PDF Download

[1]Wang Bo,Shu Xiaobo,Liao Fuqiang,et al.Spatitemporal of Land Use Conflicts and Multi-Scenario Simulation in Poyang Lake Area Based on Optimal Landscape Scale[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):336-347.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.041]

Copy

Spatitemporal of Land Use Conflicts and Multi-Scenario Simulation in Poyang Lake Area Based on Optimal Landscape Scale

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 04 Page number: 336-347 Column: Public date: 2024-06-30

Title:: Spatitemporal of Land Use Conflicts and Multi-Scenario Simulation in Poyang Lake Area Based on Optimal Landscape Scale

Author(s):: Wang Bo¹, Shu Xiaobo^1,2, Liao Fuqiang^1,2, Li Yu¹, Wan Zhiwei³; (1.School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; 3.School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China)

Keywords:: land use conflict; optimal landscape scale; multi-scenario simulation; PLUS model; Poyang Lake Area

CLC:: X24; F301.2

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.041

Abstract:: [Objective]Assess the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of regional land use conflict level can play an important role in the rational allocation of regional land resources. [Methods]A land use conflict measurement model was constructed based on the perspective of landscape ecological risk, and the optimal landscape scale setting method was used to set the appropriate analysis scale, analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of land use conflict in Poyang Lake Area from 1990 to 2020, and simulate the spatial pattern of land use conflict in 2035 with the help of the PLUS model in multiple scenarios. [Results]The overall spatial pattern of land use conflicts in Poyang Lake Area that the lakefront area significantly higher than the peripheral area, the southern area generally higher than the northern area, the plain area higher than the mountainous and hilly areas, and the values of conflicts on both sides of the river also significantly high. 1990—2005 conflict changes in urban areas not significant, the level of conflicts in the rural areas and the county junction areas higher, and the level of conflicts further aggravated in the period of 2005—2020, the conflicts of different areas in different scenarios simulated with the help of PLUS model. The level of conflict further aggravated in 2005—2020 overall spatial pattern of conflict under different scenarios in 2035 will continue the state in 2020, but the sustainable development scenario can effectively moderate the level of conflict and realize the balanced development of ecological protection and economic development. [Conclusion]From 1990 to 2020, the center of gravity of land use conflicts in the Poyang Lake shifted from rural and county boundary areas to urban areas, and the level of conflicts showed a rising trend. In the future, the sustainable development method, spatial development of the land in an orderly manner, and attention to the balance between ecological protection and economic development.

References:: [1]周德,徐建春,王莉.近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(2):21-29.
Zhou D, Xu J C, Wang L. Process of land use conflict research in China during the past fifteen years[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(2):21-29.
[2]孟鹏,冯广京,吴大放,等.“多规冲突” 根源与“多规融合” 原则:基于“土地利用冲突与‘多规融合'研讨会” 的思考[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(8):3-9,72.
Meng P, Feng G J, Wu D F, et al. Causes of the multiple-planning conflict and principle of multiple-planning integration:Reviews of the workshop “land use conflicts and multiple planning integration”[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(8):3-9,72.
[3]邹利林,刘彦随,王永生.中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(2):298-309.
Zou L L, Liu Y S, Wang Y S. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(2):298-309.
[4]陈竹安,冯祥瑞,洪志强,等.南昌市土地利用的空间冲突风险评估及分区优化研究:基于“三生空间” 视角[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(3):533-545.
Chen Z A, Feng X R, Hong Z Q, et al. Research on spatial conflict calculation and zoning optimization of land use in Nanchang City from the perspective of “three living spaces”[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021,30(3):533-545.
[5]Steinhäußer R, Siebert R, Steinführer A, et al. National and regional land-use conflicts in Germany from the perspective of stakeholders[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,49:183-194.
[6]杨永芳,安乾,朱连奇.基于PSR模型的农区土地利用冲突强度的诊断[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(11):1552-1560.
Yang Y F, An Q, Zhu L Q. Diagnosis based on the PSR model of rural land-use conflicts intensity[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(11):1552-1560.
[7]Lin G, Fu J Y, Jiang D. Production-living-ecological conflict identification using a multiscale integration model based on spatial suitability analysis and sustainable development evaluation:A case study of Ningbo, China[J]. Land, 2021,10(4):383.
[8]闵婕,汪洋,白茹月,等.基于多目标适宜性的山地城市土地利用潜在冲突研究:以重庆市綦江区为例[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,35(3):82-89,150.
Min J, Wang Y, Bai R Y, et al. The research on identification of land use potential conflict based on multiobjective suitability evaluation on mountainous city:A case study of Qijiang district of Chongqing municipality[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University(Natural Science), 2018,35(3):82-89,150.
[9]Jiang S, Meng J J, Zhu L K, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern of land use conflict in China and its multilevel driving mechanisms[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,801:149697.
[10]彭佳捷,周国华,唐承丽,等.基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1507-1519.
Peng J J, Zhou G H, Tang C L, et al. The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region based on ecological security—a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012,27(9):1507-1519.
[11]蒙吉军,江颂,拉巴卓玛,等.基于景观格局的黑河中游土地利用冲突时空分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(9):1553-1562.
Meng J J, Jiang S, Labazhuoma, et al. The spatial and temporal analysis of land use conflict in the middle reaches of the Heihe River based on landscape pattern[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(9):1553-1562.
[12]邱国强,牛潜,吴振华,等.苏锡常城市群土地利用冲突空间测度及异质性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):400-406,414.
Qiu G Q, Niu Q, Wu Z H, et al. Spatial evaluate and heterogeneity analysis of land use conflict in su-xi-Chang urban agglomeration[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(4):400-406,414.
[13]阮松涛,吴克宁.城镇化进程中土地利用冲突及其缓解机制研究:基于非合作博弈的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(S2):388-392.
Ruan S T, Wu K N. Research on Land Use Conflict and Its Mitigation Mechanism in the Process of Urbanization:Based on the perspective of non-cooperative game theory[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2013,23(S2):388-392.
[14]Ma D G, Chen J, Zhang W J, et al. Farmers' vulnerability to flood risk[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2007,17(3):269-284.
[15]Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014,24(2):195-210.
[16]谢花林.基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5020-5026.
Xie H L. Regional eco-risk analysis of based on landscape structure and spatial statistics[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(10):5020-5026.
[17]周德,徐建春,王莉.环杭州湾城市群土地利用的空间冲突与复杂性[J].地理研究,2015,34(9):1630-1642.
Zhou D, Xu J C, Wang L. Land use spatial conflicts and complexity:A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(9):1630-1642.
[18]Zuo Q, Zhou Y, Wang L, et al. Impacts of future land use changes on land use conflicts based on multiple scenarios in the central mountain region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,137:108743.
[19]吕思雨,张金燕,毋兆鹏.精河县绿洲土地利用及其空间冲突研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(4):428-436.
Lü S Y, Zhang J Y, Wu Z P. Study on the spatial conflict of land use in Jinghe County oasis[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022,38(4):428-436.
[20]张玲玲,赵永华,殷莎,等.基于移动窗口法的岷江干旱河谷景观格局梯度分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3276-3284.
Zhang L L, Zhao Y H, Yin S, et al. Gradient analysis of dry valley of Minjiang River landscape pattern, based on moving window method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(12):3276-3284.
[21]付扬军,师学义,和娟.汾河流域景观破碎化时空演变特征[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(8):1606-1619.
Fu Y J, Shi X Y, He J. The spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of landscape fragmentation in Fenhe River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(8):1606-1619.
[22]Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation(PLUS)model:A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021,85:101569.
[23]胡丰,张艳,郭宇,等.基于PLUS和InVEST模型的渭河流域土地利用与生境质量时空变化及预测[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(4):1125-1136.
Hu F, Zhang Y, Guo Y, et al. Spatial and temporal changes in land use and habitat quality in the Weihe River Basin based on the PLUS and InVEST models and predictions[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022,45(4):1125-1136.
[24]Lin Z Q, Peng S Y. Comparison of multimodel simulations of land use and land cover change considering integrated constraints:A case study of the Fuxian Lake Basin[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,142:109254.
[25]王保盛,廖江福,祝薇,等.基于历史情景的FLUS模型邻域权重设置:以闽三角城市群2030年土地利用模拟为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4284-4298.
Wang B S, Liao J F, Zhu W, et al. The weight of neighborhood setting of the FLUS model based on a historical scenario:A case study of land use simulation of urban agglomeration of the Golden Triangle of Southern Fujian in 2030[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(12):4284-4298.
[26]Dong G L, Ge Y B, Jia H W, et al. Land use multi-suitability, land resource scarcity and diversity of human needs:A new framework for land use conflict identification[J]. Land, 2021,10(10):1003.
[27]陈理庭,蔡海生,张婷,等.基于Markov-FLUS模型的饶河流域土地利用多情景模拟分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(10):3947-3958.
Chen L T, Cai H S, Zhang T, et al. Land use multi-scenario simulation analysis of Rao River Basin based on Markov-FLUS model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(10):3947-3958.
[28]张潇,谷人旭.土地利用冲突的时空格局刻画与多情景模拟研究:以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].地理研究,2022,41(5):1311-1326.
Zhang X, Gu R X. Spatio-temporal pattern and multi-scenario simulation of land use conflict:A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(5):1311-1326.
[29]喇蕗梦,勾蒙蒙,李乐,等.三峡库区生态系统服务权衡时空动态与情景模拟:以秭归县为例[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(11):1368-1377.
La L M, Gou M M, Li L, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and scenarios analysis on trade-offs between ecosystem service in Three Gorges Reservoir area:A case study of Zigui County[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021,37(11):1368-1377.
[30]吴浩,周璐,史文中,等.基于正交试验设计的土地利用变化元胞自动机模拟过程的尺度敏感性分析[J].地理科学,2013,33(10):1252-1258.
Wu H, Zhou L, Shi W Z, et al. Scale sensitive of cellular automata model for the simulation of land use change based on orthogonal experiment[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(10):1252-1258.
[31]张鹏,李良涛,苏玉姣,等.基于PLUS和InVEST模型的邯郸市碳储量空间分布特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(3):338-348.
Zhang P, Li L T, Su Y J, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of carbon storage in Handan city based on PLUS and InVEST models[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(3):338-348.
[32]Liu X P, Zhang Z, Li M X, et al. Spatial conflict simulation of land-use based on human-land-landscape elements intercoordination:A case study in Tianjin, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022,194(5):317.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-06-30