PDF Download

[1]SONG Guandong,TANG Chengli,ZHOU Guohua.Analysis on Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Rural Human Settlements Quality in Hunan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):427-434,452.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.035.]

Copy

Analysis on Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Rural Human Settlements Quality in Hunan Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 05 Page number: 427-434,452 Column: Public date: 2023-08-10

Title:: Analysis on Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Rural Human Settlements Quality in Hunan Province

Author(s):: SONG Guandong¹, TANG Chengli¹, ZHOU Guohua^1,2; (1.School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China; 2.Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Keywords:: rural human settlements environment; temporal and spatial pattern; influencing factors; TOPSIS method; Hunan Province

CLC:: X821

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.035.

Abstract:: [Objective] The aims of this study are to scientifically evaluate the quality of rural human settlements in Hunan Province, to explore its influencing factors, and then to provide a scientific basis for rural human settlements governance and construction. [Methods] The evaluation index system of rural human settlements quality consisting of three subsystems: production environment, living environment, and the ecological environment was constructed, and the TOPSIS model and spatial autocorrelation analysis were used to explore the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of rural human settlements in Hunan Province from 2013 to 2020, and a spatial regression model was constructed to reveal its influencing factors. [Results] During the study period, the overall quality of the rural human settlement environment and the quality of each subsystem in Hunan Province improved, and the spatial pattern showed a positive spatial correlation. The counties with ‘high-high' correlation mainly distributed in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration area, while the counties with ‘low-low' correlation were mostly located in the south and west of Hunan. This feature also applied to the spatial distribution of production environment quality and living environment quality in Hunan Province. The qualities of the rural human settlements were affected by a combination of factors such as the state of economic and social development, natural conditions, resource endowment, and infrastructure level. Among them, the economic and social development status had the greatest impact on rural human settlements, showing a significant positive promoting effect, while natural conditions exhibited a negative inhibiting effect. [Conclusion] Resources should be allocated according to local conditions in the construction of rural human settlements in Hunan Province, to coordinate the coordinated development of production, living, and ecological environment, to continuously reduce regional differences, and to promote the continuous improvement of the quality of rural human settlements around the country.

References:: [1] 唐任伍,唐堂,李楚翘.中国共产党成立100年来乡村发展的演进进程、理论逻辑与实践价值[J].改革,2021(6):27-37.
[2] 王成,李颢颖,何焱洲,等.重庆直辖以来乡村人居环境可持续发展力及其时空分异研究[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(4):556-566.
[3] Shan B, Liu J, Liu Y, et al. How Is Construction Land Transition Related to Rural Transformation? Evidence from a Plain County in China Based on the Grey Correlation Model[J]. Land, 2022, 11(5): 641.
[4] Dou H J, Ma L B, Li H, et al. Impact evaluation and driving type identification of human factors on rural human settlement environment:Taking Gansu Province, China as an example [J]. Open Geosciences, 2020,12(1):1324-1337.
[5] 龙花楼,陈坤秋.基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J].地理学报,2021,76(2):295-309.
[6] 邹存铭,房艳刚,袁庆学.半干旱贫困地区乡村聚落空间演变与易地扶贫搬迁重构效应:以吉林省通榆县为例[J].经济地理,2022,42(4):27-33.
[7] 刘彦随,周扬,李玉恒.中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J].地理学报,2019,74(12):2511-2528.
[8] 李雪铭,田深圳.中国人居环境的地理尺度研究[J].地理科学,2015,35(12):1495-1501.
[9] 杨兴柱,王群.皖南旅游区乡村人居环境质量评价及影响分析[J].地理学报,2013,68(6):851-867.
[10] 戴柳燕,周国华,何兰.乡村吸引力的概念及其形成机制[J].经济地理,2019,39(8):177-184.
[11] 冯越峰,赵少俐.山东省乡村人居环境可持续发展水平评价及提升策略研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(8):155-162.
[12] 张斐男.日常生活视角下的农村环境治理:以农村人居环境改造为例[J].江海学刊,2021(4):125-131.
[13] 曾菊新,杨晴青,刘亚晶,等.国家重点生态功能区乡村人居环境演变及影响机制:以湖北省利川市为例[J].人文地理,2016,31(1):81-88.
[14] 李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣.乡村人居环境系统的自组织演化机理研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(9):130-136.
[15] 朱媛媛,周笑琦,罗静,等.长江中游城市群乡村人居环境质量评价及其时空分异[J].经济地理,2021,41(4):127-136.
[16] 朱彬,张小林,尹旭.江苏省乡村人居环境质量评价及空间格局分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):138-144.
[17] Zhao X, Sun H B, Chen B, et al. China's rural human settlements: Qualitative evaluation, quantitative analysis and policy implications[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,105:398-405.
[18] 梁晨,李建平,李俊杰.基于“三生”功能的我国农村人居环境质量与经济发展协调度评价与优化[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(10):19-30.
[19] 李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣.转型期欠发达地区乡村人居环境演变特征及微观机制:以湖北省红安县二程镇为例[J].人文地理,2012,27(6):56-61.
[20] 曹萍,盛业旭,任建兰.中国乡村人居环境脆弱性演化及影响因素[J].地域研究与开发,2021,40(5):7-12.
[21] 唐宁,王成.重庆县域乡村人居环境综合评价及其空间分异[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):315-321.
[22] 蒲金芳,王亚楠,刘沙沙,等.河北省县域乡村人居环境质量评价及其影响因素研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(12):248-259.
[23] 李裕瑞,张轩畅,陈秧分,等.人居环境质量对乡村发展的影响:基于江苏省村庄抽样调查截面数据的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(8):158-167.
[24] 陈文胜.湖南乡村振兴报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2021.5-11.
[25] 彭焕智,周国华,崔树强,等.湘江流域土地利用多功能性评价及障碍因子识别[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):308-315.
[26] 金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[27] 宾津佑,唐小兵,陈士银.广东省县域乡村人居环境质量评价及其影响因素[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):203-209,223.
[28] 吴良镛.人居环境科学导论[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.12-15.
[29] 王检萍,余敦,孙聪康,等.国土空间规划背景下村域“三生”空间划定与实证研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(11):265-275.
[30] 许亿欣,王晓霞,周景博,等.农村人居环境治理满意度及影响因素分析:基于2019年的典型调查[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(5):17-24.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-08-10