[1]Zhang Mingdan,Li Yungang.Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-off/Synergy Relationship in Ruili-Daying River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):415-422.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.017]
Copy
Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-off/Synergy Relationship in Ruili-Daying River Basin
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 06
Page number:
415-422
Column:
Public date:
2023-10-10
- Title:
- Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-off/Synergy Relationship in Ruili-Daying River Basin
- CLC:
- X171.1
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.017
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to explore the ecosystem service trade-offs and synergistic relationships in Ruili -Daying River basin, and to provide a theoretical basis for land management and ecosystem service optimization in this region. [Method] The InVEST model was used to quantitatively evaluate the ecosystem service of water yield, soil retention, and carbon storage in Ruili-Daying River Basin based on multi-source data including the land use and land cover, topography, meteorology and soil conditions covering 2000, 2010 and 2020. Moreover, the characteristics of trade-offs and synergies among different ecosystem services were analyzed by using the spatial overlay analysis method. [Results](1)From 2000 to 2020, the areas of forest land, cropland, grassland, wetland and bare land decreased in Ruili-Daying River basin, while the shrubland, construction land and water bodies increased gradually.(2)The mean water supply depth, unit amount of soil retention and carbon storage were 749.60 mm, 365.78 t/hm2, 137.51 t/hm2, respectively. In the past 20 years, the water yield and soil retention increased at first and then decreased, and the change of carbon storage was not obvious.(3)The ecosystem services provided by different land use types differentiated, with construction land, shrubland and forest land providing the highest water yield, soil retention capacity and carbon storage per unit area, respectively.(4)The ecosystem service relationship in Ruili-Daying River Basin was dominated by trade-offs, in which the proportion of severe trade-off areas was as high as 55%, the proportion of weak trade-off areas was about 4%～8%, the proportion of areas with poor synergy was about 24%～30%, and the proportion of areas with good synergy was about 10%～13%. During the study period, the proportion of with poor synergistic areas decreased by 5.78%, while the proportion of weakly trade-off, severely trade-off and well synergistic areas increased by 2.79%, 0.79% and 2.2%, respectively. [Conclusion] The degree of ecosystem service trade-offs in Ruili-Daying River basin was enhanced while the overall level of services was on an upward trend.
- References:
-
[1] Daily G C. Nature'S Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[2] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
Fu B J, Zhang L W. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(4):441-446.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[4] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(11):1250-1259.
Dai E F, Wang X L, Zhu J J, et al. Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2015,30(11):1250-1259.
[5] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
Qian C Y, Gong J, Zhang J X, et al. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(5):868-879.
[6] 王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
Wang P T, Zhang L W, Li Y J, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[7] 汪晓珍,吴建召,吴普侠,等.2000—2015年黄土高原生态系统水源涵养、土壤保持和NPP服务的时空分布与权衡/协同关系[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):114-121,128.
Wang X Z, Wu J Z, Wu P X, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution and trade-off of water conservation, soil conservation and NPP services in the ecosystems of the Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2015[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):114-121,128.
[8] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009,7(1):4-11.
[9] 于媛,韩玲,李明玉,等.哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):293-300.
Yu Y, Han L, Li M Y, et al. Study on the spatial-temporal characteristics of ecosystem services and tradeoffs/synergies in Ha-Chang urban agglomeration[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(2):293-300.
[10] 张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):975-988.
Zhang J J, Zhu W B, Zhu L Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis of trade-off/synergy effects of forest ecosystem services in the Funiu Mountain Region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(5):975-988.
[11] 王晓萌,潘佩佩,王晓旭,等.基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):80-88.
Wang X M, Pan P P, Wang X X, et al. Research on ecosystem service trade off/synergy relationship in Hebei Province based on land use[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021,37(1):80-88.
[12] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.
Peng J, Hu X X, Zhao M Y, et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(6):960-973.
[13] Budyko M I. Climate and Life[M]. New York, USA: Academic Press, 1974.
[14] Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001,37(3):701-708.
[15] 周文佐.基于GIS的我国主要土壤类型土壤有效含水量研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2003.
Zhou W Z. A Study on Available Water Capacity of Main Soil Types in China Based on Geographic Information System[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003.
[16] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56 [R]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998.
[17] Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, et al. InVEST Tip User's Guide[M]. Palo Alto, USA: the Natural Capital Project, 2014.
[18] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning[M]. Washington D C: Agricultural Handbook, 1978.
[19] 章文波,谢云,刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):705-711.
Zhang W B, Xie Y, Liu B Y. Rainfall erosivity estimation using daily rainfall amounts[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002,22(6):705-711.
[20] Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and conservation sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971,26(5):189-193.
[21] 彭建,李丹丹,张玉清.基于GIS和RUSLE的滇西北山区土壤侵蚀空间特征分析:以云南省丽江县为例[J].山地学报,2007,25(5):548-556.
Peng J, Li D D, Zhang Y Q. Analysis of spatial characteristics of soil erosion in mountain areas of northwestern Yunnan Based on GIS and RUSLE[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2007,25(5):548-556.
[22] Duan X W, Rong L, Hu J M, et al. Soil organic carbon stocks in the Yunnan Plateau, southwest China: Spatial variations and environmental controls[J]. Journal of Soil & Sediments, 2014,14(10):1643-1658.
[23] 解宪丽,孙波,周慧珍,等.中国土壤有机碳密度和储量的估算与空间分布分析[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):35-43.
Xie X L, Sun B, Zhou H Z, et al. Organic carbon density and storage in soils of China and spatial analysis[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004,41(1):35-43.
[24] 解宪丽,孙波,周慧珍,等.不同植被下中国土壤有机碳的储量与影响因子[J].土壤学报,2004,41(5):687-699.
Xie X L, Sun B, Zhou H Z, et al. Soil carbon stocks and their influencing factors under native vegetations in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004,41(5):687-699.
[25] 李克让,王绍强,曹明奎.中国植被和土壤碳贮量[J].中国科学:地球科学,2003,33(1):72-80.
Li K R, Wang S Q, CAO M K. Carbon storage of vegetation and soil in China[J], Scientia Sinica(Terrae),2003,33(1):72-80.
[26] 林世伟,武瑞东.“三江并流”区生态系统土壤保持服务的空间分布特征[J].云南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(2):295-302.
Lin S W, Wu R D. The spatial pattern of soil retention ecosystem service in the Three Parallel Rivers Region[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2015,37(2):295-302.
[27] 李理,赵芳,朱连奇,等.淇河流域生态系统服务权衡及空间分异机制的地理探测[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7568-7578.
Li L, Zhao F, Zhu L Q, et al. Geographical detection of ecosystem services trade-offs and their spatial variation mechanism in Qihe River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(19):7568-7578.
[28] 戴尔阜,王亚慧.横断山区产水服务空间异质性及归因分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(3):607-619.
Dai E F, Wang Y H. Spatial heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of water yield service in the Hengduan Mountain region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(3):607-619.
[29] 汤浩藩,许彦红,艾建林.云南省森林植被碳储量和碳密度及其空间分布格局[J].林业资源管理,2019(5):37-43.
Tang H F, Xu Y H, Ai J L. Carbon storage and carbon density of forest vegetation and their spatial distribution pattern in Yunnan Province[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2019(5):37-43.
[30] 贾振宇,王世曦,刘学,等.辽河保护区土壤保持功能时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):686-692.
Jia Z Y, Wang S X, Liu X, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of soil conservation function and its influencing factors in Liaohe Conservation Area[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021,11(4):686-692.
[31] 王蓓,赵军,胡秀芳.石羊河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7582-7595.
Wang B, Zhao J, Hu X F. Analysis on trade-offs and synergistic relationships among multiple ecosystem services in the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(21):7582-7595.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-10-10