PDF Download

[1]FAN Xue-zhong,LI Yu-hui,JIAO Yuan-mei.Ecological Benefits Analysis of the Ecology Red-line Areas in Kunming District Before and After Changing the Non-ecological Use Lands into Ecological Ones[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(04):179-183,188.

Copy

Ecological Benefits Analysis of the Ecology Red-line Areas in Kunming District Before and After Changing the Non-ecological Use Lands into Ecological Ones

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 15 Number of periods: 2008 04 Page number: 179-183,188 Column: Public date: 2008-08-20

Title:: Ecological Benefits Analysis of the Ecology Red-line Areas in Kunming District Before and After Changing the Non-ecological Use Lands into Ecological Ones

Author(s):: FAN Xue-zhong, LI Yu-hui, JIAO Yuan-mei; College of Tourism and Geography Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650092, China

Keywords:: Red-line areas of ecology; ecological use land; ecological benefit; Kunming

CLC:: F323.1;X171

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Three schemes,concerning changing the non-ecological use lands into ecological ones in Red-line areas in Kunming district,were put forward.Applying the land use investigation data in 2005,this paper calculated and analyzed the ecological benefits value of the Red-line areas before and after changing the non-ecological use lands into ecological ones.The results showed that:(1) The gross ecological benefits value of current situation and that of per hm² were respectively 35.48×10⁸ Yuan and 2.16×10⁴ Yuan in the Red-line areas in 2005.(2)Compared with the current situation,the ecological benefits value of the Red-line areas would increase 9.8%,12.4% and 15% respectively if the low,medium and high scheme were implemented.(3) According to the low scheme,it would depend mainly on the districts and counties which farmland area has higher proportion in the Red-line areas to enhance the ecological benefits of the Red-line areas.Yiliang county and Panlong district are respectively the highest and lowest in raising value.(4) While according to the high scheme,it would rested on those districts and counties with higher proportion in area scale of the farmland and constructing use land in the Red-line areas to improve the ecological benefits of the Red-line areas.Wuhua district and Luquan county is the highest and lowest respectively in raising value.(5)The values computed with high and low scheme respectively represent the maximum and minimum of ecological benefits in the future in the Red-line areas,while the counterpart according to medium,could most realistically reflect the average condition of ecological benefits of the Red-line areas in the future.

References:: [1] 史培军, 江源, 王静爱, 等.土地利用/覆盖变化与生态安全响应机制[M].北京:科学出版社, 2004:1-9.
[2] 马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等.区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(4):761-768.
[3] 蔡运龙.中国西南喀斯特山区的生态重建与农林牧业发展:研究现状与趋势[J].资源科学, 1999, 21(5):37-41.
[4] Forster Ndubisi.Ecological planning:a historical and comparative synthesis[M].Baltimore and London:The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002:102-130.
[5] 冷疏影, 李秀彬.土地质量指标体系国际研究的新进展[J].地理学报, 1999, 54(2):177-185.
[6] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 王军.等.土地利用结构与生态过程[J].第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3):247-255.
[7] 角媛梅, 杨有洁, 胡文英, 等.哈尼梯田景观空间格局与美学特征分析[J].地理研究, 2006, 25(4):624-632.
[8] 张洪军, 刘正恩, 曹福存.生态规划-尺度、空间布局与可持续发展[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2006:158-169.
[9] 陈婧, 史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 41(5):536-540.
[10] Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 38(6):253-260.
[11] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(5):607-613.
[12] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2):189-196.
[13] 喻建华, 高中贵, 张露, 等.昆山市生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(2):213-217.
[14] 蔡邦成, 陆根法, 陈小骏.生态系统服务价值评估在南京市土地利用评价中的运用[J].环境保护科学, 2007, 33(4):104-106.
[15] 马育军, 黄贤金, 许妙苗, 等.江苏省沿海滩涂开发的生态系统服务价值响应研究[J].中国土地科学, 2006, 20(4):28-34.
[16] 陈仲新, 张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报, 2000, 45(1):17-22.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01