PDF Download

[1]YIN Jia-yi,WU Yong-qiu,WANG Yan-zai.Error Analysis of Gullies’ Measurement with Different Methods[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):12-16.

Copy

Error Analysis of Gullies’ Measurement with Different Methods

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 15 Number of periods: 2008 01 Page number: 12-16 Column: Public date: 2008-02-20

Title:: Error Analysis of Gullies’ Measurement with Different Methods

Author(s):: YIN Jia-yi, WU Yong-qiu, WANG Yan-zai; MOE Engineering Center of Desertification and Blown-sand Control at Beijing Normal University, China Center of Desert Research at Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Keywords:: gully; gullies’ measurement; error analysis

CLC:: S157

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The authors mainly study the error of the gullies’ volume when they are measured with tapes, since it’s a very traditional method to measure gullies’ volume and area with tapes in the research of gully erosion.The error is mainly caused by limited precision of tapes and mechanism of measurement.The error caused by limited precision of tapes can be calculated with error transfer formula, and it was found that this kind of error does not depend on the distance between two neighbouring cross sections, but only relate to the tapes we used.The ratio of the error to gullies’ volume is less than 2%, which is the same for different gullies.The system error caused by mechanism of measurement is comprised of two parts.One is due to the nonidentity of cross sections, which has maximum value of 2%; the other one is caused by irregularity of cross sections.In order to minimize the system error caused by the nonidentity of cross sections, it’s important to decrease the distance between two neighbouring cross sections, which was about 10 meters in our outdoor measurement.Additionally, we also compare the gullies’ volume measured with tapes and GPS.It’s found that the error of single measurement is about 10%, and that the annual variations of gullies’ volume measured with tapes and GPS are almost the same.Therefore, it’s an effective method to measure annual variation of gullies’ volume with tapes.

References:: [1] 朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报, 1956, 4(2):99-15.
[2] 罗来兴.划分晋西、陕北、陇土黄土区域间沟和沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报, 1956, 22(3):201-221.
[3] Poesen J.Gully typology and gully control measures in the European loess belt in farm land erosion in temperate plains environment and hills[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993:221-239.
[4] 陈棣.漫川漫岗区沟道侵蚀的预防治理[J]黑龙江水专学报, 1992(增刊):64-66.
[5] 张金福, 李喜奎, 刘绪军.黑龙江黑土区沟壑侵蚀的危害及其治理[J].水土保持科技情报, 1999(3):52-53.
[6] 程宏, 伍永秋.切沟侵蚀定量研究进展[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(5):32-35.
[7] 李和信.忍看黑土付流波?:东北黑土区水土流失调查[N].人民日报, 2002-08-15.
[8] 伍永秋, 刘宝元.切沟、切沟侵蚀与预报[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2000, 8(2):134-142.
[9] 游智敏, 伍永秋, 刘宝元.利用GPS进行切沟侵蚀监测研究[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(5):91-94.
[10] 胡刚, 伍永秋, 刘宝元, 等.GPS和GIS进行短期沟蚀研究初探:以东北漫川漫岗黑土区为例[J].水土保持学报, 2004, 18(4):16-19.
[11] 曾贻伟, 龚德唇, 王书颖, 等.普通物理试验教程[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1989:29-37.
[12] 沙定国.实用误差理论与数据处理[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 1993:103-114.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01