PDF Download

[1]LIU Jian-li,WANG Yan-hui,CHENG Li-li,et al.Study on Water Conversation with Infiltration Capacity of Different Types of Sites in the North Side of Liupan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):61-64.

Copy

Study on Water Conversation with Infiltration Capacity of Different Types of Sites in the North Side of Liupan Mountain

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 03 Page number: 61-64 Column: Public date: 2009-06-20

Title:: Study on Water Conversation with Infiltration Capacity of Different Types of Sites in the North Side of Liupan Mountain

Author(s):: LIU Jian-li^1,2, WANG Yan-hui², CHENG Li-li³, YU Xin-xiao¹, GUAN Wei⁴, DU A-peng²; 1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. The Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
3. Institute of Forestry and Pomology Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100093, China;
4. Research Institute of Tropical Forestry of CAF, Guangzhou 510520, China

Keywords:: Liupan mountain; site condition; soil water storage capacity; infiltration capacity; water resource conservation

CLC:: S715

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The investigation and comparision of soil hydrological and physical properties are carried out in the different types of sites such as Larix principis-rupprechtii, sunny grassland, semi-shady grassland, Ostryopsis davidiana, Hippophae rhamnoides in the north side of Liupan Mountain. The results show that these plots are different among soil bulk density, water holding capacity and the infiltration characteristic. The water holding capacity is between 520.3~585.82 mm; The initial infiltration coefficients and stable infiltration coefficients are between 0.76~9.71 mm and 0.50~2.93 mm/min respectively. After a comparison, it can be concluded that the plantation of Larix principis-rupprechti plays a good role in increasing soil infiltration and water-holding capacity in the studied region.

References:: [1] 黄承标, 梁宏温.广西不同地理区域森林土壤水文物理性质研究[J].土壤与境, 1999, 8(2):96-100.
[2] Singhl J S, Milchunas D G, Lauenroth W K. Soil water dynamic and Vegetation patterns in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Plant Ecology, 1998, 134:77-89.
[3] 李洪建, 王孟本, 柴宝峰.黄土高原土壤水分变化的时空特征分析[J].应用生态学报, 2003, 14(4):515-519.
[4] 周择福, 洪玲霞.不同林地土壤水分入渗和入渗模拟的研究[J].林业科学, 1997, 33(1):9-16.
[5] 潘紫文, 刘强, 佟得海.黑龙江省东部山区主要森林类型土壤水分的入渗速率[J].东北林业大学学报, 2002, 30(5):24-26.
[6] 余新晓, 赵玉涛, 张志强, 等.长江上游亚高山暗针叶林土壤水分入渗特征研究[J].应用生态学报, 2003, 14(1):15-19.
[7] 吴钦孝, 韩冰, 李秧秧, 等.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤水分人渗特征研究[J].中国水土保持科学, 2004, 2(2):1-5.
[8] 孙艳红, 张洪江, 程金花, 等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2):106-109.
[9] 郝占庆, 王力华.辽西山区主要森林类型土壤持水能力研究[J].应用生态学报, 1998, 9(3):237-241.
[10] 张社奇, 王国栋, 时新玲, 等.黄土高原油松人工林地土壤水分物理性质研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(1):60-64.
[11] 刘霞, 张光灿, 李雪蕾, 等.小流域生态修复过程中不同森林植被土壤入渗与贮水特征[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(6):1-5.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01