[1]TANG Zhixiong,ZHOU Zixiang,BAI Jizhou,et al.Scale Seterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs/Synergies in the Jinghe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):318-326.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.043.]
Copy
Scale Seterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs/Synergies in the Jinghe River Basin
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 04
Page number:
318-326
Column:
Public date:
2023-06-10
- Title:
- Scale Seterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs/Synergies in the Jinghe River Basin
- Keywords:
- ecosystem services; trade-offs and synergy; SWAT model; CASA model; InVEST model; Jinghe River Basin
- CLC:
- X171
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.043.
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The scale heterogeneity of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies in Jinghe River Basin was investigated, and the main reasons for the change of trade-offs/synergies at sub-basin scale were elucidated, which could provide scientific reference for ecological protection and high-quality development in the Loess Plateau. [Methods] Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT), Carnegie Ames-Stanford Approach(CASA)model, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs(InVEST)model were used to quantify five kinds of ecosystem services(food supply, soil conservation, water yield, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality), and spatial correlation statistical method was used to study the scale heterogeneity of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies at the whole basin and sub-basin scales. [Results](1)The food supply service in the Jinghe River Basin was stronger in the southeastern part of the basin. The soil conservation service was weaker in the northern and central parts of the basin, but stronger in the southwestern and southeastern parts of the basin. The water yield service was stronger in the western, southern and southeastern part of the basin, weaker in the north, northeast and eastern regions. The carbon sequestration service of the basin was stronger in the southern part than in the northern part, and in the eastern part than in the western part. The habitat quality was dominated by the median and high-value areas, and the high-value areas mainly distributed in the eastern part of the basin, southeast and west, low-value areas mainly distributed in construction land.(2)From the perspective of the whole basin scale, grain yield and soil conservation, water yield, NPP and habitat quality were mainly in trade-off relationship. Soil conservation and water yield, NPP and habitat quality were mainly in synergistic relationship. Water yield and NPP were mainly in synergistic relationship, and the trade-off relationship was the main one with the habitat quality. The NPP and the habitat quality were mainly based on the synergistic relationship.(3)The tradeoffs/synergies between ecosystem services in the Jinghe River Basin changed in some sub-basin, and land use change was the important reason for the changes in the tradeoffs/synergies. [Conclusion] Land use change is the main reason for the scale difference of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies in the Jinghe River Basin. The research on ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies at multiple scales should be strengthened in the future.
- References:
-
[1] King R. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studies, 1966,3(1):41-47.
[2] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C, Island Press, 1997.
[3] Toth F L. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment[C]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2003.
[4] Rodriguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11:28-41.
[5] Martine M, Matthew G E M, Rebecca K R, et al. Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2017,32:240-248.
[6] Arico S, Bridgewater P, Elbeltagy A, et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. World Health Organization, 2005.
[7] Pontius J, Schaberg P, Hanavan R. Remote Sensing for Early, Detailed, and Accurate Detection of Forest Disturbance and Decline for Protection of Biodiversity[M]. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.
[8] Ran H, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. Predicting the spatiotemporal characteristics of flash droughts with downscaled CMIP5 models in the Jinghe River basin of China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020,32:40370-40382.
[9] 杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.黄河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系时空异质性[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(6):78-87.
[10] 白羽萍,王佳斌,刘恋,等.黑河流域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡分析:以张掖市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):1-13.
[11] 李晶,李红艳,张良.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):3053-3062.
[12] Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bocher P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark:trade-offs and synergies in a culturallandscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014,125:89-104.
[13] Bai Y, Wong C P, Jiang B, et al. Developing China's Ecological Redline policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning[J]. Nature Communications, 2018,9:3034.
[14] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecologyand the Environment, 2019,7:4-11.
[15] 杨晓楠,李晶,秦克玉,等.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系[J].地理学报,2015,70(11):1762-1773.
[16] Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(3):22-45.
[17] Zheng T, Zhou Z, Zou Y, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics and spatial flow process of soil conservation service in Jinghe Basin of China[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(4):1-17.
[18] 姚婧,何兴元,陈玮.生态系统服务流研究方法最新进展[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(1):335-342.
[19] 王嘉丽,周伟奇.生态系统服务流研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4213-4222.
[20] Hou Y, Lü Y H, Chen W P, et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions: A case study on the central Loess Plateau of China[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017,32:1201-1217.
[21] 余玉洋,李晶,周自翔,等.基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5465-5477.
[22] Bai J, Zhou Z, Zou Y, et al. Watershed drought and ecosystem services: Spatiotemporal characteristics and gray relational analysis[J]. International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021,10(2):43-64.
[23] Tang C, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. How to optimize ecosystem services based on a Bayesian Model: A case study of Jinghe River Basin[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(15):1-18.
[24] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part Ⅰ: Model development[J]. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998,34(1):73-89.
[25] 朱青,周自翔,刘婷,等.黄土高原植被恢复与生态系统土壤保持服务价值增益研究:以延河流域为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2557-2570.
[26] 刘婷,周自翔,朱青,等.延河流域生态系统土壤保持服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):93-100.
[27] Yu Y, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. Response of multiple mountain ecosystem services on environmental gradients: How to respond, and where should be priority conservation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,278:123264.
[28] Ren Z, Feng Z, Li P, et al. Response of runoff and sediment yield from climate change in the Yanhe Watershed, China[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2017,80(1):30-35.
[29] 余玉洋,李晶,曾莉.中国南北过渡带生态系统固碳服务及价值量空间格局[J].陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2020,48(1):11-20.
[30] Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G, et al. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling:The challenge of identifying input and structural errors[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010,46(5):1-22.
[31] Cla B, Wei S A,Man L C. Evolution of ecosystem service value in rural regions based on geographical scope of entities: A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2021,64:101368.
[32] 孙彦旭,周自翔,米朝娟.基于土地利用覆被变化(LUCC)的人类活动与流域生物多样性灰色关联分析[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1782-1792.
[33] 张文静,孙小银,周俊.南四湖流域关键生态系统服务的时空权衡关系[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8003-8015.
[34] Abbaspour K C, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, et al. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,524:733-752.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-06-10