[1]SHI Hai-jing,LI Rui.Benefits Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation Project——A Case Study on “Changzhi”Project of Yangzi River in Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):40-43.
Copy
Benefits Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation Project——A Case Study on “Changzhi”Project of Yangzi River in Shanxi Province
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
15
Number of periods:
2008 02
Page number:
40-43
Column:
Public date:
2008-04-20
- Title:
- Benefits Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation Project——A Case Study on “Changzhi”Project of Yangzi River in Shanxi Province
- Keywords:
- “Changzhi”project; structure of land use; industry structure; ecological environment; economic benefit
- CLC:
- S157
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- The economic benefits evaluation of soil and water conservation project is of significance to the macro policies making in soil and water conservation.In this paper,based on the statistics data the comprehensive benefits of"Changzhi"project(Integrated management of soil and water loss in Yangtze River Watershed),including ecological,social and economic,were evaluated.The results showed that 5 348.09 km~2 land with soil and water loss have been controlled by soil and water conservation measures,which account for 76.77% of total area affected by soil and water loss,and the vegetation coverage increased by 21.57%;the area of cultivated land decreased by 33.7% and the area of wasteland decreased by 79.00%,while the woodland and the grassland increased by 33.31% and 38.78% respectively,the structure of land utilization became more rational gradually.As a result,people living standard improved significantly,and obvious ecological and social benefits have been achieved.By calculating the effects of the soil and water conservation measurers in terms of money,it showed that the ratio of benefit to expense is 1.61,and is 1.15 with sensitive analysis,both of them are bigger than 1;the net benefit is 33.200 5 million Yuan;the repaid years are 8.8 a(shorter than 10～12 a);the economic efficiency coefficient is 0.11(bigger than 0.08～0.1),all these economic parameters’ values are within"Water conservancy facility Project Economic Evaluation Standard".The results of this study will provide important implications for the soil and water conservation policy making.
- References:
-
[1] 魏兴萍,赵纯勇.重庆市南岸区水土保持规划经济效益预测分析[J].宜春学院学报,2004,26(6):61-64.
[2] 邓永光.浅谈水土流失治理的相关体系与治理模式[J].广西生物农业科学,2001,20(3):196-200.
[3] 陈国建,李锐,杨勤科.黄土高原水土保持的社会经济效应评价研究[J].农业资源与环境科学,2005,21(8):384-387.
[4] 王刚,李小曼,李锐.黄土高原水土保持社会效益评价:以定西地区为例[J].经济地理,2006,26(4):673-676.
[5] 杨柳春,陆宏芳.小良植被生态恢复的生态经济价值评估[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1423-1429.
[6] 李蕾,刘黎明.退耕还林还草工程的土壤保持效益及其生态经济价值评估:以固原市原州区为例[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):61-64.
[7] 李佩瑾,肖莉,张伟娜.湖南省土地利用经济效益评价[J].广东土地科学,2007,6(2):23-26.
[8] 陈云明,候喜禄,刘文兆.黄土丘陵半干旱区不同类型植被水保生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):57-61.
[9] 范兴科,蒋定生,黄国俊.黄土高原坡耕地水土保持措施效益评价试验研究(Ⅱ):坡耕地水土保持措施蓄水拦泥效益数学模型研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(3):1-6.
[10] 康玲玲,王云.黄土高原水土保持世界银行贷款项目实施的生态效益分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(4):198-200.
[11] 刘瑞禄,周国富,龙成昌.赤水市水土保持生态修复工程生态效益评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(6):82-86.
[12] 罗海波,钱晓刚,刘方.喀斯特山区退耕还林(草)保持水土生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):31-34.
[13] 蒋定生,范兴科,黄国俊.黄土高原坡耕地水土保持措施效益评价试验研究(Ⅰ):坡耕地水土保持措施对降雨入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(2):1-9.
[14] 蒋定生,黄国俊,范兴科.黄土高原坡耕地水土保持措施效益评价试验研究(Ⅲ):坡耕地水土保持措施综合效益评价[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(4):8-13.
[15] 李红全,靳阳阳.世行贷款昕水河流域水土保持项目建设评价[J].中国水土保持,2003(7):36-37.
[16] 廖晓勇,陈治谏,刘邵权.三峡库区坡耕地粮经果复合垄作技术效益评价[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):37-40.
[17] 王国庆,史忠海,李皓冰.水土保持措施对黄河水沙影响评价模型及效益评价研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2004,15(4):26-29.
[18] 刘利年,柳诗众.陕西省长治工程建设的现状与思考[J].水利发展研究,2003(5):40-42.
[19] 温仲明,焦峰.纸坊沟流域黄土丘陵区土地生产力变化与生态环境改善[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(8):91-95.
[20] Bao Zhangmo,Dang Jinqian.从本质上讲水土保持是经济行为[J].中国水土保持,2002(7):12-13.
[21] 王利文,胡志全.黄土丘陵区水土流失的环境经济学分析[J].国土与自然资源研究,2003(3):27-29.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01