capillary moisture capacity of the soil were in descensive order as follows: mixed forest of Phyllostachys heterocycla and Cunninghamia 1anceolata > mixed forest of Phyllostachys heterocycla and Camellia oleifera > timber-forests of Phyllostachys heterocycla>shoot-use stand of Phyllostachys heterocycla > mixed forest of Phyllostachys heterocycla and Vernicia fordii.

References:: [1] 王树力.不同经营类型红松林对汤旺河流域土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(3):90-93.
[2] 高志勤, 傅懋毅.不同毛竹林土壤水分物理性质的特征比较[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(2):162-165.
[3] 陈存及.福建毛竹林生态培育与生态系统管理[J].竹子研究汇刊, 2004, 23(2):1-4.
[4] 陈存及.毛竹林的生态培育[J].福建林学院学报, 1996, 16(2):188-192.
[5] 赵永艳.竹阔混交林土壤性状与分析[J].南京林业大学学报, 2007, 31(1):81-84.
[6] 黄启堂, 陈爱玲.不同毛竹林林地土壤理化性质特征比较[J].福建林业科技, 2006, 26(4):299-302.
[7] 王燕.江西大岗山3种林型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(1):151-173.
[8] 龚辉.建阳市森林结构调整的建模及仿真研究[J].福建林业科技, 2007, 27(2):66-69.
[9] 安兴琴, 陈玉春.浅议西北地区生态环境建设的气候效应[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2002, 20(1):116-119.
[10] 付为国, 李萍萍, 吴沿友.镇江内江湿地不同演替阶段植物群落小气候日动态[J].应用生态学报, 2006, 17(9)1699-1704.
[11] 郭静, 姚孝友.不同生态修复措施下鲁中山区土壤的水文特征[J].浙江林学院学报, 2008, 25(3):342-349.
[12] 秦嘉海, 金自学.祁连山不同林地类型对土壤理化性质和水源涵养功能的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1):92-94.
[13] 田大伦, 陈书军.樟树人工林土壤水文-物理性质特征分析[J].中南林学院学报, 2005, 25(2):1-6.
[14] 杨弘, 李忠.长白山北坡阔叶红松林和暗针叶林的土壤水分物理性[J].应用生态学报, 2007, 18(2):272-276.
[15] 张希彪, 上官周平.人为干扰对黄土高原子午岭油松人工林土壤物理性质的影响[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(11):3685-3695.
[16] 郝占庆, 王力华.辽东山区主要森林类型林地土壤涵蓄水性能的研究[J].应用生态学报, 1998, 9(3):237-241.
[17] 杨澄, 刘建军.桥山森林土壤水分物理性质的分析[J].陕西林业科技, 1998(1):24-27.
[18] 彭九生, 黄小春, 程平, 等.江西毛竹林土壤肥力变化规律初探[J].世界竹藤通讯, 2003, 1(4):37-42.
[19] 徐秋芳, 姜培坤.毛竹林地土壤养分动态研究[J].竹子研究汇刊, 2000, 19(4):46-50.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01