PDF Download

[1]MA Wei,ZHANG Wenxin,WANG Hongrui,et al.Effects of Land Use Change on Ecological Service Value in A-wen Integration Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):373-382.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.021]

Copy

Effects of Land Use Change on Ecological Service Value in A-wen Integration Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 03 Page number: 373-382 Column: Public date: 2023-04-10

Title:: Effects of Land Use Change on Ecological Service Value in A-wen Integration Area

Author(s):: MA Wei¹, ZHANG Wenxin¹, WANG Hongrui², JIN Feng³, ZHOU Hongyang⁴; (1.Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2.College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 3.Bucea Urban Planning and Design Institute, Beijing 102218, China; 4.College of Urban and Environment Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710727, China)

Keywords:: land use change; ecosystem service value; grid square; land use change simulation; A-wen integration area

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.021

Abstract:: [Objective]The simulation and analysis of the change of land use and ecological service value in the rapid urbanization area can provide a reference for the scientific land use of land spatial planning in A-wen integration area. [Methods] ESV estimation method, CA_ MCE_ Markov model, contribution calculation and analysis were used to examine the impact of land use change in the A-wen City on the value of ecological services from 2010 to 2030. [Results](1)From 2010 to 2030, grassland and unused land were transferred to other land types, and cultivated land, garden land, forest land and construction land were expanded significantly. ESV increased by 12.962 billion yuan, showing the distribution characteristics of high in the north, low in the south and low in the west. Hydrological regulation was the main part of ESV, and the conversion of water area was the main factor affecting the increase and decrease of ESV.(2)The high value area of ESV was located in northern mountainous area. The low value area was located in western mountainous area and oasis plain in the south. The cold spot area of ESV loss was located in the north of Tianshan ecological conservation area and the middle of urban-rural development coordination area, while the ESV value-added hot spot areas were located in the north of Tianshan ecological conservation area, the south of urban-rural development coordination area and the south of pastoral oasis conservation area.(3)From 2020 to 2030, the ESV value-added area will concentrated in Aksu River Basin. The continuation of development trend will lead to negative growth of ESV in urban and rural development coordination area and pastoral oasis conservation area. [Conclusion] Under the precondition of water resource constraint, afforestation of wasteland, protection of water body and forest and grass land, strict control of urban construction land and cultivated land growth, and guidance of internal structure optimization are the effective measures to seek positive gain of ESV and build a strong ecological security barrier at the southern foot of Tianshan Mountain.

References:: [1] 魏慧,赵文武,张骁,等.基于土地利用变化的区域生态系统服务价值评价:以山东省德州市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3830-3839.
[2] 郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.
[3] 廖开怀,符蓝, Werner B,等.边界融合理论视角下的同城化研究:以广佛为例[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(7):115-123.
[4] 沈丽珍,陈少杰,汪侠.流动空间视角下的同城化地区发展阶段划分与特征[J].地理研究,2021,40(9):2558-2571.
[5] 彭耕,熊琳,朱直君,等.新时期成都—资阳同城化空间发展规划探索[J].规划师,2021,37(11):63-68.
[6] 李怡,郭力宇,温豪.陕西渭北旱塬区土地利用与生态系统服务价值变化:以陇县为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):368-373.
[7] 张帅,汪洋,夏婷婷,等.塔里木河生态输水条件下土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].干旱区地理,2021,197(3):739-749.
[8] 底玉洁.基于土地利用变化的武汉城市圈生态系统服务价值研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2016.
[9] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[10] 杨锁华.武汉城市圈生态系统服务价值时空分异影响机制研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2018.
[11] 汪东川,孙志超,孙然好,等.京津冀城市群生态系统服务价值的时空动态演变[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(7):1285-1296.
[12] Luo Q, Zhou J, Li Z, et al. Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors:a comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,725:138452.
[13] Chen W, Chi G, Li J. Ecosystem services and their driving forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020,17(10):3717.
[14] 陈万旭,刘志玲,李江风,等.长江中游城市群生态系统服务和城镇化之间的空间关系研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(15):5137-5150.
[15] Li Z, Sun Z, Tian Y, et al. Impact of land use/cover change on Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration ecosystem services value:temporal-spatial patterns and cold/hot spots ecosystem services value change brought by urbanization[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(1):123.
[16] Chen Y, Lu H, Li J, et al. Effects of land use cover change on carbon emissions and ecosystem services in Chengyu urban agglomeration, China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2020,34(8):1197-1215.
[17] Zhang Y, Zhao L, Liu J, et al. The impact of land cover change on ecosystem service values in urban agglomerations along the coast of the Bohai Rim, China[J]. Sustainability, 2015,7(8):10365-10387.
[18] Liu M, Fan J, Wang Y, et al. Study on Ecosystem Service Value(ESV)Spatial Transfer in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(18):9751.
[19] Yang Y, Zhang H, Zhao X, et al. Effects of urbanization on ecosystem services in the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration, in China: The case of Weifang City[J]. Urban Science, 2021,5(3):DOI:org/10.3390/urbansci5030054
[20] 欧阳晓,贺清云,朱翔.多情景下模拟城市群土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以长株潭城市群为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(1):93-102.
[21] 闫焱.昆玉一体化区域生态系统服务价值研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2019.
[22] Dai X, Wang L, Huang C, et al. Spatio-temporal variations of ecosystem services in the urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,115:106394.
[23] Bindajam A A, Mallick J, Talukdar S, et al. Integration of artificial intelligence-based LULC mapping and prediction for estimating ecosystem services for urban sustainability:past to future perspective[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021,14(18):1-23.
[24] 王波,杨太保.1980—2018年银川市生态系统服务价值评价及驱动力分析[J].干旱区地理,2021,196(2):552-564.
[25] Guan D J, Gao W J, Watari K, et al. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2008,18(4):455-468.
[26] 刘倩,李葛,张超,等.基于系数修正的青龙县生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(6):971-980.
[27] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[28] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[29] 邵雪亚,刘勇,王三,等.快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响:以重庆市北碚区为例[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,36(6):80-85.
[30] 冉圣宏,李秀彬,吕昌河.近20年渔子溪流域土地利用变化的环境影响[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(12):2058-2064.
[31] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[32] 封建民,郭玲霞,李晓华.汉中市土地利用时空变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):275-282.
[33] 毋兆鹏,张金燕,王娟娟,等.精河流域绿洲土地利用及生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(9):1168-1175.
[34] 李冬花,张晓瑶,王咏,等.新安江流域生态系统服务演化过程及权衡协同关系[J].生态学报,2021,41(17):6981-6993.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-04-10