PDF Download

[1]LI Kai,Houying,Fuqi,et al.Synergistic Changes of Production-Living-Ecology Spaces and Their Influences on Ecosystem Services in the Metropolitan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):430-439.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.043]

Copy

Synergistic Changes of Production-Living-Ecology Spaces and Their Influences on Ecosystem Services in the Metropolitan Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 03 Page number: 430-439 Column: Public date: 2023-04-10

Title:: Synergistic Changes of Production-Living-Ecology Spaces and Their Influences on Ecosystem Services in the Metropolitan Area

Author(s):: LI Kai^1,2,3, Houying^1,4, Fuqi^5,6, Xinru Hong⁷, QIU Mingkun⁸, Huang Youyou^9,10, LIU Baoyin¹¹; (1.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 2.Department of Geosciences and Natural Resources Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1165, Denmark; 3. Sichuan Agricultural University, Department of Landscape Architecture, Chengdu 610000; 4.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 5.School of Politics and Public Administration, Suzhou......)

Keywords:: metropolitan area; production-living-ecology spaces; ecosystem service values; territory space management

CLC:: X826

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.043

Abstract:: [Objective]Research of spatiotemporal changes of the production-living-ecology spaces(PLES)can reveal the human-land relationship and its changing rules, and can further provide theoretical evidence for regional territorial space control. [Methods] Using a typical metropolitan area(the Jinan Metropolitan Area)as the case study area, we investigated the spatiotemporal changes of the PLES from 2000 to 2018 and identified the types and characteristics of the synergetic PLES changes, and then we further evaluated ecosystem service values and their changes of the Jinan Metropolitan Area. Finally, we revealed the influences of the PLES changes on regional ecosystem services. [Results] In terms of the overall PLES change characteristics, the living-production space was the only type with an increase in the area. Among different PLES types, the living-production space had the rapidest changing speed reflected by the dynamic degree of 2.4%. The production-ecology space with the area of 400 245.31 hm² transferred into the living-production space, acting as the main source of the living-production space expansion. The synergistic PLES changes were further divided into five types with significant characteristics and no spatial overlaps, including the ecological-living synergistic change type, the production-living synergistic change type, the ecological change dominance type, production-living-ecological stability type, and living change dominance type. Among different synergistic PLES change types, the districts/counties with the living change dominance type exhibited the most significant decrease in ecosystem service values 〔-3 015.89 yuan/(hm²?a)〕. Among different transfer types of the PLES, the transfer from the production-ecology space to the living-production space had the most negative impacts on ecosystem service values. In this study, we proposed the classification methodology of PLES synergetic changes. [Conclusion] Our study revealed the characteristics of PLES changes and the influences of PLES changes on ecosystem service values in the Jinan Metropolitan Area, which can supplement theoretical research on the PLES. The results of this study can support land use control and zoning management in territorial spaces planning.

References:: [1] 彭建,吕丹娜,董建权,等.过程耦合与空间集成:国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(1):3-13.
[2] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[3] 刘耀林,张扬,张琰,等.特大城市“三线冲突”空间格局及影响因素[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(12):1672-1681.
[4] 扈万泰,王力国,舒沐晖.城乡规划编制中的“三生空间”划定思考[J].城市规划,2016,40(5):21-26.
[5] 黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.
[6] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.
[7] 杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应:以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.
[8] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[9] 崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[10] Pérez S M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions: A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2008:375-404.
[11] 曹根榕,顾朝林,张乔扬.基于POI数据的中心城区“三生空间”识别及格局分析:以上海市中心城区为例[J].城市规划学刊,2019(2):44-53.
[12] Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bøcher P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark:Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014,125:89-104.
[13] Liu Y, Fu B, Zhao W, et al. A solution to the conflicts of multiple planning boundaries:Landscape functional zoning in a resource-based city in China[J]. Habitat International, 2018,77:43-55.
[14] Hou Y, Li B, Muller F, et al. Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences:a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China[J]. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 2016,188:652-671.
[15] 戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.
[16] Wickham J D, Riitters K H, Wade T G, et al. A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010,94:186-195.
[17] Vinogradovs I, Nikodemus O, Elferts D, et al. Assessment of site-specific drivers of farmland abandonment in mosaic-type landscapes:A case study in Vidzeme, Latvia[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018,253:113-121.
[18] Uhl J H, Leyk S. Towards a novel backdating strategy for creating built-up land time series data using contemporary spatial constraints[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020,238:111-127.
[19] 张蕾,刘格格,魏俊青,等.“三生用地”转型的生态系统服务价值效应:以营口市为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(3):838-846.
[20] Duan Y, Wang H, Huang A, et al. Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural“production-living-ecological”space from the perspective of villagers'behavior:A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,106(10):45-57.
[21] Fang C, Yu D. Urban agglomeration:An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017162:126-136.
[22] 白如山,刘恺恺.合肥都市圈“三生空间”演化格局及生态效应测度[J].中国名城,2019(3):16-23.
[23] Madrigal M S, Miralles J L. Land-change dynamics and ecosystem service trends across the central high-Andean Puna[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019,9:88-96.
[24]包妲,李杰,刘锋,等.1995—2015年缅甸土地利用/土地覆盖变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(17):1-10.
[25] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De G R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[26] 欧阳晓,贺清云,朱翔.多情景下模拟城市群土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以长株潭城市群为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(1):93-102.
[27] 刘桂林,张落成,张倩.长三角地区土地利用时空变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3311-3319.
[28] Yang Y, Bao W, Li Y, et al. Land use transition and its eco-environmental effects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration:A production-living-ecological perspective[J]. Land, 2020,285(9):1-24.
[29] 卢庆强,王强,袁昕,等.中国都市圈发展报告2018[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2019:80-101.
[30] 李福柱,付洪凯.山东17地市城市土地利用效率研究—基于DEA模型、超效率模型和Malmquist指数的分析[J].西华大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2016,35(4):55-61.
[31] 游其军,赵玉祥.济南都市圈生态地质环境质量评价[J].山东国土资源,2009,25(10):41-44.
[32] 胡建全,张金良.山东省森林资源变化特点分析[J].山东林业科技,2018,48(3):19-24.
[33] De Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,75:175-186.
[34] 李广东,方创琳.城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[35] 吴琳娜,杨胜天,刘晓燕,等.1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):54-63.
[36] 罗娅,杨胜天,刘晓燕,等.黄河河口镇—潼关区间1998—2010年土地利用变化特征[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):42-53.
[37] 刘金雅,汪东川,孙然好,等.基于变化轨迹分析方法的生态用地流失空间关联研究[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):103-114.
[38] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[39] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[40] Zhao Q, Xu M, Fränti P. Knee point detection on bayesian information criterion[C]. Proceedings of the 2008 20th Ieee International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, New York, 2008:101-115.
[41] Liang, C, Jiang P H, et al. Farmland protection policies and rapid urbanization in China:A case study for Changzhou City[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,48:552-566.
[42] 刘金勇,孔繁花,尹海伟,等.济南市土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1231-1236.
[43] 魏慧,赵文武,张骁,等.基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价:以山东省德州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3830-3839.
[44] 秦晓川,付碧宏.青岛都市圈生态系统服务—经济发展时空协调性分析及优化利用[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8251-8264.
[45] 陈万旭,李江风,朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337..
[46] 耿甜伟,陈海,张行,等.基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(7):1714-1727.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-04-10