PDF Download

[1]ZHAO Jiangtao,ZHAO Guangju,MU Xingmin,et al.Runoff and Sediment Load Variation and Driving Factors in the Hantaichuan Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):169-174.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.030.]

Copy

Runoff and Sediment Load Variation and Driving Factors in the Hantaichuan Basin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 05 Page number: 169-174 Column: Public date: 2023-08-10

Title:: Runoff and Sediment Load Variation and Driving Factors in the Hantaichuan Basin

Author(s):: ZHAO Jiangtao¹, ZHAO Guangju^1,2, MU Xingmin^1,2, CHEN Zhaoliang¹, WANG Ruidong³, ZHANG Qiaolan³; (1.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 3.Erdos Hydrological Survey Bureau of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Erdos, Inner Mongolia 017200, China)

Keywords:: Hantaichuan Basin; runoff; sediment load; water-sediment relationship; attribution analysis

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.030.

Abstract:: [Objective] The aims are to study the characteristics of precipitation, runoff and sediment transport in typical tributaries of Kongdui, quantify the impact of climate change and human activities on water and sediment changes, so as to reveal the driving mechanism of water and sediment evolution in Kongdui area, and to explore the reasons for the reduction of sediment transferring to Yellow River through Kongdui. [Methods] Based on annual precipitation, runoff and sediment discharge data from 1980 to 2018 in the Hantaichuan Basin, a typical tributary of the 10 Kongdui in the Yellow River Basin, the causes of water and sediment changes were investigated by means of linear trend method, Mann-Kendall trend test, Pettitt catastrophe test and double accumulation curve. [Results] Precipitation and runoff in Hantaichuan watershed showed a non-significant upward trend, while sediment discharge showed a significant downward trend(p<0.05). The annual runoff and annual sediment discharge both changed abruptly in 1998. After the abrupt change, the annual average runoff decreased by 38.61% compared with that before the abrupt change, while the sediment discharge significantly decreased by 80.61% compared with that before the abrupt change. [Conclusion] Human activities are the main factors contributing to the decrease of runoff and sediment discharge in the Hantaichuan Basin, with the contribution rates of 60.38% and 59.73%, respectively, while the contribution rates of precipitation change are 39.62% and 40.27%, respectively.

References:: [1] 穆兴民,赵广举,高鹏,等.黄河未来输沙量态势及其适用性对策[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):328-332.
[2] 王慧.黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑生态脆弱性演变及驱动力分析[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020.
[3] 阳辉,师长兴.黄河上游十大孔兑冲积扇泥沙运动和沉积环境研究[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(4):33-38.
[4] 王平,田勇,侯素珍,等.黄河内蒙古段孔兑水沙特点分析[J].人民黄河,2012,34(11):39-42.
[5] 王云毅.罕台川流域上游水土保持措施减水减沙效益研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015.
[6] 白雪莲,王理想,季树新,等.鄂尔多斯草原沙漠交错区生态系统健康评价:以十大孔兑为例[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):187-194.
[7] 冯家豪,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河中游区间干支流径流变化特征与归因分析[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(8):90-103.
[8] 田小靖,赵广举,穆兴民,等.水文序列突变点识别方法比较研究[J].泥沙研究,2019,44(2):33-40.
[9] 赵广举,穆兴民,温仲明,等.皇甫川流域降水和人类活动对水沙变化的定量分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(4):1-8.
[10] 穆兴民,王万忠,高鹏,等.黄河泥沙变化研究现状与问题[J].人民黄河,2014,36(12):1-7.
[11] Kendall M G. Rank correlation methods[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1990,25(1):86-91.
[12] Mann H B. Nonparametric test against trend[J]. Econometrica, 1945,13(3):245-259.
[13] Pettitt A N. A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series C(Applied Statistics),1979,28(2):126-135.
[14] 穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.
[15] 姚海芳,师长兴,顾畛逵.气候变化和人类活动对黄河上游十大孔兑水沙过程的影响[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(3):472-479.
[16] 白雪莲.十大孔兑复合地貌区水土侵蚀时空异质性[D]. 山东烟台:鲁东大学,2020.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-08-10