PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Biao,LI Wen-hua,XIE Gao-di,et al.Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Conservation Capacity of Forest Ecosystems in Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):240-244.

Copy

Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Conservation Capacity of Forest Ecosystems in Beijing

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 01 Page number: 240-244 Column: Public date: 2009-02-20

Title:: Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Conservation Capacity of Forest Ecosystems in Beijing

Author(s):: ZHANG Biao^1,2, LI Wen-hua¹, XIE Gao-di¹, XIAO Yu¹; 1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100039, China

Keywords:: forest ecosystem; soil conservation; soil erosion; Beijing

CLC:: S714.7

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In this paper, five factors such as vegetation cover ratio, the depth of forest floor, forest type, crown density and community structure were employed to comprehensively evaluate Beijing’s forest ecosystems effects on soil conservation. The results showed that 65.7% of forests in Beijing had the soil conservation ability at the middle and higher level, 16.8% at low level. The capacity of soil conservation in Beijing’s forests varied greatly in different districts (or counties), and was ranked in the descending order as follows: Shijingshan District, Yanqing County, Miyun County, Mentougou District, Fangshan District, Haidian Distrcit, Pinggu District, Changping District, Fengtai District, Huairou District, Chaoyang District, Shunyi District, Tongzhou District and Daxing District. The capacity of soil conservation in Beijing’s forests had a positive relationship with altitude, and was ranked from low to high as plain area (less than 100 m), hilly area (between 100 and 500 m), low mountain (between 500 and 800 m) and middle mountain (more than 800 m). With the increasing slope, the soil conservation ability of forests increased slightly, however, when slope more than 25 degree, there was little differences of soil conservation capacity. The capacity of soil conservation also varied with forest soil type, those forests with mountain meadow soil, mountain brown earth and cinnamon soil had the higher level, and paddy soil, alluvial soil, aeolian soil and meadow-boggy soil had lower level.

References:: [1] 韩富伟, 张柏, 宋开山, 等.长春市土壤侵蚀潜在危险度分级及侵蚀背景的空间分析[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1):39-43.
[2] 赵忠海.北京市密云水库北部地区土壤侵蚀情况的遥感调查[J].地质灾害与环境保护, 2005, 16(4):387-390.
[3] David P. Environmental and economic cost of soil erosion and conservation benefits[J].Science, 1995, 267:1117-1123.
[4] Lal R.Soil quality and food security: the global perspective[C]//La R.Soil quality and soil erosion, New York:CRC Press, 1999:3-15.
[5] 符素华, 段淑怀, 李永贵, 等.北京山区土地利用对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].自然科学进展, 2002, 12(1):108-112.
[6] Viles H A. The agency of organic beings: A selective review of recent work in biogeomorphology[C]//Thornes J B.Vegetation and erosion. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1990:5-24.
[7] 吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁.植被保持水土的基本规律和总结[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15(4):13-15.
[8] 符素华, 张卫国, 刘宝元, 等.北京山区小流域土壤侵蚀模型[J].水土保持研究, 2001, 8(4):114-120.
[9] 齐乌云, 马蔼乃, 周大良, 等.北京地区土壤水力侵蚀评估[J].水土保持研究, 2003, 10(3):137-139.
[10] 杨志新, 郑大玮, 李永贵.北京市土壤侵蚀经济损失分析及价值估算[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(3):175-178.
[11] 周为峰, 吴炳方, 李强子.官厅水库上游近20年土壤侵蚀强度时空变化分析[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12(6):183-186.
[12] 毕小刚, 段淑怀, 李永贵, 等.北京山区土壤流失方程探讨[J].中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4(4):6-13.
[13] 韦红波, 李锐, 杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J].植物生态学报, 2002, 26(4):489-496.
[14] 刘启慎, 李建兴.低山石灰岩区不同植被水保功能的研究[J].水土保持学报, 1994, 8(1):78-83.
[15] 罗伟祥, 白立强, 宋西德, 等.不同覆盖度林地和草地的径流量与冲刷量[J].水土保持学报, 1990, 4(1):36-43.
[16] 董荣万, 朱兴平, 何增化, 等.定西黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀规律研究[J].水土保持通报, 1998, 18(3):1-15.
[17] 张桂华, 姚凤梅.江西兴国土壤侵蚀动态的研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(1):53-56.
[18] 赖仕嶂, 吴锡玄, 杨玉盛, 等.论森林与土壤保持[J].福建水土保持, 2001, 13(2):11-14.
[19] 吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁, 刘向东, 等.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1998, 4(2):23-28.
[20] 侯喜禄, 白岗栓, 曹清玉.黄土丘陵区森林保持水土效益及其机理的研究[J].水土保持研究, 1996, 3(2):98-103.
[21] 余新晓.森林植被减弱降雨侵蚀能量的数理分析[J].水土保持学报, 1988, 2(2):24-30.
[22] 刘向东, 吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁.森林植被垂直截留作用与水土保持[J].水土保持研究, 1994, 1(3):8-13.
[23] 周国逸.几种常见造林树种冠层对降水动能分配及其生态效应分析[J].植物生态学报, 1997, 21(3):250-259.
[24] 雷瑞德.华山松林冠层对降雨动能的影响[J].水土保持学报, 1988, 2(2):31-39.
[25] 陈廉杰.乌江中下游低效林水土保持效益分析[J].水土保持通报, 1991, 22(6):18-22.
[26] 杨吉华, 刘凯生, 宫锐, 等.山丘地区森林保持水土效益的研究[J].水土保持学报, 1993, 7(3):47-52.
[27] 刘定辉, 李勇.植物根系提高土壤抗侵蚀性机理研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(3):34-37.
[28] 张清春, 刘宝元, 翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究, 2002, 9(4):96-101.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01