PDF Download

[1]ZHU Junjun,GAO Zhoubing,WANG Junxiao,et al.Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-off/Synergy Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Nanjing Metropolitan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):383-394.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.037]

Copy

Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-off/Synergy Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Nanjing Metropolitan Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 03 Page number: 383-394 Column: Public date: 2023-04-10

Title:: Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-off/Synergy Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Nanjing Metropolitan Area

Author(s):: ZHU Junjun^1,2, GAO Zhoubing^1,2, WANG Junxiao^1,2, LIAO Kaihua³, LYU Ligang^1,2; (1.School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanjing 210017, China; 3.Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

Keywords:: ecosystem services; InVEST model; trade-off/synergy relationship; spatiotemporal changes; Nanjing Metropolitan Area

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.037

Abstract:: [Objective]A comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem services and their interrelationships can enrich theories related to ecosystem services and sustainable development, and provide important guidance for the formulation of regional ecological and environmental management policies. [Methods] Taking the Nanjing metropolitan area as the study area, we analyzed the differences of the capacity of each type of ecosystem service in land use types and regions based on the assessment of four types of ecosystem services from 2000 to 2020, including water production, food supply, soil conservation and carbon sequestration, assessed the capacity of service provisioning in different regions by identifying ecosystem service hotspots and their service types, and explored the static and dynamic trade-offs/synergies between ecosystem services in Nanjing Metropolitan Area by using correlation analysis. [Results] In the years 2000, 2010 and 2020, the three-year average amounts of water production, food production, soil conservation and carbon sequestration in the Nanjing Metropolitan Area were 522.12 mm, 4.20 t/hm², 42.61 t/hm² and 44.57 t/hm², respectively, with all services increasing year by year except for carbon sequestration. The spatial distributions of water production, soil conservation and carbon sequestration services were relatively high in the south and low in the north, while that of food supply service was low in the south and high in the north, depending on the type of land use and the natural environment of the region. From north to south, a 1-fold service hotspot with food supply services, a 2-fold service hotspot with water production and food supply services, and a 3-fold service hotspot with water production, soil conservation and carbon sequestration services were formed in turn. The trade-off/synergy results obtained by using the static and dynamic approaches were different. [Conclusion] In the work of territorial spatial planning and ecological restoration of the Nanjing Metropolitan Area, the spatiotemporal changes of different ecosystem services and their relationships should be considered to reduce the trade-off between different services and maximize ecological benefits.

References:: [1] Costanza R, D'Arge R, Groot R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1997,25(1):3-15.
[2] 林媚珍,刘汉仪,周汝波,等.多情景模拟下粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J].地理研究,2021,40(9):2657-2669.
[3] 陈心盟,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究,2021,40(1):18-34.
[4] 金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[5] Braun D, Jong R, Schaepman M E, et al. Ecosystem service change caused by climatological and non-climatological drivers:a Swiss case study[J]. Ecological Applications, 2019,29(4):e01901.
[6] 姜晗,吴群.基于LUCC的江苏省生态系统服务价值评估及时空演变特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(11):2712-2725.
[7] 陈万旭,李江风,朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337.
[8] 王世豪,黄麟,徐新良,等.粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务时空演化及其权衡与协同特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):8403-8416.
[9] 尹礼唱,王晓峰,张琨,等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2162-2172.
[10] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡—协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[11] 王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[12] 余玉洋,李晶,周自翔,等.基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5465-5477.
[13] 郝梦雅,任志远,孙艺杰,等.关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):592-602.
[14] Rodríguez J P, Beard T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1):art28,DOI:10,5751/ES-01667-110128.
[15] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[16] Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions:an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(3),DOI:10,5751/ES-04853-170322.
[17] Lester S E, Costello C, Halpern B S, et al. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning[J]. Marine Policy, 2013,38:80-89.
[18] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.
[19] Pan J, Wei S, Li Z. Spatiotemporal pattern of trade-offs and synergistic relationships among multiple ecosystem services in an arid inland river basin in NW China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,114:106345
[20] Geng W, Li Y, Zhang P, et al. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,138:108825
[21] Bradford J B, D'Amato A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012,10(4):210-216.
[22] Niu T, Yu J, Yue D, et al. The temporal and spatial evolution of ecosystem service synergy/trade-offs based on ecological units[J]. Forests, 2021,12(8), DOI:10,3390/f12080992.
[23] 刘海,武靖,陈晓玲.丹江口水源区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同关系[J].生态学报,2018,38(13):4609-4624.
[24] Vallet A, Locatelli B, Levrel H, et al. Relationships between ecosystem services:comparing methods for assessing tradeoffs and synergies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018,150:96-106.
[25] 冯漪,曹银贵,李胜鹏,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究:发展历程与研究特征[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(1):11-25.
[26] 黄麟,祝萍,曹巍.中国退耕还林还草对生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(3):1178-1188.
[27] Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, et al. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt[J]. Science, 2008,319(5867):1235-1238.
[28] 张琨,吕一河,傅伯杰.生态恢复中生态系统服务的演变:趋势、过程与评估[J].生态学报,2016,36(20):6337-6344.
[29] Yang M, Gao X, Zhao X, et al. Scale effect and spatially explicit drivers of interactions between ecosystem services: A case study from the Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,785:147389
[30] Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, et al. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas:Thresholds identification[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,607:706-714.
[31] Qiu M, Van de Voorde T, Li T, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of agroecosystem service trade-offs and its driving factors across different climate zones[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,130:108154.
[32] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
[33] 黄颖,税伟,温铁军,等.安庆都市圈生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(3):217-228.
[34] Wu S, Li S. Ecosystem service relationships:Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,99:1-11.
[35] Gou M, Li L, Ouyang S, et al. Identifying and analyzing ecosystem service bundles and their socioecological drivers in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,307:127208.
[36] 方露露,许德华,王伦澈,等.长江、黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研究[J].地理研究,2021,40(3):821-838.
[37] Zhang H, Pang Q, Hua Y, et al. Linking ecological red lines and public perceptions of ecosystem services to manage the ecological environment:A case study in the Fenghe River watershed of Xi'an[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,113:106218.
[38] 刘业轩,石晓丽,史文娇.福建省森林生态系统水源涵养服务评估:InVEST模型与meta分析对比[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1349-1361.
[39] 赵文亮,贺振,贺俊平,等.基于MODIS-NDVI的河南省冬小麦产量遥感估测[J].地理研究,2012,31(12):2310-2320.
[40] 李军玲,郭其乐,彭记永.基于MODIS数据的河南省冬小麦产量遥感估算模型[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(10):1665-1669.
[41] 戴路炜,唐海萍,张钦,等.北方农牧交错带多伦县生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2863-2876.
[42] 占湉,于洋,吴秀芹.湟水流域生态系统服务供需匹配关系[J].生态学报,2021,41(18):7260-7272.
[43] 刘立程,刘春芳,王川,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务供需匹配研究:以兰州市为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1921-1937.
[44] 胡胜,曹明明,刘琪,等.不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2393-2406.
[45] 刘洋,张军,周冬梅,等.基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):4052-4065.
[46] Ouyang X, Tang L, Wei X, et al. Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021,109(4):105587. DOI:10,1016/j. landusepol, 2021.105587.
[47] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[48] 张影,谢余初,齐姗姗,等.基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生态系统碳储量及空间格局特征[J].资源科学,2016,38(8):1585-1593.
[49] 刘洋,毕军,吕建树.生态系统服务权衡与协同关系及驱动力:以江苏省太湖流域为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7067-7078.
[50] 张紫怡,刘艳芳,张扬,等.生态功能区生态系统服务协同权衡对影响因子的空间非平稳性响应:以福建省为例[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2022,47(1):111-125.
[51] 李子,张艳芳.基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):178-185.
[52] 张明珠,王敏,张晓祥,等.基于InVEST模型的杭州市生态系统服务评估[J].地理信息世界,2021,28(2):57-64.
[53] 刘华妍,肖文发,李奇,等.北京市生态系统服务时空变化与权衡分析[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(1):209-219.
[54] 胡秀芳,赵军,王蓓,等.黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(3):580-588.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-04-10