PDF Download

[1]SUN Jinxin,HAN Mei,KONG Xianglun,et al.Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of Nature Protected Areas in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):395-402,412.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.051]

Copy

Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of Nature Protected Areas in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 03 Page number: 395-402,412 Column: Public date: 2023-04-10

Title:: Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of Nature Protected Areas in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River

Author(s):: SUN Jinxin, HAN Mei, KONG Xianglun, WEI Fan, WANG Jiawei; (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

Keywords:: nature protected areas; lower reaches of the Yellow River; spatio-temporal characteristics; kernel density; high-quality development

CLC:: TU982

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.051

Abstract:: [Objective]The construction of nature protected areas(NPAs)is an important means to promote the construction of ecological civilization and the high-quality development of ecological environment. The study of the spatio-temporal characteristics of NPAs can deepen the understanding of its historical process, resource endowment and function positioning, and has an important guiding significance for the high-quality development of NPAs. [Methods]The global Moran index, standard deviation ellipse and kernel density estimation were used to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the nature reserves established in the lower reaches of the Yellow River between 1980 and 2020. [Results] In terms of spatial distribution, NPAs spread in a northeast-southwest direction, and their distribution center of gravity had generally shifted 88.199 km to the southwest over the past 40 years. The overall aggregation of NPAs had been increasing, with the most aggregation in the mountainous hills of south central Shandong Province and the low mountainous hills of east Shandong Province, forming two high-density areas similar to the division sign ‘÷' and ‘bimodal', respectively. In terms of development history, the study area had experienced three stages: initial exploration, steady development, and standardized development, and gradually shifted from focusing on quantitative growth to quality improvement. In terms of influencing factors, topography and geomorphology, water and heat conditions, species diversity, and vegetation cover were important factors affecting the spatial distribution and resource endowment of NPAs. Policy orientation and the improvement of ecological protection awareness were important factors leading to the increase in the quantity and quality of NPAs. [Conclusions] In order to promote the high-quality development of NPAs, ecological cities in the lower reaches of the Yellow River region should be planned based on the distribution pattern of NPAs, special ecological tourism should be developed, and ecological resources should be integrated from the point to the surface in the whole region. The results of the study can provide reliable suggestions for the high-quality development of NPAs in the lower reaches of the Yellow River.

References:: [1] 刘超.“自然保护地”法律概念之析义与梳正[J].暨南学报:哲学社会科学版,2020,42(10):24-39.
[2] 陈战是,于涵,孙铁,等.生态文明视野下自然保护地规划的研究与思考[J].中国园林,2020,36(11):14-18.
[3] 郭子良,祝伟,雷茵茹,等.自然保护地管理有效性评估方法综述[J].世界林业研究,2020,33(3):13-19.
[4] 肖练练,钟林生,周睿,等.近30年来国外国家公园研究进展与启示[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(2):244-255.
[5] 李博炎,朱彦鹏,刘伟玮,等.中国国家公园体制试点进展、问题及对策建议[J].生物多样性,2021,29(3):283-289.
[6] 胡德胜,许胜晴,归帆.黄河流域自然保护地管理体制机制的立法规制[J].中国软科学,2021(11):1-9.
[7] 秦天宝,刘彤彤.自然保护地立法的体系化:问题识别、逻辑建构和实现路径[J].法学论坛,2020,35(2):131-140.
[8] 刘某承,王佳然,刘伟玮,等.国家公园生态保护补偿的政策框架及其关键技术[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1330-1337.
[9] 程立峰,张惠远.实现自然保护地共建共享的路径建议[J].环境保护,2019,47(19):8-10.
[10] 张语克,张琼悦,张跃,等.自然保护地环境解说资源研究:以九寨沟芦苇海解说步道为例[J].生物多样性,2022,30(2):73-90.
[11] 梦梦,刘鑫,赵英男,等.自然保护地环境教育实践与研究现状[J].世界林业研究,2020,33(2):31-36.
[12] 翁爱芳,范少贞,卢远清,等.基于成本效益评估的县域自然保护地优化整合方案比较研究:以福建省泰宁县为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(8):2020-2037.
[13] 朱里莹,徐姗,兰思仁.中国国家级保护地空间分布特征及对国家公园布局建设的启示[J].地理研究,2017,36(2):307-320.
[14] 罗红,陈磊,姜运力,等.自然保护地整合优化的景观格局变化分析:以贵州省思南县为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8076-8086.
[15] 高吉喜,刘晓曼,周大庆,等.中国自然保护地整合优化关键问题[J].生物多样性,2021,29(3):290-294.
[16] 樊涵,杨朝辉,王丞,等.贵州省自然保护地时空演变特征及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(3):1005-1014.
[17] 周婷,牛安逸,马姣娇,等.国家湿地公园时空格局特征[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(1):26-39.
[18] Xu B C, Pan J H. Spatial distribution characteristics of national protected areas in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(12):2047-2068.
[19] 潘竟虎,徐柏翠.中国国家级自然保护地的空间分布特征与可达性[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(2):353-362.
[20] 马坤,唐晓岚.长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2022,46(3):12-20.
[21] 梅林,姜洪强.基于Airbnb数据的北京市民宿空间分异过程、因素与趋势[J].经济地理,2021,41(3):213-222.
[22] 黄葵.重庆市乡村旅游资源空间特征及其与乡村振兴关系研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):216-224.
[23] 麻学锋,刘玉林.旅游产业成长与城市空间形态演变的关系:以张家界为例[J].经济地理,2019,39(5):226-234.
[24] 刘敏,郝炜,张芙蓉.山西省A级景区空间分布与影响因素[J].经济地理,2020,40(8):231-240.
[25] 陈刚,吴清,杨俭波,等.中国国家森林乡村的空间分布特征与影响因素[J].经济地理,2021,41(6):196-204.
[26] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[27] 樊涵,王晓娟,杨朝辉,等.遵义市4种主要自然保护地空间分布特征及其影响因素研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(3):334-341.
[28] 杨利,石彩霞,谢炳庚.长江流域国家湿地公园时空演变特征及其驱动因素[J].经济地理,2019,39(11):194-202.
[29] 王兆峰,史伟杰.中国美丽休闲乡村的空间分布特征及影响因素[J].地理科学,2022,42(1):104-114.
[30] 刘敏,郝炜.山西省国家A级旅游景区空间分布影响因素研究[J].地理学报,2020,75(4):878-888.
[31] 何思源,王博杰,王国萍,等.自然保护地社区生计转型与产业发展[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9207-9215.
[32] 吴必虎,谢冶凤,张玉钧.自然保护地游憩和旅游:生态系统服务、法定义务与社会责任[J].旅游科学,2021,35(5):1-10.
[33] 赵力,张炜,刘楠,等.国家公园理念下区域生态旅游资源评价:以青海湖与祁连山毗邻区域为例[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(6):1796-1809.
[34] 欧阳志云,杜傲,徐卫华.中国自然保护地体系分类研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7207-7215.
[35] 李群绩,王灵恩.中国自然保护地旅游资源利用的冲突和协调路径分析[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(12):2105-2117.
[36] 余付勤,张百平,王晶,等.国外大尺度生态廊道保护进展与秦岭国家公园建设[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(10):2478-2490.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-04-10